State of Play: The Government Is Shut Down

Welcome to the shutdown. Here’s how we got here.

People stand in front of the White House on eve of the government shutdown.
National Journal
Sept. 30, 2013, 2 a.m.

The fed­er­al gov­ern­ment has shut down.

Des­pite a month of de­bate and a week of frantic le­gis­lat­ive man­euv­er­ing, Con­gress was un­able to bridge its fun­da­ment­al schism: Sen­ate Demo­crats pledged not to pass any budget bill that cut in­to Obama­care, and Re­pub­lic­ans prom­ised they’ll re­ject any bill that didn’t.

Neither side blinked, and so — for the first time in 17 years — the fed­er­al gov­ern­ment will go un­fun­ded.

House Re­pub­lic­ans’ last-ditch bid to reach a deal col­lapsed Monday night when Sen­ate Ma­jor­ity Lead­er Harry Re­id re­jec­ted their call to ne­go­ti­ate over a GOP bill that would keep the gov­ern­ment fun­ded but would bar health­care sub­sidies for mem­bers of Con­gress, their staffs, the Pres­id­ent, his cab­in­et and polit­ic­al ap­pointees.

Re­id re­jec­ted the of­fer, say­ing he would enter budget ne­go­ti­ations only after the House passed his party’s bill to keep the gov­ern­ment open.

The House will re­main in ses­sion un­til 3 a.m. Tues­day morn­ing, but the sun will rise Tues­day on a closed fed­er­al gov­ern­ment: Re­id shuttered the Sen­ate shortly after mid­night, say­ing his col­leagues would not re­turn un­til 9:30 Tues­day morn­ing.

Here’s a full re­cap of how we got here on Monday. More to come.

Con­tri­bu­tions from Tim Al­berta, Matt Ber­man, Mi­chael Cata­lini, Tom De­Frank, Cath­er­ine Hol­lander, Billy House, Elahe Iz­adi, Mar­ina Koren, Patrick Re­is and Dustin Volz

UP­DATE: 12:16 a.m.: The Sen­ate Is Done, the House Is Not

As the fed­er­al gov­ern­ment shut down, shortly after mid­night, Sen­ate Ma­jor­ity Lead­er Harry Re­id an­nounced on the floor that the Sen­ate would re­cess un­til Tues­day morn­ing at 9:30 a.m.

With the House set to vote later in the night on a meas­ure that will in­sist on their res­ol­u­tion and call for a con­fer­ence, Re­id said the Sen­ate would re­turn to­mor­row and vote to table the House’s re­quest. “The ball is in their court,” Sen. Chuck Schu­mer, D-N.Y., said of House Re­pub­lic­ans. (By Shane Gold­mach­er and Mi­chael Cata­lini)

UP­DATE: 11:50 p.m.: It’s a Shut­down

The Of­fice of Man­age­ment and Budget has sent out a memo call­ing on fed­er­al agen­cies to “ex­ecute plans for an or­derly shut­down due to the ab­sence of ap­pro­pri­ations.” OMB Dir­ect­or Sylvia Bur­well called on Con­gress to “act quickly to pass a Con­tinu­ing Res­ol­u­tion,” but as we’ve all learned today, that’s just a funny joke that isn’t yet hap­pen­ing. If you put your money on shut­down, con­grat­u­la­tions. If you’re a gov­ern­ment em­ploy­ee, now’s the time to find out just how es­sen­tial you are. (Matt Ber­man)

UP­DATE 11:28 p.m.: Latest From the House Rules Com­mit­tee

House Rules Com­mit­tee Chair­man Pete Ses­sions, R-Tex., said Monday night that House Re­pub­lic­ans are hop­ing to bring all sides to the ne­go­ti­at­ing table and re­solve the two-cham­ber dif­fer­ences. But even be­fore the com­mit­tee was to form­ally vote on the go-to-con­fer­ence meas­ure, shortly after 11 p.m., Sen­ate Ma­jor­ity Lead­er Harry Re­id, D-Nev., shot it down. And it wasn’t just Sen­ate Demo­crats giv­ing Ses­sions prob­lems. House Rules Com­mit­tee top Demo­crat Louise Slaughter, D-N.Y., called the meas­ure an­oth­er Re­pub­lic­an “fancy two-step.”The form­a­tion of a con­fer­ence would en­tail the ap­point­ment of some House Re­pub­lic­ans and Demo­crats, and Sen­ate Re­pub­lic­ans and Demo­crats, to hash out budget dif­fer­ences. But the pro­ced­ures in­volved — and the ne­go­ti­ations — could not be ac­com­plished be­fore the shut­down dead­line. Demo­crats were fur­ther out­raged that House Re­pub­lic­ans were push­ing such a pro­pos­al after hav­ing re­fused for months to go to con­fer­ence on a full-year’s budget. (By Billy House)

UP­DATE: 11:05 p.m.: Re­id: “We Will Not Go to Con­fer­ence Un­til We Get a Clean CR”

So says the Sen­ate ma­jor­ity lead­er on the Sen­ate floor. Speak­ing of the Re­pub­lic­ans, Re­id said that “they want to close gov­ern­ment.” After Re­id, Sen. Chuck Schu­mer came to the floor to back up his lead­er. “I kind of feel sorry for Speak­er Boehner,” the New York Demo­crat sad. Both sen­at­ors, speak­ing largely from the same talk­ing points, said that they wouldn’t go to a con­fer­ence with a gun to their col­lect­ive head.

Up next: A press con­fer­ence with Nancy Pelosi at 11:15. (By Matt Ber­man)

UP­DATE: 10:54 p.m. — Yeah … we’re shut­ting down.

House Ma­jor­ity Lead­er Eric Can­tor tweeted to mem­bers that the House will vote to­night on a mo­tion that con­tains the anti-Obama­care CR amend­ments they passed earli­er this even­ing and a re­quest for a con­fer­ence with the Sen­ate. We don’t know yet who will be in the con­fer­ence, or even if the Sen­ate will ac­cept such a deal this late in the game.

But, with only an hour to go un­til a shut­down is of­fi­cial, it looks like the gov­ern­ment won’t be fun­ded after mid­night. Now we’ll have to wait to see how long it’ll last. (By Matt Ber­man)

UP­DATE 10:31 p.m. — 1.5 Hours Un­til Shut­down: Obama Signs Pay Our Mil­it­ary Bill

Around 10 p.m. Monday night, Pres­id­ent Obama signed in­to law the Pay Our Mil­it­ary Act, le­gis­la­tion that provides con­tinu­ing ap­pro­pri­ations for pay for the mil­it­ary, shut­down or no shut­down. Con­gress passed the bill earli­er today. (By Mar­ina Koren)

UP­DATE: 10:30 p.m. — 1.5 Hours to Shut­down: To­wards a Con­fer­ence?

A new po­ten­tial path for­ward emerged late Monday in the Sen­ate. A bi­par­tis­an group of sen­at­ors tried to forge a new con­sensus around go­ing to con­fer­ence with the House late Monday. But in or­der for that to work, the House and Sen­ate lead­ers would have to both agree.

“What we are try­ing to fig­ure out is what the House is able to do,” Sen. Lisa Murkowski told Na­tion­al Journ­al. “It’s really easy to do Monday morn­ing quar­ter­back­ing from here.”

Asked wheth­er she thinks the group would avert a shut­down she said, “No,” but crossed her fin­gers so a re­port­er was cer­tain to see. Murkowski also ac­know­ledged that the plan would be polit­ic­ally risky for House Speak­er John Boehner.

“Boy oh boy, if we had the plan, we’d get it over to the House,” she said.

The House Rules Com­mit­tee is sched­uled to meet now to dis­cuss a con­fer­ence.

Nine sen­at­ors, in­clud­ing Rob Port­man, R-Ohio, James Risch, R-Idaho, Jeanne, Shaheen, D-N.H., Bar­bara Mikul­ski, D-Md., John Ho­even, R-N.D., Joe Manchin, D-W.Va., Amy Klobuchar, D-Minn., Ron Kirk, R-Ill, and Murkowski huddled on the Sen­ate floor among them­selves. (By Mi­chael Cata­lini)

UP­DATE: 10:00 p.m. — 2 Hours Un­til Shut­down: Sen. Cornyn: Shut­down’s Com­ing

Sen. John Cornyn, the No. 2 Re­pub­lic­an in the Sen­ate, said he’s heard the House Re­pub­lic­ans may vol­ley over yet an­oth­er bill to fund the gov­ern­ment that Sen­ate Demo­crats would likely re­ject, this time at­tach­ing a pro­vi­sion re­lated to med­ic­al device tax in the health care law.Asked if he thought the gov­ern­ment would shut down, he told Na­tion­al Journ­al, “I do.”

“I feel like that’s what Sen­at­or Re­id and the pres­id­ent want,” he said. (By Shane Gold­mach­er)

UP­DATE: 9:35 p.m. — 2.5 Hours Un­til Shut­down: Sen. Schu­mer to Re­pub­lic­ans: It’s Time to Aban­don Cruz

With the con­tinu­ing res­ol­u­tion back in the hands of the House, Sen. Chuck Schu­mer, D.-N.Y., said late Monday that it’s time for that cham­ber’s Re­pub­lic­ans to take a leaf out of Peter King’s book. The Re­pub­lic­an rep­res­ent­at­ive aban­doned his party’s plan today and voted to table the House’s latest CR.

“There are large num­bers in the Re­pub­lic­an House caucus who know this is wrong,” Schu­mer told Rachel Mad­dow on MS­N­BC. “Very few have the cour­age of Pete King to stand up and say so. But privately, they ad­mit it. And I think that — god for­bid, we shut down the gov­ern­ment — there is go­ing to be such a re­ac­tion against them that they’re go­ing to have to back off, hope­fully after a few days.” Schu­mer said Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, is keep­ing House Re­pub­lic­ans un­der his thumb, “even though [they] know it’s wrong, [they] know it’s ir­ra­tion­al.”

A clean CR could pull some Re­pub­lic­ans out from un­der the pres­sure Schu­mer claims is for­cing them to vote along party lines. (By Mar­ina Koren)

UP­DATE: 9:35 p.m. — 2.5 Hours Un­til Shut­down: Mc­Cain: Amer­ic­ans “Will Blame Con­gress”

Sen. John Mc­Cain said to­night that Con­gress will ul­ti­mately bear the brunt of pub­lic blame if the gov­ern­ment shuts down after mid­night.

“The Amer­ic­an people will blame Con­gress,” the Ari­zona sen­at­or told CNN’s Piers Mor­gan. “That’s not some clair­voy­ance on my point, that’s polling data.”

Mc­Cain, who offered some de­fense to House Re­pub­lic­ans who are still at­tempt­ing to de­fund Obama­care be­cause they “cam­paigned on and said they would go to Wash­ing­ton” to re­peal it, also warned that this shut­down could be more severe than pre­vi­ous ones.

“The im­pact of the shut­down of the gov­ern­ment, since we haven’t passed a single ap­pro­pri­ations bill, will be more im­me­di­ate and im­pact­ful,” Mc­Cain said. He main­tained that ef­forts by the House GOP would con­tin­ue to be fruit­less.

“I’ve seen this movie be­fore. We will not re­peal Obama­care, at least in this fash­ion.” (By Dustin Volz)

UP­DATE: 9:12 p.m. — 3 Hours Un­til Shut­down: The Sen­ate Kills What It Said It’d Kill

The Sen­ate voted shortly after 9 p.m. along party lines to table the House CR amend­ments that delayed the in­di­vidu­al man­date for a year and elim­in­ated health care sub­sidies for some gov­ern­ment em­ploy­ees. From here, the House has to de­cide what to next. While there are some in­dic­a­tions that the House could pass yet an­oth­er anti-Obama­care CR doomed to swift death, there are ink­lings that House lead­er­ship could be pre­par­ing to ac­tu­ally pass a clean CR to pre­vent a shut­down. This is when the night gets fun.

UP­DATE 8:45— 3 Hours to Shut­down: Next Up in the House? Try Again.

The Sen­ate has pledged to vote down House Re­pub­lic­ans third con­tinu­ing res­ol­u­tion aimed at at­tack­ing Obama­care, but GOP lead­er­ship is already con­sid­er­ing a fourth CR that would in­clude cuts to Obama­care, tweets Na­tion­al Re­view‘s Jonath­an Strong.

UP­DATE: 8:39 p.m.—3.5 Hours to Shut­down: The House Passes an­oth­er CR for the Sen­ate to Kill

The House passed its budget res­ol­u­tion 228-201 that in­cludes an amend­ment that would delay the in­di­vidu­al man­date and elim­in­ate health care sub­sidies for some gov­ern­ment em­ploy­ees.

12 Re­pub­lic­ans joined 189 Demo­crats in op­pos­ing the res­ol­u­tion: Mike Ro­gers, R-Ala., Thomas Massie, R-Kan­sas, Joe Bar­ton, R-Texas, Charlie Dent, R-Penn., Kay Granger, R-Texas, Pete King, R-N.Y., Paul Broun, R-Ga., Mario Diaz-Bal­art, R-Fla., Rick Craw­ford, R-Ala., Steve King, R-Iowa, R-Ga., Louie Gohmert, R-Texas, Michele Bach­mann, R-Minn., and Phil Gin­grey, R-Ga.

9 Demo­crats joined 219 Re­pub­lic­ans in sup­port of the res­ol­u­tion: Ron Barber, D-Ar­iz., John Bar­row, D-Ga., Dan Maf­fei, D-N.Y., Sean Malo­ney, D-N.Y., Jim Math­eson, D-Utah, Mike McIntyre, D-N.C., Raul Ruiz, D-Cal­if., Kyrsten Sinema, D-Ar­iz., and Steven Horsford, D-Nev. (By Matt Ber­man, Billy House, Patrick Re­is and Mi­chael Cata­lini)

UP­DATE: 8:25 p.m.—3.5 Hours to Shut­down: King “Blame Cruz for Any Shut­down”

 Rep. Peter King (R-N.Y.) has openly broken ranks with his party’s plan to again pass budget le­gis­la­tion at­tack­ing Obama­care, say­ing he would vote against Re­pub­lic­ans’ latest it­er­a­tion of a con­tinu­ing res­ol­u­tion — and blast­ing the highest-pro­file mem­ber of the “De­fund Obama­care” move­ment. Chris Moody of Ya­hoo! News writes: “King [said] that if the gov­ern­ment did shut down, one man would be re­spons­ible. ‘Ted Cruz should be blamed,’ King said. ‘And any­body that fol­lows him.’”

UP­DATE: 8:17 p.m.—4 Hours Un­til Shut­down: The House Votes Again

The House is now vot­ing on the budget pro­pos­al that would delay the in­di­vidu­al man­date and strip health care sub­sidies for some gov­ern­ment work­ers. It’s a fif­teen minute vote. From there, the bill will likely move to the Sen­ate, where Sen­ate Demo­crats say they will move to table the House GOP Obama­care amend­ment and send back a clean CR.

At that point, things get tense. (By Matt Ber­man)

UP­DATE: 8:13 p.m.—4 Hours Un­til Shut­down: Obama “Proud” Of Re­id, Sen­ate Demo­crats

Pres­id­ent Obama called Ma­jor­ity Lead­er Harry Re­id to­night to dis­cuss fund­ing the gov­ern­ment, ac­cord­ing to a Sen­ate Demo­crat­ic aide. Obama told Re­id he was “proud of the Demo­crat­ic caucus for be­ing united and fight­ing for the af­ford­able care act,” the aide said.

The com­ment serves Demo­crat­ic goals of cast­ing a uni­fied front as Sen­ate and House Re­pub­lic­ans have ar­gued about the best ap­proach to gain lever­age in the de­bate over fund­ing the gov­ern­ment.

Sen­ate Demo­crats have con­sist­ently stressed their unity, and Re­id has been clear about tele­graph­ing his next move: strip­ping the Obama­care lan­guage from any­thing the House passes and pitch­ing a clean CR back to the lower cham­ber. (By Mi­chael Cata­lini)

UP­DATE: 8:12 p.m.—4 Hours Un­til Shut­down: Bach­mann: “We Need To Do Something That Will Ac­tu­ally Stop Obama­care”

Rep. Michele Bach­mann, R-Minn., one of the six Re­pub­lic­ans who voted against the pro­ced­ur­al meas­ure to bring the House CR to the floor, ex­plained that she could not sup­port a bill that does noth­ing to stop Obama­care from tak­ing root to­mor­row.

“All this bill does — it’s a so-called ‘delay’ of the in­di­vidu­al man­date for one year,” Bach­mann told re­port­ers after re­cord­ing her vote. “We need to do something that will ac­tu­ally stop Obama­care from go­ing in­to ef­fect; this bill does not ac­com­plish that.”

There were re­ports that up to 20 House Re­pub­lic­ans were or­ches­trat­ing an at­tempt to tor­pedo the bill be­fore it hit the floor. It seemed pos­sible after this af­ter­noon’s GOP con­fer­ence meet­ing, which saw sev­er­al con­ser­vat­ive mem­bers — and also some mod­er­ates — look­ing vis­ibly un­happy with lead­er­ship’s plan.

But ac­cord­ing to Bach­mann, Re­pub­lic­ans of all ideo­lo­gic­al stripe were fly­ing blind in­to the pro­ced­ur­al vote, with lead­er­ship ap­par­ently un­aware of who would be vot­ing which way and why. “No one knew, be­cause when we left con­fer­ence there wasn’t a vote, and of course there hasn’t been time to whip,” Bach­mann ex­plained. “So this was, I think, kind of a roll of the dice.” (By Tim Al­berta)

UP­DATE: 8:10 p.m.—4 Hours Un­til Shut­down: Boehner Takes the Floor

Speak­er Boehner took the floor full of en­ergy, de­mand­ing that the Sen­ate agrees to his new CR plan in the name of fair­ness. “All the Sen­ate has to do is say yes and the gov­ern­ment is fun­ded to­mor­row,” he said.

The speak­er, who has at times struggled to keep his caucus in line, left the floor to ap­plause.

And yes, he also did a pretty me­diocore im­pres­sion of Pres­id­ent Obama. (By Matt Ber­man)

UP­DATE: 7:58 p.m.—4 Hours Un­til Shut­down: Giv­ing to Char­ity

Sen. Ted Cruz says he will donate his salary to char­ity if there’s a gov­ern­ment shut­down, ac­cord­ing to a state­ment from his of­fice.

Cruz is blam­ing Ma­jor­ity Lead­er Harry Re­id for the shut­down, ar­guing that the Nevadan is not com­prom­ising over Obama­care.

“Elec­ted lead­ers should not be treated bet­ter than the Amer­ic­an people, which is pre­cisely why hard­work­ing Amer­ic­ans de­serve the same Obama­care ex­cep­tion that Pres­id­ent Obama has already gran­ted Mem­bers of Con­gress,” Cruz said in a state­ment.

Mem­bers of Con­gress, along with the pres­id­ent, pres­id­en­tial ap­pointees and Su­preme Court justices, are guar­an­teed paychecks dur­ing shut­downs. Re­pub­lic­an rep­res­ent­at­ives from Cruz’s state fol­lowed in his step quickly, with Blake Far­enthold writ­ing Monday night that he asked the House Chief Ad­min­is­trat­ive Of­ficer to with­hold his pay, and Bill Flores, say­ing he would donate each day’s pay to re­duce the fed­er­al debt.

An email to Cruz’s of­fice ask­ing which char­ity he will donate to has not been answered yet. We’ll up­date when we hear back. (By Mi­chael Cata­lini and Mar­ina Koren)

UP­DATE: 7:17 p.m.—5 Hours Un­til Shut­down: House GOP Re­volt Shut Down

A 225-204 vote in fa­vor of the rule for de­bate on the House CR amend­ments cleared a pos­sible re­volt from mod­er­ates who want to pre­vent a shut­down and con­ser­vat­ives fully op­posed to Obama­care. Only six Re­pub­lic­ans joined Demo­crats in op­pos­i­tion.

Those op­pos­ing: Michele Bach­mann, Steve King, Louie Gohmert, Paul Broun, Charlie Dent, and Pete King. It’s a weird co­ali­tion, with the first four be­ing far to the right of the last two. Rep. Pete King, R-N.Y., thought earli­er this af­ter­noon he could have around 25 mod­er­ate Re­pub­lic­ans join­ing him. It’s not clear what happened to his plan, but we ima­gine there was some severe pres­sure from lead­er­ship. (By Matt Ber­man)

UP­DATE: 7:12 p.m.—5 Hours Un­til Shut­down: Con­ser­vat­ive Poll: For­cing Con­gress In­to Health Ex­changes Is Pop­u­lar

As House Re­pub­lic­ans con­sider in­sert­ing a pro­vi­sion to force mem­bers of Con­gress and their staffs to get health in­sur­ance through the new Obama­care ex­changes set to open Tues­day, the con­ser­vat­ive Amer­ic­an Ac­tion For­um has re­leased a poll of con­gres­sion­al swing dis­tricts show­ing the idea is a win­ner, at least polit­ic­ally. In the sur­vey, con­duc­ted last week, 56 per­cent of re­spond­ents said they would be in fa­vor of in­clud­ing such a pro­vi­sion in a gov­ern­ment fund­ing bill. Still, the poll re­quires some caveats. The sur­vey asked if voters would like to “re­move Con­gress’s ex­emp­tion from Obama­care” — a loaded phras­eo­logy. Still, the sur­vey shows the polit­ic­al po­ten­tial for Re­pub­lic­ans of ham­mer­ing Con­gress, as Sen. Dav­id Vit­ter, R-La., has, on the is­sue of not re­ceiv­ing their health be­ne­fits through the new law and its po­tency in the cur­rent gov­ern­ment fund­ing fight. The Amer­ic­an Ac­tion For­um has pos­ted the poll res­ults here. (By Shane Gold­mach­er)

UP­DATE: 6:54 p.m.—5 Hours Un­til Shut­down: Obama and Boehner Speak

For the first time in over a week, Pres­id­ent Obama and Speak­er Boehner have had a tele­phone con­ver­sa­tion. That in-and-of-it­self doesn’t sound like much, but with the shut­down clocks tick­ing, it may wind up mean­ing a lot.

And, hey, Obama has had some ser­i­ous re­cent suc­cess with phone calls. But, alas, per Fox News‘ Chad Per­gram, the ten minute call yiel­ded no break­throughs.  (By Matt Ber­man)

UP­DATE: 6:46 p.m.—5 Hours Un­til Shut­down: The GOP Mod­er­ate Re­volt

A col­lec­tion of cent­rist House Re­pub­lic­ans are threat­en­ing to tor­pedo Boehner’s plan to send the Sen­ate a third con­tinu­ing res­ol­u­tion that at­tacks Obama­care, Na­tion­al Re­view re­ports. The group, led by New York­ers Peter King and Mi­chael Grimm, wants to avert a shut­down by passing the Sen­ate’s budget ex­ten­sion, and they op­pose their fel­low Re­pub­lic­ans’ strategy of us­ing the threat of a gov­ern­ment shut­down to at­tack the health care law.

“If Obama­care is as bad as we say it’s go­ing to be, then we should pick up a lot of seats in the next elec­tion and we should win the pres­id­ency in 2016,” King said Monday. “This idea of go­ing through the side door to take something you lost through the front door — to me, it’s wrong.”

For Boehner, a re­volt from mod­er­ates would mean at­tack from all sides. His party’s right flank — which has openly de­fied Boehner on sev­er­al key votes since their 2010 as­cen­sion — says the most re­cent it­er­a­tion of the Obama­care at­tack doesn’t do enough to wound the law.

And if the party’s cent­rists won’t back it either, Alaska Re­pub­lic­an Rep. Don Young may prove proph­et­ic. Asked about the GOP’s next move earli­er Monday af­ter­noon, Young said that, right now, Re­pub­lic­ans “don’t have the votes to do any­thing.” (By Patrick Re­is)

UP­DATE: 6:43 p.m.—5 Hours Un­til Shut­down: Sen. Crapo on a Shut­down’s Sil­ver-Lin­ing

With very few hours to go be­fore mid­night, Re­pub­lic­an Sen. Mike Crapo called in­to KBLI ra­dio sta­tion in his home state of Idaho. He re­called the gov­ern­ment shut­downs of 1995 and 1996, and said a sim­il­ar situ­ation today may not ne­ces­sar­ily be a bad thing — at least for the GOP plat­form. After the last shut­downs, “the Re­pub­lic­ans and the pres­id­ent did fi­nally have to come to­geth­er be­cause there was dam­age be­ing done and we all felt that the kind of pro­gress we were try­ing to achieve could be achieved in in­cre­ments,” Crapo said. Pro­gress fol­lowed soon after, he said, in the form of a bal­anced-budget deal in 1997 that con­ser­vat­ives took cred­it for.

“The bot­tom line is, you gotta, I think, be real­ist­ic and re­cog­nize that shut­ting down the gov­ern­ment — as much as it would be very help­ful in some con­text to be able to trim the gov­ern­ment — it’s not something that can be sus­tained forever,” Crapo said. (By Mar­ina Koren)

UP­DATE: 6:36 p.m.—5.5 Hours Un­til Shut­down: Ted Cruz Hits CNN

Sen. Ted Cruz ac­cused Sen­ate Ma­jor­ity Lead­er Harry Re­id of want­ing to force a gov­ern­ment shut­down and de­fen­ded House Re­pub­lic­ans as will­ing to com­prom­ise dur­ing an even­ing ap­pear­ance on CNN.

“I think Harry Re­id af­firm­at­ively wants a gov­ern­ment shut­down,” the Texas fresh­man told Wolf Blitzer. “The House has been work­ing to try to ne­go­ti­ate a com­prom­ise, and the prob­lem has been Harry Re­id and the pres­id­ent.”

Cruz said that House Re­pub­lic­ans have shown an abil­ity to com­prom­ise by try­ing at first to de­fund Obama­care and then try­ing to only delay its im­ple­ment­a­tion for one year. He also cri­ti­cized Obama for be­ing “will­ing to ne­go­ti­ate with the Ir­a­ni­ans but not Re­pub­lic­ans” on the budget battles.

Blitzer asked Cruz what he wanted to get out of the budget crisis and pushed him to give a “real plan” for a way for­ward. Cruz at first re­lied on his usu­al talk­ing points, but when pushed again said the House should pass a series of nar­row con­tinu­ing res­ol­u­tions that spe­cific­ally fund the crit­ic­al ser­vices Obama warned would shut down be­gin­ning at mid­night.

“Let’s one at a time demon­strate a bi­par­tis­an co­oper­a­tion that we saw today with the mil­it­ary. If the pres­id­ent is will­ing to roll up his sleeves and work we can deal with the con­sequences,” Cruz said.

“Spe­cif­ic pro­pos­al com­ing in from Sen. Cruz,” a seem­ingly sur­prised Blitzer re­spon­ded be­fore end­ing the in­ter­view. (By Dustin Volz)

UP­DATE: 6:21—5.5 Hours Un­til Shut­down: House Bill Gets Rare RSC En­dorse­ment

It ap­pears House Re­pub­lic­an lead­er­ship is pulling out the stops to make sure its third CR pro­pos­al passes, even en­list­ing the eld­ers of the Re­pub­lic­an Study Com­mit­tee — a caucus of 175 con­ser­vat­ives who of­ten op­pose lead­er­ship’s ef­forts — to is­sue a state­ment of sup­port for the le­gis­la­tion.

In a rare col­lect­ive en­dorse­ment, the RSC is­sued a state­ment Monday af­ter­noon an­noun­cing that mem­bers of the group’s in­flu­en­tial steer­ing com­mit­tee “un­an­im­ously” sup­port the short-term fund­ing bill, which is head­ing to the House floor this even­ing for a highly-an­ti­cip­ated vote.

“This bill en­sures that all Mem­bers of Con­gress and the White House will fi­nally have to live by the same laws that have been passed, just like all Amer­ic­ans,” RSC Chair­man Steve Scal­ise said in a state­ment. “Either Obama­care is good enough that it should ap­ply to all or it is so bad that it should ap­ply to none. It is time for the sweet­heart deals and back­room ex­emp­tions to end.”

The RSC’s pub­lic state­ment of sup­port — some would call it a whip­ping ef­fort — comes hours after Scal­ise told Na­tion­al Journ­al that he would vote for the bill. By an­noun­cing to RSC mem­bers that mem­bers of the group’s well-re­spec­ted steer­ing com­mit­tee “un­an­im­ously” sup­port the le­gis­la­tion, Scal­ise is openly at­tempt­ing to de­liv­er the right flank of the con­fer­ence for Boehner and his lead­er­ship team.

The RSC does not dis­close the mem­bers of its steer­ing com­mit­tee, but sev­er­al are known to Na­tion­al Journ­al, which re­cently pub­lished an ex­tens­ive re­port on the group’s his­tory and cur­rent op­er­a­tion. Among the most prom­in­ent mem­bers of this RSC lead­er­ship group are three highly-re­spec­ted former chair­men: Jim Jordan of Ohio, Tom Price of Geor­gia and Jeb Hensarling of Texas.

Rep. Paul Ry­an, R-Wisc., a long­time RSC mem­ber and former vice pres­id­en­tial nom­in­ee, is also a known mem­ber of the RSC steer­ing com­mit­tee, and is­sued a state­ment of sup­port for the plan earli­er this af­ter­noon.

Those five mem­bers — Scal­ise, Jordan, Price, Hensarling and Ry­an — are per­haps the five most in­flu­en­tial con­ser­vat­ives in Con­gress, and were called upon at the be­gin­ning of the 113th Con­gress to bridge the di­vide between Boehner and the Re­pub­lic­an rank-and-file. With a gov­ern­ment shut­down loom­ing, and some con­ser­vat­ives openly ques­tion­ing the GOP’s latest fund­ing meas­ure, it’s a sign of these des­per­ate times that mem­bers of the Con­ser­vat­ive Jedi Coun­cil are en­deavor­ing once again to de­liv­er Boehner the votes he needs from the right wing of his House GOP. (By Tim Al­berta)

UP­DATE 5:56—6 Hours Un­til Shut­down: Re­pub­lic­ans: Amer­ic­ans Are on Our Side

On the floor and out­side the Cap­it­ol, Re­pub­lic­ans have spent the day cit­ing the Amer­ic­an people’s dis­ap­prov­al of the Af­ford­able Care Act as the reas­on for the near-dead­line stan­doff in Con­gress. Ac­cord­ing to a CNN/ORC poll re­leased Monday morn­ing, 57 per­cent of Amer­ic­ans say they op­pose the health law. However, nearly two-thirds of those sur­veyed said they wer­en’t aware that on­line health in­sur­ance ex­changes were set to open Tues­day, and half thought the law cre­ated a gov­ern­ment-run in­sur­ance plan that would com­plete with private plans. (By Mar­ina Koren)

UP­DATE 5:53—6 Hours Un­til Shut­down: The Sen­ate Re­pub­lic­ans’ Box

Like a ten­nis cham­pi­on se­cure in the know­ledge he can safely re­turn his op­pon­ent’s vol­ley, Ma­jor­ity Lead­er Harry Re­id, D-Nev., is wait­ing on the House to send the Sen­ate an­oth­er amend­ment to keep the gov­ern­ment run­ning.

When — if — the House does send the Sen­ate its next it­er­a­tion of a con­tinu­ing res­ol­u­tion, Re­id will move to table the meas­ure, ac­cord­ing to a Demo­crat­ic Sen­ate aide. It will be the third time Re­id has punted back the CR to the House since Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, cam­paigned to pres­sure Demo­crats to re­peal the Af­ford­able Care Act.

This raises a ques­tion: In the Sen­ate, home of the fili­buster, why won’t Sen­ate Re­pub­lic­ans rise up and block Re­id? Aside from the po­ten­tial of get­ting beaned with a hot polit­ic­al potato, there’s a pro­ced­ur­al reas­on.

Sen­ate Re­pub­lic­ans won’t be able to block Re­id from mov­ing to table the bill, ac­cord­ing to Sen­ate Re­pub­lic­an and Demo­crat­ic aides, be­cause of par­lia­ment­ary cour­tesy ex­ten­ded to Re­id by the rules that al­low him “first re­cog­ni­tion,” ac­cord­ing to Demo­crat­ic and Re­pub­lic­an Sen­ate aides.

That ex­plains why Re­id moved to vote as soon as the Sen­ate con­vened today, and it also ex­plains why Sen­ate Re­pub­lic­ans have been largely reti­cent today about talk­ing about their next move. Ab­sent per­suad­ing their Demo­crat­ic col­leagues to break ranks, there’s not a whole lot they can do. (By Mi­chael Cata­lini)

UP­DATE 5:45—6 Hours Un­til Shut­down: Power­ful Con­ser­vat­ive Groups Split on House GOP Pro­pos­al

Wash­ing­ton’s two most in­flu­en­tial con­ser­vat­ive ad­vocacy groups split today on the House Re­pub­lic­an CR pro­pos­al, with the Club for Growth back­ing the plan and Her­it­age Ac­tion for Amer­ica op­pos­ing it.

In a late af­ter­noon email to law­makers, Club for Growth VP of Gov­ern­ment Af­fairs Andy Roth an­nounced his or­gan­iz­a­tion would be key-vot­ing in fa­vor of the budget bill, in­form­ing law­makers that the vote “will be in­cluded in the Club’s 2013 Con­gres­sion­al Score­card.”

Neither Roth nor Club for Growth spokes­man Barney Keller offered an ex­plan­a­tion of the group’s sup­port.

Mean­while, Her­it­age Ac­tion re­leased a state­ment around the same time an­noun­cing its op­pos­i­tion to the House meas­ure — quickly adding, however, that it would not key-vote against it.

“Much like the rest of Obama­care, the in­di­vidu­al man­date and staffer ex­emp­tion are bad policy, but the pro­posed changes would not keep the law from tak­ing root,” read a state­ment from Her­it­age Ac­tion. “For that reas­on, Her­it­age Ac­tion op­poses the amend­ment, but will not key vote against it.”

The de­cision by Club for Growth to key-vote in fa­vor of the bill — and Her­it­age Ac­tion’s call not to is­sue a key-vote des­pite its op­pos­i­tion — could ease the con­cerns of Mc­Carthy and his vote-count­ing team. With plenty of House con­ser­vat­ives already un­easy about the pro­pos­al, a key-vote against it from one (or both) of these groups could have spelled doom for the last-minute le­gis­la­tion. (By Tim Al­berta)

UP­DATE: 5:30—6.5 Hours Un­til Shut­down: Key Re­pub­lic­an Hints At Last-Second Deal

Rules Com­mit­tee Chair­man Pete Ses­sions is telling Demo­crats to “stay calm” and get ready for a late-night deal. More on that from NJ‘s Billy House here.

UP­DATE: 5:20—6.5 Hours Un­til Shut­down: Obama on Obama­care: You Can’t Shut It Down

Pres­id­ent Obama took to the White House brief­ing room to out­line what Amer­ic­ans can ex­pect if a gov­ern­ment shut­down takes place at mid­night and to of­fer one last plea to House Re­pub­lic­ans to not let party polit­ics get in the way of one of their most fun­da­ment­al re­spons­ib­il­it­ies.

“Of all the re­spons­ib­il­it­ies con­gress en­dows to Con­gress, two should be fairly simple: pass a budget and pay Amer­ica’s bills,” Obama began shortly after 5 p.m. “But if the United States Con­gress does not ful­fill its re­spons­ib­il­ity to pass a budget today, much of the United States gov­ern­ment will be forced to shut down to­mor­row.”

Obama rattled off a list of what gov­ern­ment pro­grams will con­tin­ue des­pite the shut­down — so­cial se­cur­ity, pub­lic safety and na­tion­al se­cur­ity ser­vices, mil­it­ary and bor­der patrol op­er­a­tions — be­fore list­ing what Amer­ic­ans can ex­pect start­ing to­mor­row.

“Of­fice build­ings would close. Paychecks would be delayed. Vi­tal ser­vices that seni­ors and vet­er­ans, wo­men and chil­dren, busi­nesses and our eco­nomy de­pend on would be ham­strung. Busi­ness own­ers would see delays in rais­ing cap­it­al, seek­ing in­fra­struc­ture per­mits or re­build­ing after Hur­ricane Sandy.”

He cas­tig­ated House Re­pub­lic­ans for at­tempt­ing to use a shut­down as a bar­gain­ing chip to de­rail Obama­care in or­der to “save face after mak­ing some im­possible prom­ises to the ex­treme right of their party” and re­it­er­ated that the law will move for­ward no mat­ter what Con­gress does.

“The Af­ford­able Care Act is mov­ing for­ward. That fund­ing is already in place. You can’t shut it down,” Obama de­clared. “One fac­tion of one party of one house of con­gress in one branch of gov­ern­ment doesn’t get to shut down the gov­ern­ment just to re­fight the res­ults of an elec­tion.”

After his ad­mon­i­tions, Obama closed by say­ing he be­lieved Con­gress could still strike a deal be­fore mid­night.

“My hope and ex­pect­a­tion is that in the 11th hour once again that Con­gress will choose to do the right thing and that the House of Rep­res­ent­at­ives in par­tic­u­lar will choose the right thing.” (By Dustin Volz)

UP­DATE: 4:40—7.5 Hours Un­til Shut­down: “We Kind of All Knew Where This Was Gonna End.” 

Don’t call Sen­ate Re­pub­lic­ans frus­trated—at least not those law­makers who cri­ti­cized Sen. Ted Cruz’s plan to de­fund Obama­care through the con­tinu­ing res­ol­u­tion.

“I’m not frus­trated. I’m not frus­trated in the least,” said Sen. Bob Cork­er, R-Tenn., “I think this was — we kind of all knew where this was gonna end.” Cork­er has been one of the loudest op­pon­ents of Cruz’s quest to tear down the pres­id­ent’s sig­na­ture law.

Cork­er emerged from a closed-door meet­ing of Sen­ate Re­pub­lic­ans Monday af­ter­noon, but de­clined to talk about the party’s next move.

Sen­ate Re­pub­lic­ans will de­cide what to do next after the House acts again, Cork­er said. Asked wheth­er they con­sidered that Re­id will re­ject any­thing oth­er than the CR the Sen­ate sent back to the House Monday morn­ing, Cork­er did not an­swer.

“There’s just not much to say,” he said.

UP­DATE: 4:37—7.5 Hours Un­til Shut­down: GOP Reps. Emerge Un­happy From Caucus Meet­ing

As he emerged from this af­ter­noon’s spe­cial House GOP meet­ing, the si­lence from Ari­zona Rep. Matt Sal­mon was deaf­en­ing. Sal­mon, an oust­poken con­ser­vat­ive who 36 hours earli­er said his com­rades went “bonkers” after Boehner presen­ted the second House CR plan, ap­peared agit­ated and down­trod­den after hear­ing the third and latest it­er­a­tion.

Asked if he was un­happy with the plan, Sal­mon nod­ded his head yes, but re­fused to elab­or­ate.

Sal­mon was the first con­ser­vat­ive to ex­press un­ease with the new GOP pro­pos­al — which would delay Obama­care’s in­di­vidu­al man­date by one year while elim­in­at­ing health care sub­sidies for a wide range of gov­ern­ment em­ploy­ees — but he was not the last.

Rep. Mark Mead­ows, R-N.C., who’s played a lead­ing role in the GOP’s anti-Obama­care push, would not com­mit to vot­ing for the bill when it hits the House floor this even­ing. Like many of his con­ser­vat­ive col­leagues, Mead­ows’s body lan­guage was markedly dif­fer­ent than it was Sat­urday af­ter­noon, when con­ser­vat­ives loudly ap­plauded Boehner’s second CR pro­pos­al.

“I have two ob­ject­ives: keep gov­ern­ment open, and make sure the harm­ful ef­fects of Obama­care don’t hurt the folks I re­prsent,” Mead­ows said slowly, meas­ur­ing his words. When asked if this third pro­pos­al meets those cri­ter­ia, he hes­it­ated, and said: “I’ve got to look at it.”

When asked dur­ing a post-meet­ing press con­fer­ence if his lead­er­ship team had the votes, Boehner nod­ded to Ma­jor­ity Whip Kev­in Mc­Carthy and said, “I’ll let Mc­Carthy talk about votes.” The speak­er quickly ad­ded: “We’re con­fid­ent that this is­sue will pass.”

The mes­sage from House lead­er­ship was that no one — not even the pres­id­ent, them­selves, or their staff mem­bers — should en­joy a spe­cial ex­emp­tion from the health care law. By push­ing this bill, Ma­jor­ity Lead­er Eric Can­tor said, Re­pub­lic­ans are pro­mot­ing “the fun­da­ment­al prin­ciple … of no spe­cial treat­ment for any­one.”

But that prin­ciple could be con­trib­ut­ing to some ten­sion with­in the con­fer­ence. Ac­cord­ing to some GOP law­makers, there was de­bate in the room over wheth­er the sub­sidy ban would hurt their staff mem­bers and drive tal­ent away from Cap­it­ol Hill. “There was some angst that it could hurt our staff, and we don’t want to hurt our staff,” said Rep. John Flem­ing of Louisi­ana. “But you know, the law’s the law.”

Still, des­pite some dis­pleas­ure from the right, top con­ser­vat­ives soun­ded cau­tiously op­tim­ist­ic that the bill will pass to­night — sev­er­al hours be­fore the dead­line for both cham­bers of Con­gress to reach a budget deal to avoid a gov­ern­ment shut­down.

“We’ll see on the floor. Every­body’s go­ing to have to vote,” said Rep. Steve Scal­ise, chair­man of the Re­pub­lic­an Study Com­mit­tee, while step­ping onto an el­ev­at­or fol­low­ing the meet­ing. “I’m a yes.”

When an­oth­er RSC mem­ber on the el­ev­at­or, Michigan Rep. Tim Wal­berg, said that he, too, would be vot­ing yes, Scal­ise slapped him on the back. (By Tim Al­berta)

UP­DATE: 4:01—8 Hours Un­til Shut­down: Obama­care Is Com­ing To­mor­row, No Mat­ter What

Health and Hu­man Ser­vices Sec­ret­ary Kath­leen Se­beli­us told re­port­ers on Monday that what hap­pens in Con­gress won’t af­fect Obama­care’s rol­lout on Oct. 1. “Shut­down or no shut­down, we’re ready to go,” she said at a press brief­ing.

The on­line in­sur­ance mar­ket­places cre­ated by the Af­ford­able Care Act are sched­uled to open on Tues­day. As Na­tion­al Journ­al has pre­vi­ously re­por­ted, much of the spend­ing for the health-re­form law’s im­ple­ment­a­tion is man­dat­ory, and wouldn’t be af­fected even if law­makers vote to de­fund it. (By Cath­er­ine Hol­lander)

UP­DATE: 4:01—8 Hours Un­til Shut­down: Sen. Vit­ter: Demo­crats Are the Ones Push­ing a Shut­down, And They’re Do­ing It to Pro­tect Them­selves

Sen. Dav­id Vit­ter, R-La., spoke ex­tens­ively at a press con­fer­ence late af­ter­noon about his pro­posed amend­ment, which would sub­ject Con­gress to the same rules and reg­u­la­tions of the Af­ford­able Care Act as the rest of Amer­ic­ans. A ver­sion of the amend­ment is in the latest House pro­pos­al. Vit­ter, sur­roun­ded by House Re­pub­lic­ans and tax re­form cru­sader Grover Nor­quist, touched briefly on the day’s on­go­ing back-and-forth, speak­ing con­fid­ently about reach­ing “the fin­ish line.”

Who will cross first — and when — re­mains un­cer­tain. Who to blame for a gov­ern­ment shut­down, however, won’t be a mys­tery, Vit­ter said. “If in a day or two, the Demo­crats are re­fus­ing to con­tin­ue to fund the gov­ern­ment only be­cause of this pro­vi­sion to pro­tect them­selves, then I think they will be cor­rectly per­ceived for what they’re do­ing.”

UP­DATE: 3:47 p.m.—8 hours to a Shut­down: Sen­ate Passes Bill to Pay Mil­it­ary

The Sen­ate passed by un­an­im­ous con­sent a bill passed Sunday morn­ing by the House to pay the mil­it­ary in the event of a gov­ern­ment shut­down. (By Matt Ber­man)

UP­DATE: 3:45 p.m.—8 hours to a Shut­down: The Latest House Pro­pos­al

It’s live here from the House Rules Com­mit­tee. The pro­pos­al delays the in­di­vid­al man­date for a year, and re­moves health care sub­sidies for mem­bers of Con­gres, their staff, the pres­id­ent, vice-pres­id­ent, and polit­ic­al ap­pointees. The com­mit­tee will meet at 4:15 on the res­ol­u­tion.

It might be im­port­ant to keep a watch on a pos­sible erosion of House Re­pub­lic­an unity.

Rep. Richard Hanna, R-New York, a cent­rist House Re­pub­lic­an from the Utica area, tells NJ he’s already de­cided he’ll vote “no,” do­ing so after leav­ing a closed-door con­fer­ence meet­ing with Boehner and col­leagues. And Rep. Don Young, R-Alaska said he doesn’t be­lieve the lead­ers have enough votes to move on any plan.

If all 433 cur­rent House mem­bers show up to vote on this Monday night, the Re­pub­lic­ans could only lose 16 of their votes and still pass it — that is, if no Demo­crats jump party lines.

(By Matt Ber­man and Billy House)

UP­DATE: 3:18 p.m.—9 Hours to a Shut­down: Demo­crats to Re­pub­lic­ans: We Wouldn’t Do This

Speak­ing on the floor after the House bill was tabled, Sen. Claire Mc­Caskill, D-Mo., said the House Re­pub­lic­ans aren’t play­ing the game. There’s more pub­lic sup­port for stricter back­ground checks for gun own­er­ship than for re­peal­ing the Af­ford­able Care Act, she said, but Demo­crats are not bring­ing the gov­ern­ment to the brink of a shut­down over it. “What would every­one think on the oth­er side of the aisle if we just de­cided, well, you know, we’re go­ing to shut down the gov­ern­ment if you don’t pass back­ground checks on guns? It’s what the Amer­ic­an people want,” she said. “That’s not the way we le­gis­late. That’s not the con­sti­tu­tion­al frame­work our found­ing fath­ers put to­geth­er. There would be out­rage that we would try to shut down the gov­ern­ment over back­ground checks on guns.”

Demo­crat­ic Sen. Chuck Schu­mer pro­posed a sim­il­ar hy­po­thet­ic­al in a post-vote press con­fer­ence. What if cur­rent House Minor­ity Lead­er Nancy Pelosi had held up TARP, the bil­lion-dol­lar bail­out pro­gram, un­less Bush-era tax cuts were re­pealed? The New York law­maker said such a move would have been “ir­re­spons­ible.”

Pelosi, flanked by House Demo­crats, re­peated the hy­po­thet­ic­al at an­oth­er press con­fer­ence Monday. “So for [House Re­pub­lic­ans] to be put­ting these ‘gotcha’ things on this bill, is really be­neath the dig­nity of what we come here to do,” she said. “Un­less what you came here to do was shut down the gov­ern­ment — and that is what their con­ten­tion is.” (By Mar­ina Koren)

UP­DATE: 3:15 p.m.—9 Hours to a Shut­down: Sen­ate Likely to Pay Mil­it­ary

The Sen­ate is likely to take up a meas­ure to keep the mil­it­ary paid in the event of a shut­down, a top Demo­crat con­firms.

“We’re not gonna leave the mil­it­ary hanging out,” said Sen. Chuck Schu­mer, D-N.., the No. 3 Demo­crat in the Sen­ate.

When the Sen­ate will vote is not clear. (By Mi­chael Cata­lini)

UP­DATE 3:11 p.m.—9 Hours to a Shut­down: The House GOP Doesn’t Have Votes “to do Any­thing”

Emer­ging from House GOP con­fer­ence, Rep. Don Young of Alaska says Re­pub­lic­ans “Don’t have the votes to do any­thing.” (By Billy House)

UP­DATE 3:08 p.m.—9 Hours to a Shut­down: The House Vote Could Come Late

A House lead­er­ship aide says a vote on a new GOP CR with a delay on the in­di­vidu­al man­date won’t oc­cur un­til to­night. Rules com­mit­tee will set floor pro­ced­ures some­time after 6 p.m.

A House Re­pub­lic­an aide says there are no plans for a clean CR of any time length—”at this time.” (By Billy House)

UP­DATE: 2:57 p.m.—9 Hours to a Shut­down: Harry Re­id and the “Ba­nana Re­pub­lic­ans”

Re­id all-but re­jec­ted a very short-term ex­ten­sion of the budget, one in­ten­ded to avert a shut­down for a few days while ne­go­ti­ations con­tin­ue over a longer bill. Mc­Con­nell floated the idea earli­er Monday, but Re­id dis­paraged the plan.

“The Sen­ate’s bill is a short-term ex­ten­sion,” Re­id said in his press con­fer­ence fol­low­ing a Sen­ate vote to re­ject the anti-Obama­care por­tions of the House’s latest of­fer. “This is a 6-week fund­ing bill. If we can’t pass this, we are truly en­ter­ing the ba­nana Re­pub­lic­an mind­set.” It is un­clear wheth­er Re­id in­ten­ded to say “Ba­nana Re­pub­lic­an mind­set” or the more con­ven­tion­al “Ba­nana Re­pub­lic mind­set.”

In­stead, Re­id called on Boehner to put the Sen­ate’s ver­sion of the con­tinu­ing res­ol­u­tion — one which keeps the gov­ern­ment fun­ded at cur­rent levels and does not af­fect Obama­care — on the House floor for a vote, say­ing the votes of Demo­crats and cent­rist Re­pub­lic­ans com­bined would be enough to pass it. “We are not go­ing to do any­thing oth­er than wait for them to pass our ver­sion of the CR,” he said. “Oth­er­wise, the gov­ern­ment will shut down.”

“Un­der­stand we are deal­ing with an­arch­ists,” Re­id said just be­fore he left the po­di­um.(By Patrick Re­is)

UP­DATE: 2:42 p.m.—9.5 Hours to a Shut­down: Re­ac­tions From the House GOP Meet­ing

Tweets from NJ’s Tim Al­berta, who’s on the scene:

Con­ser­vat­ive Rep. Matt Sal­mon leaves GOP meet­ing look­ing ir­rit­ated. Asked if he’s un­happy, Sal­mon shakes head yes.

— Tim Al­berta (@Tim­Al­berta) Septem­ber 30, 2013

This #GOP con­fer­ence meet­ing now push­ing 90 minutes, and not hear­ing much op­tim­ism from the few mem­bers who’ve ex­ited

— Tim Al­berta (@Tim­Al­berta) Septem­ber 30, 2013

UP­DATE: 2:30 p.m.—9.5 Hours to a Shut­down: Dow Re­cov­ers

The stock mar­ket is sta­ging a gradu­al re­cov­ery Monday af­ter­noon after stocks plunged at the open­ing of Monday trad­ing. As of 2:25 p.m., the Dow Jones In­dus­tri­al Av­er­age is still 109 points down for the day, but that rep­res­ents a steady climb from the morn­ing low, when the Dow lost more than 1 per­cent — about 170 points — at the open­ing bell.

UP­DATE: 2:26 p.m.— 10 Hours to a Shut­down: More on a One-Week CR

On the way in­to their 2 p.m. spe­cial con­fer­ence meet­ing, House Re­pub­lic­ans were stay­ing mostly si­lent about the “ru­mors” of Mc­Con­nell push­ing a one-week clean CR to avoid a gov­ern­ment shut­down.

In fact, many GOP law­makers said they had no know­ledge of Mc­Con­nell’s pro­pos­al.

“That’s the first I’ve heard of it,” said Rep. Tim Wal­berg of Michigan.

Some mem­bers did seem genu­inely in the dark, but it was ap­par­ent from the tone and body lan­guage of oth­ers that they were stick­ing to a co­ordin­ated mes­sage cam­paign.

“Haven’t seen it,” said Rep. Jeb Hensarling of Texas with a broad smile.

Mo­ments later, in a sep­ar­ate con­ver­sa­tion, Rep. Tom Price of Geor­gia echoed: “Haven’t seen it.”

When asked about the Mc­Con­nell pro­pos­al, Rep. Jim Jordan of Ohio just smiled and shook his head.

The reas­on some mem­bers de­clined to spec­u­late about the Sen­ate minor­ity lead­er’s plan may have to do with con­fer­ence polit­ics. House lead­er­ship has been un­der pres­sure not to bring any clean CR to the House floor, re­gard­less of how long it would fund the gov­ern­ment for.

With the health in­sur­ance ex­changes set to open Tues­day morn­ing, a bill that funds Obama­care for one week, some con­ser­vat­ives say, is just as bad as one that funds it for a year.

“It’s go­ing to be very dif­fi­cult to pass any clean CR,” said Rep. Justin Amash of Michigan.

One con­ser­vat­ive, however, seemed open to the idea. In the in­terest of avoid­ing a shut­down, Rep. Matt Sal­mon of Ari­zona said, “If we have to buy a few more days, then so be it.” (By Tim Al­berta)

UP­DATE: 2:19 p.m.— 10 Hours to a Shut­down: Kick Out the Staff!

While the Sen­ate voted to kill the House’s Obama­care amend­ments, staffers were asked to leave a closed-door meet­ing of House Re­pub­lic­ans in the base­ment of the Cap­it­ol. Time for frank talk on op­tions. (By Billy House)

UP­DATE 2:15 p.m. — 10 Hours to a Shut­down: The Sen­ate Votes to Kill the House’s Obama­care Amend­ments

The Sen­ate con­vened at 2:00, and Sen­ate Ma­jor­ity Lead­er Harry Re­id im­me­di­ately put for­ward a mo­tion to table the House CR amend­ments that would delay Obama­care and re­peal the med­ic­al de­vise tax. The vote came along party lines, with Sen. Joe Manchin, D-W.V., go­ing with his party on tabling the amend­ments. Manchin had pre­vi­ously signaled some sup­port for an Obama­care delay, which had turned him in­to a Re­pub­lic­an talk­ing point. (By Matt Ber­man)

UP­DATE 1:55 p.m.—10 Hours to a Shut­down: Car­ney Re­jects Med­ic­al Tax Re­peal

White House Press Sec­ret­ary Jay Car­ney Monday said Pres­id­ent Obama would re­ject a con­tinu­ing res­ol­u­tion that re­peals the med­ic­al device tax, a rev­en­ue rais­ing por­tion of the Af­ford­able Care Act.

“None-of-this is ac­cept­able,” Car­ney said dur­ing his daily press con­fer­ence. “This is just blatant ex­tor­tion.”

Un­like oth­er GOP pro­pos­als, such as a re­peal or delay of all or part of Obama­care, re­peal­ing the med­ic­al device tax has some sup­port among Demo­crats. But Demo­crats thus far have shown very little will­ing­ness to in­clude any changes to Obama­care as part of the budget ex­ten­sion.

Car­ney said re­spons­ib­il­ity for avoid­ing a shut­down rests with House Speak­er John Boehner, say­ing he should pass the Sen­ate’s “clean” con­tinu­ing res­ol­u­tion. Do­ing oth­er­wise, Car­ney said any­thing else would mean the speak­er was giv­ing in­to a “small, very ex­treme” fac­tion of his House caucus.

“The Demo­crats are ask­ing for noth­ing, no con­ces­sions, no ideo­lo­gic­al riders, no spe­cial pet pro­jects, no polit­ic­al gotcha items” to ex­tend gov­ern­ment fund­ing and raise the debt ceil­ing, Car­ney said. “Re­pub­lic­ans on the oth­er hand are at­tach­ing all sorts of agenda items… some of which are wholly un­re­lated to the budget.” (By Patrick Re­is)

UP­DATE 1:54 p.m.—10 Hours to a Shut­down: Mitch Mc­Con­nell to the Res­cue?

Pos­sibly re­pris­ing his role as last-minute sa­vior, Minor­ity Lead­er Mitch Mc­Con­nell is sug­gest­ing to law­makers a one-week con­tinu­ing res­ol­u­tion without policy riders re­lat­ing to Obama­care as a way to avoid a shut­down, a Sen­ate GOP lead­er­ship aide con­firms to Na­tion­al Journ­al.

“The Con­fer­ence is look­ing at op­tions.”

“Des­pite the Demo­crats’ re­fus­al to work with the House to solve the prob­lem, Re­pub­lic­ans are work­ing to pro­tect the troops, pre­vent a shut­down and find solu­tions to the dif­fi­culties caused by Sen­ate Demo­crats’ delays,” Mc­Con­nell spokes­man Mi­chael Bru­mas said in a state­ment.

But Sen­ate Ma­jor­ity Lead­er Harry Re­id shot done the idea out­right. Ex­it­ing the meet­ing of Demo­crats and asked if he was dead set against a one-week CR Re­id said, “Yes.”

Sen­ate Demo­crats in­stead have said they fa­vor a 6-week CR that strips out the House lan­guage delay­ing Obama­care and re­peal­ing the med­ic­al device tax.

Sen. Debbie Stabenow, D-Mich., said be­fore the news of Mc­Con­nell’s of­fer that the Sen­ate would vote this af­ter­noon to send a clean CR back to the House.

This is not Mc­Con­nell’s first stab at haul­ing Con­gress back from the brink. Dur­ing the fisc­al cliff ne­go­ti­ations, it was Mc­Con­nell and Vice Pres­id­ent Joe Biden who au­thored a com­prom­ise to avoid fisc­al crisis. (By Mi­chael Cata­lini)

UP­DATE 1:35 p.m.—10.5 Hours Un­til Shut­down: Sign of House GOP Frac­tur­ing?

Rep. Charlie Dent, R-Pa., a co-chair of the cent­rist “Tues­day Group” caucus in the House, tells NJ on Monday that he will ar­gue in the closed-door House con­fer­ence ex­pec­ted later in the day that it is time to ac­cept a C.R. that will keep gov­ern­ment fun­ded without lan­guage to delay Obama­care, and avoid a shut­down.

Even if hard-liners in the con­fer­ence don’t think so, Dent said he be­lieves Speak­er John Boehner wants to, and that he should put such a CR on the floor. Dent says he be­lieves Demo­crats and enough Re­pub­lic­ans will pass it.

He noted Boehner has already shown sev­er­al times this ses­sion he is will­ing to buck the sup­posed un­of­fi­cial prac­tice of not put­ting le­gis­la­tion onto the floor not sup­por­ted by the “ma­jor­ity of the ma­jor­ity.” He cor­rectly ticks off such things as a hur­ricane re­lief bill, and the Vi­ol­ence Against Wo­men Act — not to men­tion the New Year’s vote on the fisc­al cliff bill.

Dent, echo­ing his po­s­i­tion­ing re­por­ted Fri­day in Na­tion­al Journ­al Daily, said he be­lieves the GOP will be blamed for the shut­down, and that Re­pub­lic­ans’ fisc­al and debt ceil­ing strategies can still be waged. He said no one wants to re­peal the med­ic­al device tax more than he does. But he said at­tach­ing that, or any oth­er strings to a CR at this time, is just not go­ing to get passed the Sen­ate. (By Billy House)

UP­DATE: 1:10 p.m. — 11 Hours Un­til Shut­down: Don’t Ex­pect a Clean House CR

With House Re­pub­lic­ans set to hold a spe­cial con­fer­ence meet­ing at 2 p.m., spec­u­la­tion is swirl­ing about the pos­sib­il­ity of House lead­er­ship present­ing the op­tion of send­ing back to the Sen­ate a “clean” short-term CR that keeps the gov­ern­ment run­ning and buys Re­pub­lic­ans more time to plot against Obama­care.

But ac­cord­ing to mul­tiple seni­or GOP aides, there will be no dis­cus­sion today of a clean CR. With the Sen­ate poised to strip out the anti-Obama­care lan­guage from the House CR this af­ter­noon and speedily send it back to the lower cham­ber, House lead­er­ship is still work­ing with lead­ing con­ser­vat­ives to de­cide how to re­spond, sources tell Na­tion­al Journ­al.

There are sev­er­al pro­vi­sions Re­pub­lic­ans are con­sid­er­ing at­tach­ing to their third CR, which would be promptly re­turned to the Sen­ate. These op­tions, which will be dis­cussed at this af­ter­noon’s con­fer­ence meet­ing, in­clude: a one-year delay of Obama­care’s in­di­vidu­al man­date (not the en­tire law); a ban on health care sub­sidies for mem­bers of Con­gress and their staffs (either in the lan­guage writ­ten by Sen. Dav­id Vit­ter, or some House con­ser­vat­ives); and a re­peal of the med­ic­al device tax, as writ­ten by Rep. Erik Paulsen of Min­nesota.

It’s un­clear, an hour be­fore the meet­ing, which of these op­tions is con­sidered the strongest Re­pub­lic­an re­but­tal to the Sen­ate’s clean CR. But the one-year delay of Obama­care’s in­di­vidu­al man­date has gen­er­ated, by far, the most buzz on Cap­it­ol Hill today. (House Re­pub­lic­ans, eager to con­tin­ue their “com­prom­ise” nar­rat­ive, could point to the 22 House Demo­crats who voted for this delay back in Ju­ly.)

Stay tuned for the latest de­vel­op­ments from the 2 p.m. con­fer­ence meet­ing. (By Tim Al­berta)

UP­DATE: 12:50 p.m. — 11 Hours Un­til Shut­down: The Fun­drais­ing Goes On

Mid­night on Monday brings two dead­lines; one is for fund­ing the gov­ern­ment, and the oth­er is the Fed­er­al Elec­tion Com­mis­sion quarterly fun­drais­ing dead­line.

A bar­rage of fun­drais­ing pitches came from Demo­crats as it be­came clear that Con­gress was bar­rel­ing to­ward a shut­down. An email from Vice Pres­id­ent Biden asked for $3 con­tri­bu­tions to the Demo­crat­ic Party. An­oth­er from Pres­id­ent Obama dir­ec­ted dona­tions to the Demo­crat­ic Con­gres­sion­al Cam­paign Com­mit­tee’s 2014 ef­forts.

Re­pub­lic­ans and con­ser­vat­ives have also been try­ing to cap­it­al­ize off of the cur­rent con­gres­sion­al show­down. The Re­pub­lic­an Na­tion­al Com­mit­tee sent out its own fun­drais­ing email pitch from RNC Chair­man Re­ince Priebus en­titled “I Stand With Ted,” off of the talk-a-thon of Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas.

The Sen­ate Con­ser­vat­ives Fund has been play­ing ads fea­tur­ing Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, ur­ging people to sign a pe­ti­tion to de­fund Obama­care, and a web­site ded­ic­ated to the ef­fort so­li­cits dona­tions.

And des­pite the pos­sible shut­down, at least sev­en mem­bers of Con­gress have sched­uled fun­draisers this week, ac­cord­ing to the Sun­light Found­a­tion. (By Elahe Iz­adi)

UP­DATE: 12:12 p.m. — 12 Hours Un­til Shut­down: The House Demo­crats’ Plans

After the Sen­ate votes, House Demo­crats will caucus be­hind closed doors around 2:30 p.m. At 3:00, House Minor­ity Lead­er Nancy Pelosi and oth­er House Demo­crat­ic lead­ers are ex­pec­ted to hold a press con­fer­ence. (By Billy House)

UP­DATE: 12:00 p.m. —  12 Hours Un­til Shut­down: The Sen­ate Demo­crats’ Strategy

At a press con­fer­ence just be­fore noon, Sen. Bar­bara Box­er, D-Cal­if., out­lined what the Sen­ate Demo­crats will do this af­ter­noon. “We’re go­ing to handle this mes­sage from the House the same way we handled the first bill,” she said. This means that Sen­ate Demo­crats, after a caucus meet­ing, will strip the Obama­care delay and med­ic­al device tax re­peal from the CR and send a clean res­ol­u­tion back to the House.

The frus­tra­tion isn’t just about the full delay. Box­er said that a med­ic­al device tax “has noth­ing to do with this par­tic­u­lar situ­ation that we’re in now.” Even if some Demo­crats are open for de­bat­ing on re­peal­ing that tax — which would cost $29 bil­lion in rev­en­ue over a dec­ade — the party at this point is stand­ing firm on re­fus­ing to ne­go­ti­ate on any as­pect of Obama­care as part of a budget ne­go­ti­ation. 

So what hap­pens from there, if the House just sends an­oth­er CR to the Sen­ate with Obama­care amend­ments? “I’m not at liberty to say what Sen­at­or Re­id will do if, what, when, and how,” Box­er said.

We’ll see how that holds after the caucus meet­ing, which is ex­pec­ted to hap­pen at 1:!5 p.m. The Sen­ate is ex­pec­ted to vote just after 2. (By Matt Ber­man)

UP­DATE: 11:00 a.m. —  13 Hours Un­til Shut­down: An Angry Break­fast With Chris Van Hol­len

The re­main­ing shred of good will between Re­pub­lic­an and Demo­crat­ic com­batants in the House all but evap­or­ated Monday as a key Demo­crat­ic le­gis­lat­or ac­cused Speak­er John Boehner of ab­dic­at­ing his au­thor­ity to fresh­man Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Tex.), ringlead­er-in-chief of the gov­ern­ment shut­down war.

“Sen. Cruz is es­sen­tially run­ning the show in the House,” Rep. Chris Van Hol­len told a re­port­ers’ break­fast. “If Speak­er Boehner doesn’t want to ex­ert lead­er­ship he should go ahead and turn the gavel over to Speak­er (sic) Cruz.”

The rank­ing Demo­crat on the House Budget Com­mit­tee, Van Hol­len re­peated that “Sen. Cruz is dic­tat­ing policy in the House of Rep­res­ent­at­ives today.” With his lead­er­ship squarely on the line, Boehner has two choices, he ad­ded: “Either he should step aside for Sen. Cruz or he should ex­ert some lead­er­ship.”

House Demo­crats and White House of­fi­cials, who be­lieve Boehner is the weak­est speak­er in dec­ades for not stand­ing up to re­bel­li­ous tea-party zealots in his GOP caucus, privately say Boehner would like to find a middle ground to keep the gov­ern­ment from shut­ting down at mid­night be­cause he un­der­stands Re­pub­lic­ans will be blamed by most Amer­ic­ans. But they claim Boehner can­not risk ali­en­at­ing the ex­trem­ist wing of his caucus lest he be tossed out as House speak­er. (By Tom De­Frank)

What We're Following See More »
McCain Family to Endorse Biden
8 hours ago

"The late Sen. John McCain's family plans to support former Vice President Joe Biden's White House bid, backing the Democrat not only in his party's crowded primary race but also in a general election matchup with President Trump, the Washington Examiner has learned. In an extraordinary snub to Trump, who derided McCain's Vietnam War service and mocked him even after his death last August at age 81, the McCain family is preparing to break with the Republican Party. McCain represented the party in Congress for 35 years and was chosen as its presidential nominee in 2008, losing to Barack Obama."

Trump Opposes White House Aides Giving Congressional Testimony
12 hours ago

"President Trump on Tuesday said he is opposed to current and former White House aides providing testimony to congressional panels in the wake of the special counsel report, intensifying a power struggle between his administration and House Democrats. In an interview with The Washington Post, Trump said that complying with congressional requests was unnecessary after the White House cooperated with special counsel Robert S. Mueller III’s probe of Russian interference and the president’s own conduct in office."

Nadler Subpoenas Unredacted Report
5 days ago
Mueller Made 14 Criminal Referrals
6 days ago
The Report Is Here
6 days ago

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.