Former House Speaker Dennis Hastert says the famous — or infamous — rule that bears his name doesn’t actually exist. “There really wasn’t a ‘Hastert Rule,’ ” the longest-serving Republican speaker, who is now a lobbyist and consultant, told National Journal in a phone interview Wednesday evening.
The Hastert Rule, as it’s become known, is more of a self-imposed standard that says House leaders shouldn’t allow a vote on a bill unless it has the support of the majority of their own party. The rule has been cited as the reason Speaker John Boehner won’t bring up a clean continuing resolution to reopen the government, even though it probably has the 218 votes needed to pass, as well as the reason Congress can’t pass immigration reform, new gun-control laws, or much else.
If Boehner were only willing to break the Hastert Rule more often, the thinking goes, the possibilities would be endless. Of course, that’s probably not going to happen, but either way, Hastert says don’t blame him.
“That was a misnomer at a press conference. One time they asked me about immigration legislation, why don’t I just use Democrat votes? I said, well I’m never going to not have a majority of my own party go along with me. If you do that, then you’re not using your own policy. And [the press] blew that up as the Hastert Rule. The Hastert Rule, really, was: If you don’t have 218 votes, you didn’t bring the bill to the floor,” he explained.
Asked by a surprised reporter to confirm that he, Dennis Hastert, thinks there is no rule named after him, the former speaker replied: “There is no Hastert Rule, no.”
Still, when asked if Boehner should try to pass a clean CR by breaking the rule heretofore known by Hastert’s name, the former speaker said his successor should not. “I would be very careful with Speaker Boehner; I would make sure that he had a majority of his conference on board with him,” he said.
Indeed, the “majority of the majority” principle was in place long before Hastert — he just put a name to it, intentionally or otherwise. In today’s Washington, even Hastert’s former aides think the controversial rule may need to be made more flexible. But Hastert himself warned Boehner in January against breaking his non-rule too many times. “Here is the problem. Maybe you can do it once, maybe you can do it twice, but when start making deals when you have to get Democrats to pass the legislation, you are not in power anymore,” he told a conservative radio host in January.
For his part, the former speaker refrained from criticizing Boehner or anyone else in Washington, saying instead that politicians need to do more compromising.
By way of example, he told a story about a budget impasse late in the Clinton administration when House and Senate negotiators were about $100 billion apart from each other and deadlocked. Clinton was on a trip to Africa and out of pocket, but Hastert was told he would finally get a chance to speak with the president, who was in Turkey, the next morning at 10:00 local time. That made it 2 a.m. in Washington. So Hastert, from his office in the Capitol, dialed the White House switchboard and was patched through to Clinton, sitting in the back of a limousine in Ankara, 10,000 miles away.
The president asked what Hastert wanted (and here, the former speaker does his best Clinton impression). Hastert told him a 1 percent across-the-board haircut. Clinton said that’s too much and offered 0.25 percent instead. Hastert counteroffered and so on, until they settled on .86 percent, and that was that. “The moral of the story is: We sat down — well, not actually, he was so far away — and we got the job done,” Hastert says.
What We're Following See More »
President Obama became a surprise topic of contention toward the end of the Democratic debate, as Hillary Clinton reminded viewers that Sanders had challenged the progressive bona fides of President Obama in 2011 and suggested that someone might challenge him from the left. “The kind of criticism that we’ve heard from Senator Sanders about our president I expect from Republicans, I do not expect from someone running for the Democratic nomination to succeed President Obama,” she said. “Madame Secretary, that is a low blow,” replied Sanders, before getting in another dig during his closing statement: “One of us ran against Barack Obama. I was not that candidate.”
It’s all about the 1% and Wall Street versus everyone else for Bernie Sanders—even when he’s talking about race relations. Like Hillary Clinton, he needs to appeal to African-American and Hispanic voters in coming states, but he insists on doing so through his lens of class warfare. When he got a question from the moderators about the plight of black America, he noted that during the great recession, African Americans “lost half their wealth,” and “instead of tax breaks for billionaires,” a Sanders presidency would deliver jobs for kids. On the very next question, he downplayed the role of race in inequality, saying, “It’s a racial issue, but it’s also a general economic issue.”
It’s been said in just about every news story since New Hampshire: the primaries are headed to states where Hillary Clinton will do well among minority voters. Leaving nothing to chance, she underscored that point in her opening statement in the Milwaukee debate tonight, saying more needs to be done to help “African Americans who face discrimination in the job market” and immigrant families. She also made an explicit reference to “equal pay for women’s work.” Those boxes she’s checking are no coincidence: if she wins women, blacks and Hispanics, she wins the nomination.
Under pressure from a judge, the State Department will release about 550 of Hillary Clinton’s emails—“roughly 14 percent of the 3,700 remaining Clinton emails—on Saturday, in the middle of the Presidents Day holiday weekend.” All of the emails were supposed to have been released last month. Related: State subpoenaed the Clinton Foundation last year, which brings the total number of current Clinton investigations to four, says the Daily Caller.