A senior Obama administration diplomat on Thursday pressed U.S. senators not to legislate new economic sanctions against Iran until after a multilateral meeting slated for later this month on the country’s nuclear program, The Hill newspaper reported.
“I would hope that you will allow us the time to begin these negotiations [with Iran] and see if, in fact, there is anything real here,” U.S. Under Secretary of State for Political Affairs Wendy Sherman told the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. Iran would hear “quite directly that if there isn’t … everyone is ready to act,” added Sherman, Washington’s top envoy to talks between Iran and six negotiating powers.
The House of Representatives passed legislation in July that would expand economic constraints on non-U.S. companies doing business with Iran, and the Senate Banking Committee is preparing a similar Iran sanctions bill.
Sherman is concerned about the timing of Congress’ deliberations on such legislation because of a planned Oct. 15-16 meeting in Geneva over suspicions that Tehran’s atomic efforts are geared toward development of a nuclear-arms capability. Iran’s recently installed president has pledged to seek quick progress in the talks, which have dragged out for years in an on-and-off fashion.
Still, the House bill’s sponsor said the Senate should “pass sanctions legislation now.”
Doing so would “increase our negotiating leverage and deny Tehran the resources to continue its nuclear program,” House Foreign Affairs Committee Chairman Ed Royce (R-Calif.) said on Thursday in released comments.
Separately, Sherman said Washington’s implementation of existing Iran penalties has been “hampered significantly” since many government offices closed their doors on Tuesday, The Hill reported separately.
What We're Following See More »
The Commission on Presidential Debates put out a statement today that gives credence to Donald Trump's claims that he had a bad microphone on Monday night. "Regarding the first debate, there were issues regarding Donald Trump's audio that affected the sound level in the debate hall," read the statement in its entirety.
"A video of Donald Trump testifying under oath about his provocative rhetoric about Mexicans and other Latinos is set to go public" as soon as today. "Trump gave the testimony in June at a law office in Washington in connection with one of two lawsuits he filed last year after prominent chefs reacted to the controversy over his remarks by pulling out of plans to open restaurants at his new D.C. hotel. D.C. Superior Court Judge Brian Holeman said in an order issued Thursday evening that fears the testimony might show up in campaign commercials were no basis to keep the public from seeing the video."
No matter that his recall of foreign leaders leaves something to be desired, Gary Johnson is the choice of the Chicago Tribune's editorial board. The editors argue that Donald Trump couldn't do the job of president, while hitting Hillary Clinton for "her intent to greatly increase federal spending and taxation, and serious questions about honesty and trust." Which leaves them with Johnson. "Every American who casts a vote for him is standing for principles," they write, "and can be proud of that vote. Yes, proud of a candidate in 2016."
"By all means vote, just not for Donald Trump." That's the message from USA Today editors, who are making the first recommendation on a presidential race in the paper's 34-year history. It's not exactly an endorsement; they make clear that the editorial board "does not have a consensus for a Clinton endorsement." But they state flatly that Donald Trump is, by "unanimous consensus of the editorial board, unfit for the presidency."