State Department: New Iran Sanctions Could Hurt Nuclear Talks

Global Security Newswire Staff
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Global Security Newswire Staff
Oct. 3, 2013, 11:02 a.m.

A seni­or Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion dip­lo­mat on Thursday pressed U.S. sen­at­ors not to le­gis­late new eco­nom­ic sanc­tions against Ir­an un­til after a mul­ti­lat­er­al meet­ing slated for later this month on the coun­try’s nuc­le­ar pro­gram, The Hill news­pa­per re­por­ted.

“I would hope that you will al­low us the time to be­gin these ne­go­ti­ations [with Ir­an] and see if, in fact, there is any­thing real here,” U.S. Un­der Sec­ret­ary of State for Polit­ic­al Af­fairs Wendy Sher­man told the Sen­ate For­eign Re­la­tions Com­mit­tee. Ir­an would hear “quite dir­ectly that if there isn’t … every­one is ready to act,” ad­ded Sher­man, Wash­ing­ton’s top en­voy to talks between Ir­an and six ne­go­ti­at­ing powers.

The House of Rep­res­ent­at­ives passed le­gis­la­tion in Ju­ly that would ex­pand eco­nom­ic con­straints on non-U.S. com­pan­ies do­ing busi­ness with Ir­an, and the Sen­ate Bank­ing Com­mit­tee is pre­par­ing a sim­il­ar Ir­an sanc­tions bill.

Sher­man is con­cerned about the tim­ing of Con­gress’ de­lib­er­a­tions on such le­gis­la­tion be­cause of a planned Oct. 15-16 meet­ing in Geneva over sus­pi­cions that Tehran’s atom­ic ef­forts are geared to­ward de­vel­op­ment of a nuc­le­ar-arms cap­ab­il­ity. Ir­an’s re­cently in­stalled pres­id­ent has pledged to seek quick pro­gress in the talks, which have dragged out for years in an on-and-off fash­ion.

Still, the House bill’s spon­sor said the Sen­ate should “pass sanc­tions le­gis­la­tion now.”

Do­ing so would “in­crease our ne­go­ti­at­ing lever­age and deny Tehran the re­sources to con­tin­ue its nuc­le­ar pro­gram,” House For­eign Af­fairs Com­mit­tee Chair­man Ed Royce (R-Cal­if.) said on Thursday in re­leased com­ments.

Sep­ar­ately, Sher­man said Wash­ing­ton’s im­ple­ment­a­tion of ex­ist­ing Ir­an pen­al­ties has been “hampered sig­ni­fic­antly” since many gov­ern­ment of­fices closed their doors on Tues­day, The Hill re­por­ted sep­ar­ately.

What We're Following See More »
Johnson on Ballot Everywhere, Followed by Stein, McMullin
1 hours ago
Is McMullin Building the GOP in Exile?
2 hours ago

Evan McMullin, the independent conservative candidate who may win his home state of Utah, is quietly planning to turn his candidacy into a broader movement for principled conservatism. He tells BuzzFeed he's "skeptical" that the Republican party can reform itself "within a generation" and that the party's internal "disease" can't be cured via "the existing infrastructure.” The ex-CIA employee and Capitol Hill staffer says, “I have seen and worked with a lot of very courageous people in my time [but] I have seen a remarkable display of cowardice over the last couple of months in our leaders.” McMullin's team has assembled organizations in the 11 states where he's on the ballot, and adviser Rick Wilson says "there’s actually a very vibrant market for our message in the urban northeast and in parts of the south."

Clinton Up 9 in USA Today Poll; Up 3 According to Fox
2 hours ago

A new USA Today/Suffolk University poll finds Clinton leads Trump by 9 points nationwide, 47% to 38%. A Fox News national poll has Clinton up just three points, 44% to 41% over Trump.

Too Many Potential Enrollees Paying Obamacare Penalties Instead
4 hours ago

One of the main reasons for the recent Obamacare premium hikes is that many potential enrollees have simply decided to pay the tax penalty for remaining uninsured, rather than pay for insurance. More than 8 million people paid the penalty in 2014, and preliminary numbers for 2015 suggest that the number approaches 6 million. "For the young and healthy who are badly needed to make the exchanges work, it is sometimes cheaper to pay the Internal Revenue Service than an insurance company charging large premiums, with huge deductibles."

Cruz: Eight Justices Could Be an Ongoing Situation
5 hours ago

Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) said that "there was “precedent” for a Supreme Court with fewer than nine justices—appearing to suggest that the blockade on nominee Merrick Garland could last past the election." Speaking to reporters in Colorado, Cruz said: "I would note, just recently, that Justice Breyer observed that the vacancy is not impacting the ability of the court to do its job. That’s a debate that we are going to have.”


Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.