For Big Business, Money and Mouth at Odds on Debt Ceiling

Goldman Sachs chairman and chief executive officer Lloyd Blankfein sits down to testify before the Senate Subcommittee on Investigations hearing on Wall Street investment banks and the financial crisis on Capitol Hill in Washington, Tuesday, April 27, 2010. (AP Photo/Susan Walsh
National Journal
Elahe Izadi
Oct. 6, 2013, 7:34 a.m.

Last week, the CEO of Gold­man Sachs emerged from a White House meet­ing with Pres­id­ent Obama with a mes­sage to Con­gress: Don’t play around with the debt ceil­ing.

“You can re-lit­ig­ate these policy is­sues in a polit­ic­al for­um, but we shouldn’t use threats of caus­ing the U.S. to fail on its ob­lig­a­tions to re­pay its debt as a cudgel,” Lloyd Blank­fein said.

Yet ex­ec­ut­ives and oth­ers at Gold­man Sachs and sim­il­ar big fin­an­cial firms have con­trib­uted tens of thou­sands of dol­lars to some of the very politi­cians who helped set the stage for the cur­rent show­down — and con­cerns over the debt ceil­ing.

For in­stance, Gold­man Sachs was the fourth-largest donor to Re­pub­lic­an Sen. Ted Cruz in the 2012 elec­tion cycle, ac­cord­ing to the Cen­ter for Re­spons­ive Polit­ics. Dona­tions from in­di­vidu­als as­so­ci­ated with the firm — where’s Cruz’s wife works — and the com­pany PAC totaled al­most $66,000.

Per­haps more than any oth­er law­maker, Cruz has in­sisted that a bill to keep the gov­ern­ment fun­ded be tied to meas­ures that would weak­en the Af­ford­able Care Act, set­ting the stage for last week’s gov­ern­ment shut­down. As law­makers fight over how to pass a short-term meas­ure to fund gov­ern­ment agen­cies, the de­bate threatens to en­gulf dis­cus­sions over wheth­er to in­crease the debt ceil­ing.

Over­all, people af­fil­i­ated with Gold­man Sachs donated roughly equal amounts to Re­pub­lic­ans and Demo­crats in Con­gress. But the fin­an­cial sec­tor gen­er­ally fa­vors the GOP. Con­tri­bu­tions in the cur­rent cycle total $64.4 mil­lion, 56 per­cent of which has gone to Re­pub­lic­ans.

Moreover, there are sev­er­al con­ser­vat­ive Re­pub­lic­ans who sup­por­ted the strategy that led to the shut­down who count ma­jor busi­ness in­terests among their top donors.

Rep. Steve King, R-Iowa, has re­ceived $51,000 from the Amer­ic­an Bankers As­so­ci­ation’s PAC since 2010, mak­ing the group his second-largest donor. Rep. Tim Huel­skamp, R-Kan., coun­ted the PAC as his fourth-largest donor, at $22,000.

As­so­ci­ation Pres­id­ent Frank Keat­ing, who is also a mem­ber of the Bi­par­tis­an Policy Cen­ter’s Debt Re­duc­tion Task Force, penned an ed­it­or­i­al last month in The Wash­ing­ton Post warn­ing of grave con­sequences should the na­tion de­fault on its debt. “Us­ing the debt ceil­ing as lever­age in the de­fi­cit de­bate is un­wise and dan­ger­ous,” he wrote. “Cit­izens na­tion­wide are frus­trated with the polit­ic­al stale­mate in Wash­ing­ton. But our na­tion’s fin­an­cial in­teg­rity should not be used as a bar­gain­ing chip.”

Yet last week, Huel­skamp told The Wash­ing­ton Times he would vote against rais­ing the debt ceil­ing without a long-term fisc­al plan that in­cludes Obama­care re­stric­tions.

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
These (Supposed) Iowa and NH Escorts Tell All
30 minutes ago
NATIONAL JOURNAL AFTER DARK

Before we get to the specifics of this exposé about escorts working the Iowa and New Hampshire primary crowds, let’s get three things out of the way: 1.) It’s from Cosmopolitan; 2.) most of the women quoted use fake (if colorful) names; and 3.) again, it’s from Cosmopolitan. That said, here’s what we learned:

  • Business was booming: one escort who says she typically gets two inquiries a weekend got 15 requests in the pre-primary weekend.
  • Their primary season clientele is a bit older than normal—”40s through mid-60s, compared with mostly twentysomething regulars” and “they’ve clearly done this before.”
  • They seemed more nervous than other clients, because “the stakes are higher when you’re working for a possible future president” but “all practiced impeccable manners.”
  • One escort “typically enjoy[s] the company of Democrats more, just because I feel like our views line up a lot more.”
Source:
STATE VS. FEDERAL
Restoring Some Sanity to Encryption
30 minutes ago
WHY WE CARE

No matter where you stand on mandating companies to include a backdoor in encryption technologies, it doesn’t make sense to allow that decision to be made on a state level. “The problem with state-level legislation of this nature is that it manages to be both wildly impractical and entirely unenforceable,” writes Brian Barrett at Wired. There is a solution to this problem. “California Congressman Ted Lieu has introduced the ‘Ensuring National Constitutional Rights for Your Private Telecommunications Act of 2016,’ which we’ll call ENCRYPT. It’s a short, straightforward bill with a simple aim: to preempt states from attempting to implement their own anti-encryption policies at a state level.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
What the Current Crop of Candidates Could Learn from JFK
30 minutes ago
WHY WE CARE

Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Hillary Is Running Against the Bill of 1992
30 minutes ago
WHY WE CARE

The New Covenant. The Third Way. The Democratic Leadership Council style. Call it what you will, but whatever centrist triangulation Bill Clinton embraced in 1992, Hillary Clinton wants no part of it in 2016. Writing for Bloomberg, Sasha Issenberg and Margaret Talev explore how Hillary’s campaign has “diverged pointedly” from what made Bill so successful: “For Hillary to survive, Clintonism had to die.” Bill’s positions in 1992—from capital punishment to free trade—“represented a carefully calibrated diversion from the liberal orthodoxy of the previous decade.” But in New Hampshire, Hillary “worked to juggle nostalgia for past Clinton primary campaigns in the state with the fact that the Bill of 1992 or the Hillary of 2008 would likely be a marginal figure within today’s Democratic politics.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Trevor Noah Needs to Find His Voice. And Fast.
1 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

At first, “it was pleasant” to see Trevor Noah “smiling away and deeply dimpling in the Stewart seat, the seat that had lately grown gray hairs,” writes The Atlantic‘s James Parker in assessing the new host of the once-indispensable Daily Show. But where Jon Stewart was a heavyweight, Noah is “a very able lightweight, [who] needs time too. But he won’t get any. As a culture, we’re not about to nurture this talent, to give it room to grow. Our patience was exhausted long ago, by some other guy. We’re going to pass judgment and move on. There’s a reason Simon Cowell is so rich. Impress us today or get thee hence. So it comes to this: It’s now or never, Trevor.”

Source:
×