As Sun Shines on Solar Industry, Power Companies Fret

A picture shows solar panels installed on the roof of a building in Lille on September 9, 2013.
National Journal
Clare Foran
Add to Briefcase
Clare Foran
Oct. 6, 2013, 7:27 a.m.

Com­pared with the cost of fossil-fuel-gen­er­ated elec­tri­city, sol­ar power isn’t cheap. But it’s be­com­ing more af­ford­able thanks to state and fed­er­al sub­sidies and com­pet­it­ive leas­ing and fin­an­cing op­tions. Add to this the fast-drop­ping price of photo­vol­ta­ic pan­els and sol­ar is start­ing to look like an in­creas­ingly cost-ef­fect­ive op­tion for many Amer­ic­ans.

As the tech­no­logy be­comes more wide­spread, however, util­it­ies are fight­ing harder than ever to stop sol­ar in its tracks, and they see reg­u­la­tion levied through state gov­ern­ments as the way to do it.

A main reas­on why sol­ar has be­come in­creas­ingly af­ford­able and a ma­jor thorn in the side of power com­pan­ies is a policy, now in ef­fect in 43 states, called net-meter­ing. Through these sys­tems, cus­tom­ers with sol­ar pan­els can earn cred­its for sur­plus elec­tri­city gen­er­ated dur­ing the day. The cred­its are then sold back to the util­ity and used to off­set the cost of con­ven­tion­al power pro­duc­tion, which sol­ar users must still rely on when the sun is not shin­ing.

Net-meter­ing has func­tioned as a kind of sub­sidy for sol­ar power, and sol­ar ad­voc­ates want the policy to re­main in place. Util­it­ies, however, ar­gue that now that sol­ar has be­come more af­ford­able, these sub­sidies should be scaled back or elim­in­ated al­to­geth­er.

Ac­cord­ing to Richard McMa­hon, vice pres­id­ent for en­ergy sup­ply and fin­ance at the Edis­on Elec­tric In­sti­tute, a trade as­so­ci­ation rep­res­ent­ing all U.S. in­vestor-owned elec­tric com­pan­ies, util­it­ies aren’t en­tirely op­posed to net-meter­ing; they just want a change in terms.

“What we’re con­cerned with primar­ily is the rate at which the util­it­ies are ex­pec­ted to pay for the sur­plus power gen­er­ated by con­sumers us­ing sol­ar pan­els,” he told Na­tion­al Journ­al Daily. “That’s what’s known as the feed-in tar­iff, and these tar­iffs are set much high­er than at mar­ket rates. These sub­sidies were put in place when sol­ar was in its nas­cent stages but now it’s out­grown the need for them.”

In ad­di­tion to press­ing state reg­u­lat­ors to re­vise the rates at which sol­ar users sell back their elec­tri­city to util­it­ies com­pan­ies, EEI is ask­ing state le­gis­lat­ors to raise costs for sol­ar cus­tom­ers. McMa­hon says this is be­cause sol­ar cus­tom­ers aren’t pay­ing their fair share for use of the power grid.

Sol­ar ad­voc­ates, on the oth­er hand, say the sub­sidies are do­ing what they’re sup­posed to do — make sol­ar more af­ford­able — and that they need to be left un­touched.

“Earn­ing a cred­it for the elec­tri­city that feeds back in­to the grid is only fair,” said Will Craven, a spokes­man for the Al­li­ance for Sol­ar Choice, a co­ali­tion of sol­ar fin­an­cing and elec­tri­city com­pan­ies.

“Really what util­it­ies are at­tack­ing right now is the cus­tom­er’s right to use less elec­tri­city,” he said. “When sol­ar was a boutique en­ergy source that was only avail­able to the wealthy, it was something util­it­ies could tol­er­ate. But now that sol­ar costs have come down greatly, they are threatened by us be­cause we rep­res­ent really the first com­pet­i­tion they have ever had.”

So far no ma­jor reg­u­lat­ory changes im­pact­ing net-meter­ing or feed-in tar­iffs on the state level have been en­acted, but util­it­ies across the coun­try are press­ing for change. Lob­by­ing ef­forts are play­ing out in many state cap­it­als, but McMa­hon said that in the fu­ture there could be is­sues re­lat­ing to reg­u­la­tion of sol­ar power and costs borne by util­it­ies that need to be ad­dressed by the Fed­er­al En­ergy Reg­u­lat­ory Com­mis­sion.

What re­mains to be seen now is wheth­er any of the pro­posed changes will go through and how they stand to al­ter the cost equa­tion on sol­ar if they’re suc­cess­ful.

At least one sol­ar ex­pert thinks the im­pact could be dev­ast­at­ing.

“I think it could hurt it pretty badly,” said An­drea Luecke, ex­ec­ut­ive dir­ect­or of the Sol­ar Found­a­tion, a non­profit ded­ic­ated to pro­mot­ing the ex­pan­sion of sol­ar tech­no­logy, when asked how ad­di­tion­al fees levied on cus­tom­ers us­ing sol­ar on a res­id­en­tial scale would im­pact the in­dustry. “Do I think it will kill it? In the short term, yes. We’re not yet at a point where we can com­pete without in­cent­ives or some type of sup­port. If util­it­ies win in this battle and ef­fect­ively shut­ter res­id­en­tial mar­kets, it’s go­ing to have a very dra­mat­ic ef­fect.”

Alex Brown contributed to this article.
What We're Following See More »
TWO MONTHS AFTER REFUSING AT CONVENTION
Cruz to Back Trump
1 days ago
THE LATEST
WHO TO BELIEVE?
Two Polls for Clinton, One for Trump
1 days ago
THE LATEST

With three days until the first debate, the polls are coming fast and furious. The latest round:

  • An Associated Press/Gfk poll of registered voters found very few voters committed, with Clin­ton lead­ing Trump, 37% to 29%, and Gary John­son at 7%.
  • A Mc­Clatchy-Mar­ist poll gave Clin­ton a six-point edge, 45% to 39%, in a four-way bal­lot test. Johnson pulls 10% support, with Jill Stein at 4%.
  • Rasmussen, which has drawn criticism for continually showing Donald Trump doing much better than he does in other polls, is at it again. A new survey gives Trump a five-point lead, 44%-39%.
NO SURPRISE
Trump Eschewing Briefing Materials in Debate Prep
1 days ago
THE DETAILS

In contrast to Hillary Clinton's meticulous debate practice sessions, Donald Trump "is largely shun­ning tra­di­tion­al de­bate pre­par­a­tions, but has been watch­ing video of…Clin­ton’s best and worst de­bate mo­ments, look­ing for her vul­ner­ab­il­it­ies.” Trump “has paid only curs­ory at­ten­tion to brief­ing ma­ter­i­als. He has re­fused to use lecterns in mock de­bate ses­sions des­pite the ur­ging of his ad­visers. He prefers spit­balling ideas with his team rather than hon­ing them in­to crisp, two-minute an­swers.”

Source:
TRUMP NO HABLA ESPANOL
Trump Makes No Outreach to Spanish Speakers
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Donald Trump "is on the precipice of becoming the only major-party presidential candidate this century not to reach out to millions of American voters whose dominant, first or just preferred language is Spanish. Trump has not only failed to buy any Spanish-language television or radio ads, he so far has avoided even offering a translation of his website into Spanish, breaking with two decades of bipartisan tradition."

Source:
$1.16 MILLION
Clintons Buy the House Next Door in Chappaqua
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Bill and Hillary Clinton have purchased the home next door to their primary residence in tony Chappaqua, New York, for $1.16 million. "By purchasing the new home, the Clinton's now own the entire cul-de-sac at the end of the road in the leafy New York suburb. The purchase makes it easier for the United States Secret Service to protect the former president and possible future commander in chief."

Source:
×