Senate Bill Boosting Cybersecurity for Infrastructure Providers Expected Soon

Global Security Newswire Staff
See more stories about...
Global Security Newswire Staff
Oct. 9, 2013, 11:02 a.m.

A Sen­ate pan­el is “very close” to un­veil­ing cy­ber­se­cur­ity le­gis­la­tion aimed at help­ing and en­cour­aging crit­ic­al-in­fra­struc­ture pro­viders — in­clud­ing nuc­le­ar-power plants — to share more cy­ber-threat data with each oth­er and the gov­ern­ment, a top Re­pub­lic­an said Tues­day, ac­cord­ing to The Hill news­pa­per.

Sen­at­or Saxby Cham­b­liss (R-Ga.), the rank­ing mem­ber on the Sen­ate In­tel­li­gence Com­mit­tee, said at a cy­ber­se­cur­ity con­fer­ence in Wash­ing­ton that his pan­el is fi­nal­iz­ing a bill akin to the Cy­ber In­tel­li­gence Shar­ing and Pro­tec­tion Act, which the Re­pub­lic­an-led House passed in April. Sen­ate Demo­crats largely balked at that House le­gis­la­tion and the White House threatened to veto it, char­ging it would not sig­ni­fic­antly pro­tect cit­izens’ data pri­vacy.

Cham­b­liss non­ethe­less said he and In­tel­li­gence pan­el Chair­wo­man Di­anne Fein­stein (D-Cal­if.) are pro­ceed­ing with their sim­il­ar le­gis­la­tion, and cur­rently are hash­ing out the fi­nal de­tails, ac­cord­ing to The Hill. The GOP sen­at­or said he and Fein­stein have worked with Rep­res­ent­at­ives Mike Ro­gers (R-Mich.) and Dutch Rup­pers­ber­ger (D-Md.), who craf­ted the CISPA, in hopes of en­sur­ing if the Sen­ate bill passes the full cham­ber that it can be re­con­ciled with the House plan.

At the cy­ber con­fer­ence, sponsored by Politico, Cham­b­liss in­dic­ated a stick­ing point mem­bers of the Sen­ate In­tel­li­gence Com­mit­tee are still de­bat­ing: if and how their bill will grant im­munity pro­tec­tion to com­pan­ies that share cy­ber-threat data with the gov­ern­ment, ac­cord­ing to Politico. Cham­b­liss fur­ther said the Sen­ate In­tel­li­gence Com­mit­tee’s bill will call for es­tab­lish­ing a gov­ern­ment portal for the cy­ber-threat data com­ing from the private sec­tor, which likely would be part of the Home­land Se­cur­ity De­part­ment. However, he said he wants the Na­tion­al Se­cur­ity Agency to have ac­cess to the private-sec­tor in­form­a­tion  — something that could alarm pri­vacy ad­voc­ates.

“You can’t have pro­tec­tion from a cy­ber­se­cur­ity stand­point without the NSA be­ing in­teg­rally in­volved,” Cham­b­liss re­portedly said. “I mean, they’re the ex­perts.”

Cham­b­liss and oth­er law­makers said at the Tues­day New­seum event lamen­ted that the pace of cy­ber­se­cur­ity le­gis­la­tion has slowed on Cap­it­ol Hill since former NSA con­tract­or Ed­ward Snowden leaked in­tel­li­gence doc­u­ments re­gard­ing the agency’s wide­spread sur­veil­lance activ­it­ies.

Rep­res­ent­at­ive Jim Langev­in (D-R.I.) said he sus­pec­ted law­makers would not ad­dress sig­ni­fic­ant cy­ber­se­cur­ity le­gis­la­tion this year. “It’s very dif­fi­cult at this point,” he told Politico, “giv­en the gov­ern­ment shut­down and what happened as a res­ult” of Snowden.

Pres­id­ent Obama in Feb­ru­ary signed an ex­ec­ut­ive or­der in­ten­ded to im­ple­ment some as­pects of a cy­ber­se­cur­ity bill that died in the Sen­ate last year, which the U.S. Cham­ber of Com­merce ar­gued would have led to ex­cess­ive reg­u­la­tions on com­pan­ies. Obama’s ex­ec­ut­ive or­der calls for gov­ern­ment and in­dustry of­fi­cials to craft vol­un­tary cy­ber-threat stand­ards, and an early draft of them is due Oct. 12, ac­cord­ing to Politico.

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
These (Supposed) Iowa and NH Escorts Tell All
8 hours ago
NATIONAL JOURNAL AFTER DARK

Before we get to the specifics of this exposé about escorts working the Iowa and New Hampshire primary crowds, let’s get three things out of the way: 1.) It’s from Cosmopolitan; 2.) most of the women quoted use fake (if colorful) names; and 3.) again, it’s from Cosmopolitan. That said, here’s what we learned:

  • Business was booming: one escort who says she typically gets two inquiries a weekend got 15 requests in the pre-primary weekend.
  • Their primary season clientele is a bit older than normal—”40s through mid-60s, compared with mostly twentysomething regulars” and “they’ve clearly done this before.”
  • They seemed more nervous than other clients, because “the stakes are higher when you’re working for a possible future president” but “all practiced impeccable manners.”
  • One escort “typically enjoy[s] the company of Democrats more, just because I feel like our views line up a lot more.”
Source:
STATE VS. FEDERAL
Restoring Some Sanity to Encryption
8 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

No matter where you stand on mandating companies to include a backdoor in encryption technologies, it doesn’t make sense to allow that decision to be made on a state level. “The problem with state-level legislation of this nature is that it manages to be both wildly impractical and entirely unenforceable,” writes Brian Barrett at Wired. There is a solution to this problem. “California Congressman Ted Lieu has introduced the ‘Ensuring National Constitutional Rights for Your Private Telecommunications Act of 2016,’ which we’ll call ENCRYPT. It’s a short, straightforward bill with a simple aim: to preempt states from attempting to implement their own anti-encryption policies at a state level.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
What the Current Crop of Candidates Could Learn from JFK
8 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Hillary Is Running Against the Bill of 1992
8 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

The New Covenant. The Third Way. The Democratic Leadership Council style. Call it what you will, but whatever centrist triangulation Bill Clinton embraced in 1992, Hillary Clinton wants no part of it in 2016. Writing for Bloomberg, Sasha Issenberg and Margaret Talev explore how Hillary’s campaign has “diverged pointedly” from what made Bill so successful: “For Hillary to survive, Clintonism had to die.” Bill’s positions in 1992—from capital punishment to free trade—“represented a carefully calibrated diversion from the liberal orthodoxy of the previous decade.” But in New Hampshire, Hillary “worked to juggle nostalgia for past Clinton primary campaigns in the state with the fact that the Bill of 1992 or the Hillary of 2008 would likely be a marginal figure within today’s Democratic politics.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Trevor Noah Needs to Find His Voice. And Fast.
9 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

At first, “it was pleasant” to see Trevor Noah “smiling away and deeply dimpling in the Stewart seat, the seat that had lately grown gray hairs,” writes The Atlantic‘s James Parker in assessing the new host of the once-indispensable Daily Show. But where Jon Stewart was a heavyweight, Noah is “a very able lightweight, [who] needs time too. But he won’t get any. As a culture, we’re not about to nurture this talent, to give it room to grow. Our patience was exhausted long ago, by some other guy. We’re going to pass judgment and move on. There’s a reason Simon Cowell is so rich. Impress us today or get thee hence. So it comes to this: It’s now or never, Trevor.”

Source:
×