A large majority of Americans—nearly three in four—say they have not noticed effects of this year’s across-the-board spending cuts.
According to the latest United Technologies/National Journal Congressional Connection Poll, only 23 percent of respondents have “seen any impact of these cuts” in their communities or on them personally, while 74 percent said they had seen no impact from sequestration.
The results highlight a difficult issue for Democrats and the Obama administration in the broad fight over government spending: The budget cuts they decry not only haven’t exasperated the public, they’ve gone largely unnoticed. That means both parties’ political attacks over the sequester have less salience.
The poll results also are notable as Washington navigates the federal government shutdown and possible breach of the debt ceiling—two parallel crises carrying the potential of economic harm. While President Obama has stressed Senate Democrats’ acquiescence to what he called “Republican spending levels,” congressional Republicans are advocating another round of reductions in exchange for a debt-limit increase. Yet, absent reductions in Social Security or Medicare spending, it appears most Americans do not experience—or do not think they are experiencing—the effect of lower government spending.
Of the people who said they had noticed some sequester impact, the most common effect cited was “furloughs for federal workers you know.” Fifty-eight percent of that subset said they had noticed furloughs, while 54 percent said they had seen “cuts in government services you use,” and 45 percent said they themselves had seen “cuts in your paycheck or paychecks received by your family.”
College graduates were most likely to know a furloughed federal worker, with three-quarters of those who said they had noticed the sequester citing that particular effect. Respondents making less than $50,000 a year, meanwhile, were most likely among that subset to have noticed cuts to government services they use or to their families’ paychecks. Nonwhites were also more likely than other respondents to say that they had personally felt cuts in paychecks or services.
But again, relatively few respondents in each of those subgroups have even noticed sequestration to begin with. Just 21 percent of nonwhites, 23 percent of people earning less than $50,000 a year, and 25 percent of college graduates said they had noticed the cuts.
The United Technologies/National Journal Congressional Connection Poll was conducted Oct. 3-6 by Princeton Survey Research Associates International. The poll surveyed 1,000 adults, half via cell phone, and carries a margin of error of plus or minus 3.7 percentage points.
- 1 Hillary Clinton Will Win the Nomination, But Then What?
- 2 Would Obama’s Paid Sick Leave Proposal Actually Work? Look to San Francisco.
- 3 Do Republicans Believe in Global Warming? Not if They’re in the Tea Party
- 4 In the Iowa caucuses, look for results that surprise you
- 5 Paul Ryan Would Be the Most Conservative House Speaker in Recent History
What We're Following See More »
Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”
“We haven’t seen a true leftist since FDR, so many millions are coming out of the woodwork to vote for Bernie Sanders; he is the Occupy movement now come to life in the political arena.” So says Bill Maher in his Hollywood Reporter cover story (more a stream-of-consciousness riff than an essay, actually). Conservative states may never vote for a socialist in the general election, but “this stuff has never been on the table, and these voters have never been activated.” Maher saves most of his bile for Donald Trump and Sarah Palin, writing that by nominating Palin as vice president “John McCain is the one who opened the Book of the Dead and let the monsters out.” And Trump is picking up where Palin left off.