Washington’s Dysfunction Makes Local Officials Feel Pretty Good About Themselves

“We don’t have the luxury of shutting down…we’re still going to pick up your trash.”

National Journal
Nancy Cook
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Nancy Cook
Oct. 10, 2013, 10:42 a.m.

While con­gres­sion­al lead­ers in Wash­ing­ton bick­er over the gov­ern­ment shut­down and the mech­an­ics of rais­ing the debt ceil­ing for just a few weeks, the ma­jor­ity of city gov­ern­ments around the coun­try are sit­ting pretty — or, at least, in much bet­ter fin­an­cial situ­ations than they have been over the past five years. 

It’s a nice change from the lean years fol­low­ing the Great Re­ces­sion, when many cit­ies’ fin­ances were battered by fal­ter­ing loc­al hous­ing mar­kets, re­duced tax bases, aging in­fra­struc­ture, and grow­ing health­care and pen­sion ob­lig­a­tions. Today, 72 per­cent of city fin­ance of­ficers say that their cit­ies will be bet­ter off money-wise in 2013 than in 2012, ac­cord­ing to new re­search from the Na­tion­al League of Cit­ies, an ad­vocacy group that rep­res­ents more than 1,700 cit­ies across the coun­try.

What’s the cause for op­tim­ism? Well, it’s primar­ily based on in­creased rev­en­ue in the form of city in­come and sales taxes. In 2012 alone, city sales taxes rose by 6.2 per­cent, the re­search shows, a level not seen since the start of the re­ces­sion. City in­come taxes in­creased by 4.4 per­cent in 2012 and are pro­jec­ted to grow an­oth­er 2.3 per­cent in 2013.

On top of that, city of­fi­cials began to make tough choices in an ef­fort to bal­ance their budgets, ac­cord­ing to the League of Cit­ies’ data. Thirty-nine per­cent of city fin­an­cial of­ficers raised user fees to pay for city ser­vices; roughly one-quarter of cit­ies re­duced their share of health­care be­ne­fits or pen­sion ob­lig­a­tions for pub­lic em­ploy­ees. These are fin­an­cial choices that the fed­er­al gov­ern­ment is still strug­gling with as it wages yet an­oth­er battle over the fate of long-term spend­ing on Medi­care and So­cial Se­cur­ity, as well as the across-the-board spend­ing cuts known as se­quest­ra­tion.

All of this can make city of­fi­cials from around the coun­try look dis­par­agingly on the fed­er­al gov­ern­ment’s on­go­ing grid­lock. Just ask Ron­ald Green, the con­trol­ler of Hou­s­ton, a city that has got­ten its fisc­al house in or­der thanks to a di­verse loc­al eco­nomy that in­cludes a luc­rat­ive port, loc­al uni­versit­ies, and ma­jor health­care fa­cil­it­ies. “We don’t have the lux­ury of shut­ting down,” Green says. “Even with all of that go­ing on, we’re still go­ing to pick up your trash. You have 911 — someone is still go­ing to re­spond. If you turn on that wa­ter, it’s still go­ing to come on.”

Hou­s­ton has not yet had to make any ma­jor changes due to the on­go­ing gov­ern­ment shut­down, Green says — though in the com­ing weeks it may have to eval­u­ate some grant-fun­ded po­s­i­tions if the shut­down con­tin­ues.

This isn’t to say that cit­ies are in the clear in the long-run. They still face ma­jor hurdles from big-tick­et budget items like pen­sion and health­care costs for mu­ni­cip­al work­ers (see: De­troit, Mich.), not to men­tion in­fra­struc­ture that hasn’t been up­dated in years. But if any­one is point­ing fin­gers about who is be­ing pro­act­ive in tack­ling fin­an­cial quandar­ies and who’s dither­ing, then the city of­fi­cials win over the fed­er­al elec­ted of­fi­cials. After all, at least cit­ies man­age to pass their budgets year-after-year.

What We're Following See More »
PRESIDENT CALLS MEDICAID FUNDS A “BAILOUT”
Puerto Rico Another Sticking Point in Budget Talks
1 hours ago
THE DETAILS

President Trump’s portrayal of an effort to funnel more Medicaid dollars to Puerto Rico as a "bailout" is complicating negotiations over a continuing resolution on the budget. "House Democrats are now requiring such assistance as a condition for supporting the continuing resolution," a position that the GOP leadership is amenable to. "But Mr. Trump’s apparent skepticism aligns him with conservative House Republicans inclined to view its request as a bailout, leaving the deal a narrow path to passage in Congress."

Source:
SHUT DOWN MISLEADING FALSEHOODS
Facebook To Cut Down On Govt-Sponsored Info Campaigns
2 hours ago
BREAKING

Facebook "outlined new measures it is taking to combat what it calls 'information operations' that go well beyond the phenomenon known as fake news" on Thursday. Facebook acknowledged that there are governments using its platform as a tool to launch propaganda information campaigns and "manipulate public opinion in other countries. ... Facebook suspended 30,000 accounts in France ahead of last Sunday’s first-round presidential election."

Source:
POTENTIAL GOVERNMENT SHUTDOWN?
Democrats Threaten Spending Bill Over Obamacare
6 hours ago
BREAKING

Democrats in the House are threatening to shut down the government if Republicans expedite a vote on a bill to repeal and replace Obamacare, said Democratic House Whip Steny Hoyer Thursday. Lawmakers have introduced a one-week spending bill to give themselves an extra week to reach a long-term funding deal, which seemed poised to pass easily. However, the White House is pressuring House Republicans to take a vote on their Obamacare replacement Friday to give Trump a legislative victory, though it is still not clear that they have the necessary votes to pass the health care bill. This could go down to the wire.

Source:
IN 2014
Pentagon Warned Flynn Not To Accept Foreign Payments
7 hours ago
BREAKING
WOULD PUSH DEADLINE TO MAY 5
One-Week Spending Bill On The Table
8 hours ago
BREAKING

Members of Congress are eyeing a one-week spending bill which would keep the government open past the Friday night deadline, giving lawmakers an extra week to iron out a long-term deal to fund the government. Without any action, the government would run out of funding starting at midnight Saturday. “I am optimistic that a final funding package will be completed soon," said Rep. Rodney Frelinghuysen, R-N.J., chairman of the House Appropriations Committee.

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login