How Can You Run the Economy Without Any Data?

The government shutdown means no federal reports about inflation, employment, and a raft of other crucial metrics. Look out for uninformed decision-making.

Children race while crowling with blindfolds on. 
National Journal
Patrick Reis
See more stories about...
Patrick Reis
Oct. 10, 2013, 5 p.m.

Law­makers are walk­ing a dan­ger­ous path in the debt-ceil­ing stan­doff, and thanks to the gov­ern­ment shut­down, they’re walk­ing it in the dark.

When Re­pub­lic­ans last danced with de­fault in 2011, they did so ac­com­pan­ied by a steady stream of fed­er­al data to keep them ap­prised of the eco­nomy’s pro­gress. But this time, the gov­ern­ment eco­nom­ists and ana­lysts who pro­duce that data are fur­loughed, leav­ing Wash­ing­ton and Wall Street un­able to ac­cur­ately judge the health and value of the Amer­ic­an eco­nomy.

The first big, mar­ket-sens­it­ive re­port that nev­er showed up was last week’s Septem­ber jobs re­port. But it’s hardly the only one. Since the shut­down began Oct. 1, the fed­er­al gov­ern­ment has been un­able to is­sue one Census Bur­eau trade re­port, the bur­eau’s re­tail-sales re­port, a Labor De­part­ment re­lease on im­ports and ex­ports, the pro­du­cer price in­dex, and in­vent­or­ies data. Next up: the closely watched in­fla­tion as­sess­ment known as the con­sumer price in­dex (a re­port from the Bur­eau of Labor Stat­ist­ics that tracks the value of Amer­ic­ans’ paychecks) and data on home build­ing that can of­fer an early sign of com­ing booms or busts.

Wait, there’s more — and it’s worse. Next week is when the Census Bur­eau and BLS would be busy col­lect­ing data to meas­ure jobs and un­em­ploy­ment in Oc­to­ber, but be­cause the gov­ern­ment is shuttered, there will prob­ably be a two-month dis­rup­tion in know­ledge on the health of the job mar­ket. It would also be crunch time for eco­nom­ists at the Bur­eau of Eco­nom­ic Ana­lys­is, who are work­ing to de­liv­er the gross do­mest­ic product es­tim­ate by Oct. 30. “We are los­ing touch,” says Keith Hall, a former BLS com­mis­sion­er. “Good, com­pre­hens­ive data make de­cisions bet­ter and help people make few­er mis­takes. As this goes on, I think there’s a real chance of mis­takes.”

It’s not just Con­gress that will suf­fer for fly­ing blind: Fed­er­al data un­der­pin de­cisions that af­fect every as­pect of Amer­ic­an eco­nom­ic life, from Wall Street and the Fed­er­al Re­serve to farm fields and gar­age-based tech start-ups. (De­mand for this stuff trickles down from white-shoe banks and up from pub­lic high schools: The single most-viewed in­form­a­tion on the BLS web­site has al­ways been the oc­cu­pa­tion data, Hall says, a fa­vor­ite of high school guid­ance coun­selors look­ing to get their stu­dents off to a good start in the job mar­ket.)

But per­haps most im­port­ant, the re­ports help keep the glob­al fin­an­cial sys­tem re­li­ably func­tion­al. While miss­ing a week of num­bers is not apo­ca­lyptic, busi­ness lead­ers will get nervous if the data black­out con­tin­ues. “It really para­lyzes de­cision mak­ing,” says Joseph La­Vor­gna, chief U.S. eco­nom­ist for Deutsche Bank. “In the ab­sence of the fed­er­al re­ports, people have to rely on lower-qual­ity in­form­a­tion, and they likely don’t trans­act as much, they don’t in­vest as much.” How does a bank hedge against a subprime-mort­gage crisis when it can’t know how many risky home loans were is­sued?

The sud­den va­cu­um comes at a par­tic­u­larly in­op­por­tune time, as Wash­ing­ton’s dual crises have the po­ten­tial to drive ma­jor changes to the U.S. eco­nomy — and drive them quickly. This has happened be­fore. In 2011’s debt-ceil­ing battle, the stock mar­ket, see­ing a de­fault threat in the United States and a sov­er­eign-debt crisis in Europe, plunged as the Aug. 2 debt-ceil­ing dead­line ap­proached and Wash­ing­ton re­mained dead­locked. The Dow Jones in­dus­tri­al av­er­age began slid­ing Ju­ly 22, and the losses wer­en’t erased un­til this Janu­ary. (See “Break­ing Bernanke’s Heart.”)

So far, Con­gress has been get­ting mixed feed­back on the eco­nom­ic con­sequences of its brink­man­ship. Stock in­dexes haven’t re­peated their 2011 plunge yet, but buy­ers are flock­ing to Treas­ury bills, a stable but low-yield as­set whose re­newed pop­ular­ity sug­gests that in­vestors are get­ting in­creas­ingly nervous. Mean­while, on con­sumer con­fid­ence, the con­sequences are as clear as they are dis­cour­aging: A Gal­lup Poll re­leased last week found con­fid­ence had cratered since the shut­down, fall­ing to its low­est level since 2009, when Amer­ic­ans were ex­per­i­en­cing mass lay­offs and the fin­an­cial crisis put the eco­nomy on the brink of col­lapse.

None of these sig­nals come close to ad­equately re­pla­cing fed­er­al re­ports on the eco­nomy’s un­der­ly­ing fun­da­ment­als. “It’s def­in­itely a par­tial sub­sti­tute,” says Tara Sin­clair, a George Wash­ing­ton Uni­versity eco­nom­ist. “We all look at the gov­ern­ment num­bers as the gold stand­ard. Some of these private-sec­tor re­ports come in more quickly, but then they have to go back and bench­mark to the gov­ern­ment num­bers.”

Some data re­main avail­able — the Treas­ury De­part­ment is still is­su­ing the Daily Treas­ury State­ment, for ex­ample. But it’s not nearly enough to flesh out a pic­ture of the state of the U.S. eco­nomy. Even the still-op­er­at­ing Fed­er­al Re­serve will have a prob­lem ana­lyz­ing be­cause much of its in­put comes from data pro­duced by fed­er­al agen­cies.

That means politi­cians and in­vestors are left to stitch to­geth­er scraps of in­form­a­tion and guess­tim­ate the eco­nomy’s size and well-be­ing, cre­at­ing the pos­sib­il­ity (prob­ab­il­ity, even) that a siz­able gap emerges between per­cep­tion and real­ity. And the longer the gov­ern­ment is shut down, the wider that gap could grow.

What We're Following See More »
LOTS OF STRINGERS
Inside the AP’s Election Operation
4 hours ago
WHY WE CARE
THE QUESTION
What’s the Average Household Income of a Trump Voter?
4 hours ago
THE ANSWER

Seventy-two thousand dollars, according to FiveThirtyEight. That's higher than the national average, as well as the average Clinton or Sanders voter, but lower than the average Kasich voter.

Source:
VERY FEW DEMS NOW REPRESENT MINING COMMUNITIES
How Coal Country Went from Blue to Red
6 hours ago
WHY WE CARE
STAFF PICKS
History Already Being Less Kind to Hastert’s Leadership
9 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

In light of his recent confessions, the speakership of Dennis Hastert is being judged far more harshly. The New York Times' Carl Hulse notes that in hindsight, Hastert now "fares poorly" on a number of fronts, from his handling of the Mark Foley page scandal to "an explosion" of earmarks to the weakening of committee chairmen. "Even his namesake Hastert rule—the informal standard that no legislation should be brought to a vote without the support of a majority of the majority — has come to be seen as a structural barrier to compromise."

Source:
‘STARTING FROM ZERO’
Trump Ill Prepared for General Election
9 hours ago
THE DETAILS

Even if "[t]he Republican presidential nomination may be in his sights ... Trump has so far ignored vital preparations needed for a quick and effective transition to the general election. The New York businessman has collected little information about tens of millions of voters he needs to turn out in the fall. He's sent few people to battleground states compared with likely Democratic rival Hillary Clinton, accumulated little if any research on her, and taken no steps to build a network capable of raising the roughly $1 billion needed to run a modern-day general election campaign."

Source:
×