U.S. Carbon-Dioxide Emissions Fell 11 Percent Since 2007

The recession played a part, but so did a change in the way Americans use energy.

National Journal
Brian Resnick
Oct. 11, 2013, 5:41 a.m.

Emis­sions fig­ures are in mil­lion tons of car­bon; for tons of CO2, mul­tiply by 44/12. Source: Com­piled by Earth Policy In­sti­tute with 1950-1993 from “Car­bon Di­ox­ide Emis­sions from En­ergy Con­sump­tion by Source, 1949-2011,” Table 11.1 in U.S. (Bri­an Mc­Gill)Between 2007 and 2011, the amount of car­bon di­ox­ide the United States spewed in­to the air de­creased by 2 mil­lion tons, or 11 per­cent. Ac­count­ing for part of the de­crease, ex­plains the Earth Policy In­sti­tute, is the re­ces­sion. When the eco­nomy slows, car­bon emis­sions slow with it. But our habits have changed as well, and in the past few years Amer­ica really has got­ten “green­er.”

Cars have be­come more ef­fi­cient, and emis­sions from oil are down about 100 mil­lion tons since the middle of the last dec­ade. We’re also driv­ing less — na­tion­al miles driv­en peaked in 2007. Now, the Earth Policy In­sti­tute ex­plains, “more cars stay parked be­cause more people live in urb­an areas, opt for pub­lic trans­it, work re­motely, or re­tire and thus no longer com­mute to work.” Factor in the de­cline of coal power, and the small but sig­ni­fic­ant rise of wind en­ergy, and the U.S. is 11 per­cent green­er than it was just a few years ago. 

And this happened, more or less, without a con­cer­ted fed­er­al ef­fort. “U.S. car­bon emis­sions have de­clined at an im­press­ive rate giv­en the ab­sence of any co­hes­ive fed­er­al cli­mate-change policy,” the Yale For­um on Cli­mate Change ex­plains. “The U.S. has ac­tu­ally man­aged to make sig­ni­fic­ant pro­gress to­ward its long-aban­doned Kyoto Pro­tocol tar­get to re­duce emis­sions 7 per­cent be­low 1990 levels.”

Gran­ted, even though the levels have dropped, car­bon di­ox­ide con­tin­ues to ac­cu­mu­late in the at­mo­sphere. There is cer­tainly more CO2 in the air today than there was in 2007 (and while the U.S. is a ma­jor source of green­house gas emis­sions — about 16 per­cent — it cer­tainly isn’t the only one).

But this is a prom­ising trend con­sid­er­ing re­cent re­search from the journ­al Nature that pre­dicts when cli­mate change will have fun­da­ment­ally altered loc­al cli­mates. The study spells out two di­ver­ging scen­ari­os for Earth. One is busi­ness as usu­al, in which cit­ies like Wash­ing­ton and New York will have a rad­ic­ally altered cli­mate (di­ver­ging from long-his­tor­ic­al norms) by 2047. But if we sig­ni­fic­antly re­duce the amount of car­bon emis­sions, that date could stretch to 2072.

The de­veloped na­tions of the world will have to lead the way, the re­port con­cludes, as the first coun­tries to feel the im­pacts of cli­mate change will be poorer na­tions in trop­ic­al cli­mates. The au­thors write:

… any pro­gress to de­crease the rate of on­go­ing cli­mate change will re­quire a big­ger com­mit­ment from de­veloped coun­tries to de­crease their emis­sions but will also re­quire more ex­tens­ive fund­ing of so­cial and con­ser­va­tion pro­grams in de­vel­op­ing coun­tries to min­im­ize the im­pacts of cli­mate change. Our res­ults on the pro­jec­ted tim­ing of cli­mate de­par­ture from re­cent vari­ab­il­ity shed light on the ur­gency of mit­ig­at­ing green­house-gas emis­sions if wide­spread changes in glob­al biod­iversity and hu­man so­ci­et­ies are to be pre­ven­ted.

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
When It Comes to Mining Asteroids, Technology Is Only the First Problem
19 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Foreign Policy takes a look at the future of mining the estimated "100,000 near-Earth objects—including asteroids and comets—in the neighborhood of our planet. Some of these NEOs, as they’re called, are small. Others are substantial and potentially packed full of water and various important minerals, such as nickel, cobalt, and iron. One day, advocates believe, those objects will be tapped by variations on the equipment used in the coal mines of Kentucky or in the diamond mines of Africa. And for immense gain: According to industry experts, the contents of a single asteroid could be worth trillions of dollars." But the technology to get us there is only the first step. Experts say "a multinational body might emerge" to manage rights to NEOs, as well as a body of law, including an international court.

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Obama Reflects on His Economic Record
20 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Not to be outdone by Jeffrey Goldberg's recent piece in The Atlantic about President Obama's foreign policy, the New York Times Magazine checks in with a longread on the president's economic legacy. In it, Obama is cognizant that the economic reality--73 straight months of growth--isn't matched by public perceptions. Some of that, he says, is due to a constant drumbeat from the right that "that denies any progress." But he also accepts some blame himself. “I mean, the truth of the matter is that if we had been able to more effectively communicate all the steps we had taken to the swing voter,” he said, “then we might have maintained a majority in the House or the Senate.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Reagan Families, Allies Lash Out at Will Ferrell
21 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Ronald Reagan's children and political allies took to the media and Twitter this week to chide funnyman Will Ferrell for his plans to play a dementia-addled Reagan in his second term in a new comedy entitled Reagan. In an open letter, Reagan's daughter Patti Davis tells Ferrell, who's also a producer on the movie, “Perhaps for your comedy you would like to visit some dementia facilities. I have—I didn’t find anything comedic there, and my hope would be that if you’re a decent human being, you wouldn’t either.” Michael Reagan, the president's son, tweeted, "What an Outrag....Alzheimers is not joke...It kills..You should be ashamed all of you." And former Rep. Joe Walsh called it an example of "Hollywood taking a shot at conservatives again."

Source:
PEAK CONFIDENCE
Clinton No Longer Running Primary Ads
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

In a sign that she’s ready to put a longer-than-ex­pec­ted primary battle be­hind her, former Sec­ret­ary of State Hil­lary Clin­ton (D) is no longer go­ing on the air in up­com­ing primary states. “Team Clin­ton hasn’t spent a single cent in … Cali­for­nia, In­di­ana, Ken­tucky, Ore­gon and West Vir­gin­ia, while” Sen. Bernie Sanders’ (I-VT) “cam­paign has spent a little more than $1 mil­lion in those same states.” Meanwhile, Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR), Sanders’ "lone back­er in the Sen­ate, said the can­did­ate should end his pres­id­en­tial cam­paign if he’s los­ing to Hil­lary Clin­ton after the primary sea­son con­cludes in June, break­ing sharply with the can­did­ate who is vow­ing to take his in­sur­gent bid to the party con­ven­tion in Phil­adelphia.”

Source:
CITIZENS UNITED PT. 2?
Movie Based on ‘Clinton Cash’ to Debut at Cannes
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

The team behind the bestselling "Clinton Cash"—author Peter Schweizer and Breitbart's Stephen Bannon—is turning the book into a movie that will have its U.S. premiere just before the Democratic National Convention this summer. The film will get its global debut "next month in Cannes, France, during the Cannes Film Festival. (The movie is not a part of the festival, but will be shown at a screening arranged for distributors)." Bloomberg has a trailer up, pointing out that it's "less Ken Burns than Jerry Bruckheimer, featuring blood-drenched money, radical madrassas, and ominous footage of the Clintons."

Source:
×