Factions are forming within the conservative wing of the House GOP, with like-minded members splitting over a proposed six-week extension of the debt limit — and plenty of others sitting on the fence.
In this morning’s closed-door GOP conference meeting, lines were drawn as conservative members rose to argue both sides of the proposed deal. Rep. Raul Labrador of Idaho emerged as the leading advocate for the proposal, according to multiple lawmakers in attendance. On the other side, Rep. Tim Huelskamp of Kansas was perhaps the most outspoken opponent.
At the heart of the disagreement is a longstanding covenant among conservatives — reiterated yesterday by Republican Study Committee Chairman Steve Scalise — that they should never vote for a “clean” debt limit increase, regardless of length or circumstance.
“We’d prefer a long-term deal,” Scalise said Wednesday, when asked whether conservatives would approve a temporary debt limit increase. “But if we need to do something short-term, we should have the corresponding reforms.”
For months, conservatives have argued that something — anything — must be attached to a debt ceiling deal. Their primary target has been mandatory spending; Republicans spent the summer months drafting a “menu” of entitlement reforms to offer the White House in exchange for various extensions. With the White House desperate to avoid default, the thinking went, Republicans would have leverage.
But the situation is far more complicated than they foresaw. The federal government is shuttered due to Republican insistence on attaching an Affordable Care Act delay to the funding bill; at the same time, Congress is rapidly approaching next Thursday’s deadline to raise the debt ceiling.
President Obama is refusing to negotiate with Republicans until both crises are resolved. Some House conservatives think he’s bluffing. That group, led by Labrador, is convinced that if they temporarily raise the debt ceiling — allowing them to dig in deeper on the shutdown — they will break Obama’s no-negotiation stance. If that happens, they think, concessions could be won on Obamacare that would solve the funding fight and reopen the government. Meanwhile, they would still have Obama at the negotiating table to discuss a long-term debt-limit deal featuring the cuts to entitlement spending that they have long desired.
But without any binding language in the House proposal, Obama could easily agree to sign that short-term debt-limit deal before turning around and demanding that a funding bill must also pass before negotiations begin. Should that happen, conservatives would feel doubly duped — forfeiting what was left of their negotiating leverage, and abandoning their debt-ceiling principles to boot.
This sense of uncertainty, amplified by a deep distrust conservatives feel for the White House, has Labrador pitching a proposal that some of his fellow conservatives aren’t sold on.
Rep. Justin Amash of Michigan, who is perhaps Labrador’s closest friend in Congress, said he — like many other conservatives — is on the fence. They have heard arguments for and against the plan, but aren’t willing to stake out a position until they see the language of the final bill.
“I’ve always said that I would support a debt-ceiling increase only if it’s coupled with major reforms to government. I had never really considered things like one-week debt ceiling increases, or one-month debt ceiling increases,” Amash said.
- 1 House Ethics Panel Won’t Take Action Against Petri, Hastings
- 2 Emails May Be a Key to Addressing ‘Pay-to-Play’ Whispers at Clinton Foundation
- 3 The (Still) Treacherous Politics of Criminal-Justice Reform
- 4 Which Candidates Are Taking Uber to Luxury Hotels?
- 5 Flint Crisis Exposes Messy Politics of Disaster Relief
What We're Following See More »
Under pressure from a judge, the State Department will release about 550 of Hillary Clinton’s emails—“roughly 14 percent of the 3,700 remaining Clinton emails—on Saturday, in the middle of the Presidents Day holiday weekend.” All of the emails were supposed to have been released last month. Related: State subpoenaed the Clinton Foundation last year, which brings the total number of current Clinton investigations to four, says the Daily Caller.
UPDATED: Sen. Jim Webb (D-VA) will not be playing the role of Ralph Nader in this year’s election. Speaking in Dallas today, Webb said, “We looked at the possibility of an independent candidacy. Theoretically, it could be done, but it is enormously costly and time sensitive, and I don’t see the fundraising trajectory where we could make a realistic run.”
“The leaders of the Republican and Democratic national committees on Wednesday weighed in on the prospect of an independent presidential run by” former New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg (I). “DNC Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz suggested that the former New York City mayor’s priorities are already ‘well cared-for’ in the Democratic platform, while RNC leader Reince Priebus welcomed the idea, saying Bloomberg would siphon off votes from the Democratic candidate.”
Three hundred fifty-two, thanks to superdelegates pledged to Clinton, and the vagaries of the delegate allocation process in early states. Not bad, considering her results have been a virtual tie and a blowout loss.