George W. Bush’s recent heart problems were far more dangerous than generally believed — potentially life-threatening, in fact.
Sources familiar with the former president’s medical situation told National Journal that a major blockage in a coronary artery discovered during Bush’s annual physical exam in August had almost completely shut off blood flow to one of his heart chambers.
“He was more than 95% occluded,” an authoritative source said. “With a blockage like that in a main artery you’re supposed to die. He was pretty lucky they caught it.”
Dr. Jonathan Reiner, an interventional cardiologist at George Washington University who has treated former Vice President Dick Cheney but was not involved in Bush’s care, noted that a blockage of that magnitude wouldn’t necessarily be fatal in all patients but is a very serious situation requiring prompt treatment.
“Every case is different,” Reinert said. “It depends on several factors, including how quickly a blockage has developed. But it’s a very important vessel. If you occlude that particular artery it can kill you.”
A prominent internist who asked not to be identified added that Bush’s blockage, if undiagnosed, would almost certainly have risked “a grave cardiac event.”
Even with a 95 percent blockage, Reiner said, blood will still be flowing through the impaired artery, but the heart muscle must work harder, particularly during vigorous activity. The added strain when blood flow is diminished can lead to serious cardiac complications, including a heart attack.
The 43rd president has exercised regularly for years and is generally believed to be in excellent health. Nevertheless, a stress test that’s standard with all physicals at the renowned Cooper Clinic in Dallas turned up worrisome changes to Bush’s electrocardiogram readings. His physicians quickly ordered up a CT angiogram that revealed the magnitude of the blockage and prompted them to recommend inserting a stent to open the artery. That procedure was done the next morning at Texas Health Presbyterian Hospital without complication. Bush spent the night at the hospital for observation and is reported to be recovering normally.
At the time some physicians wondered whether the stent was medical overkill, given that Bush has no known family history of heart disease and is in good shape. Multiple sources knowledgeable about Bush’s condition, however, said there’s no question the treatment was medically necessary.
A spokesman for the Cooper Clinic declined to discuss any aspects of Bush’s care, citing patient privacy. Bush spokesman Freddy Ford also declined comment.
By all appearances, the ex-president has bounced back smartly from his health scare. He’s been cleared to travel, attending the President’s Cup golf matches in Ohio last weekend. He’s also returned to playing golf and riding mountain bikes, but doctors have put limits on his normally-manic speeds and the duration of his workouts.
“He’s back on the bike — easy, not hard,” a friend said. “But he’s feeling terrific and doing fine.”
What We're Following See More »
The Commission on Presidential Debates put out a statement today that gives credence to Donald Trump's claims that he had a bad microphone on Monday night. "Regarding the first debate, there were issues regarding Donald Trump's audio that affected the sound level in the debate hall," read the statement in its entirety.
"A video of Donald Trump testifying under oath about his provocative rhetoric about Mexicans and other Latinos is set to go public" as soon as today. "Trump gave the testimony in June at a law office in Washington in connection with one of two lawsuits he filed last year after prominent chefs reacted to the controversy over his remarks by pulling out of plans to open restaurants at his new D.C. hotel. D.C. Superior Court Judge Brian Holeman said in an order issued Thursday evening that fears the testimony might show up in campaign commercials were no basis to keep the public from seeing the video."
No matter that his recall of foreign leaders leaves something to be desired, Gary Johnson is the choice of the Chicago Tribune's editorial board. The editors argue that Donald Trump couldn't do the job of president, while hitting Hillary Clinton for "her intent to greatly increase federal spending and taxation, and serious questions about honesty and trust." Which leaves them with Johnson. "Every American who casts a vote for him is standing for principles," they write, "and can be proud of that vote. Yes, proud of a candidate in 2016."
"By all means vote, just not for Donald Trump." That's the message from USA Today editors, who are making the first recommendation on a presidential race in the paper's 34-year history. It's not exactly an endorsement; they make clear that the editorial board "does not have a consensus for a Clinton endorsement." But they state flatly that Donald Trump is, by "unanimous consensus of the editorial board, unfit for the presidency."