The Federal Bureau of Investigation’s facial-recognition technology, used to identify individuals and assist in investigations, could fail one in every five times it is used, new documents show.
A 2010 report recently made public by the Electronic Privacy Information Center through a Freedom of Information Act request states that the facial-recognition technology “shall return an incorrect candidate a maximum of 20% of the time.” When the technology is used against a searchable repository, it “shall return the correct candidate a minimum of 85% of the time.”
“An innocent person may become part of an investigation because the technology isn’t completely accurate,” said Jeramie Scott, an attorney with EPIC who reviewed the documents, citing the Boston Marathon bombings as an example. “They’re pushing it forward even though the technology isn’t ready for prime time.”
FBI officials could not be reached for comment, perhaps owing to the government shutdown.
The numbers posted by facial-recognition software compare unfavorably with other identification techniques used as part of the bureau’s Next Generation Identification program, including fingerprinting, which yields an accurate match 99 percent of the time when combing a database, and iris scans, which field correct matches 98 percent of the time.
Currently, no federal laws limit the use of facial-recognition software by private-sector companies or the government, and it is used in varied applications, from law enforcement, to social networks and by motor vehicle departments in several states.
Last year, Sen. Al Franken, D-Minn., expressed concern during a Senate Judiciary subcommittee hearing that facial-recognition technology could be used to violate a person’s privacy without their knowledge.
In terms of law enforcement, the failure rate may undermine the FBI’s intention to use next-generation technology to identify criminal suspects being sought in active investigations, Scott said.
Documents dug up by EPIC earlier this year revealed a Homeland Security Department initiative known as the Biometric Optical Surveillance System that is working to use computers and cameras to quickly scan crowds and identify people. Though face-scanning technology has improved dramatically in recent years — as demonstrated by Facebook, which for years has featured an “auto-tag” feature that scans uploaded photos — accurately pulling a face from a crowd is still a difficult challenge.
Jerome Pender, who was then the deputy assistant director of the FBI’s criminal-justice information services division, told Congress last year that the bureau was planning to update its 2008 Privacy Impact Assessment, which would “address all evolutionary changes” in the use of facial-recognition technology over the past several years. But the FBI has yet to release a revised assessment, Scott said.
What We're Following See More »
President Obama became a surprise topic of contention toward the end of the Democratic debate, as Hillary Clinton reminded viewers that Sanders had challenged the progressive bona fides of President Obama in 2011 and suggested that someone might challenge him from the left. “The kind of criticism that we’ve heard from Senator Sanders about our president I expect from Republicans, I do not expect from someone running for the Democratic nomination to succeed President Obama,” she said. “Madame Secretary, that is a low blow,” replied Sanders, before getting in another dig during his closing statement: “One of us ran against Barack Obama. I was not that candidate.”
It’s all about the 1% and Wall Street versus everyone else for Bernie Sanders—even when he’s talking about race relations. Like Hillary Clinton, he needs to appeal to African-American and Hispanic voters in coming states, but he insists on doing so through his lens of class warfare. When he got a question from the moderators about the plight of black America, he noted that during the great recession, African Americans “lost half their wealth,” and “instead of tax breaks for billionaires,” a Sanders presidency would deliver jobs for kids. On the very next question, he downplayed the role of race in inequality, saying, “It’s a racial issue, but it’s also a general economic issue.”
It’s been said in just about every news story since New Hampshire: the primaries are headed to states where Hillary Clinton will do well among minority voters. Leaving nothing to chance, she underscored that point in her opening statement in the Milwaukee debate tonight, saying more needs to be done to help “African Americans who face discrimination in the job market” and immigrant families. She also made an explicit reference to “equal pay for women’s work.” Those boxes she’s checking are no coincidence: if she wins women, blacks and Hispanics, she wins the nomination.
Under pressure from a judge, the State Department will release about 550 of Hillary Clinton’s emails—“roughly 14 percent of the 3,700 remaining Clinton emails—on Saturday, in the middle of the Presidents Day holiday weekend.” All of the emails were supposed to have been released last month. Related: State subpoenaed the Clinton Foundation last year, which brings the total number of current Clinton investigations to four, says the Daily Caller.