The Federal Bureau of Investigation’s facial-recognition technology, used to identify individuals and assist in investigations, could fail one in every five times it is used, new documents show.
A 2010 report recently made public by the Electronic Privacy Information Center through a Freedom of Information Act request states that the facial-recognition technology “shall return an incorrect candidate a maximum of 20% of the time.” When the technology is used against a searchable repository, it “shall return the correct candidate a minimum of 85% of the time.”
“An innocent person may become part of an investigation because the technology isn’t completely accurate,” said Jeramie Scott, an attorney with EPIC who reviewed the documents, citing the Boston Marathon bombings as an example. “They’re pushing it forward even though the technology isn’t ready for prime time.”
FBI officials could not be reached for comment, perhaps owing to the government shutdown.
The numbers posted by facial-recognition software compare unfavorably with other identification techniques used as part of the bureau’s Next Generation Identification program, including fingerprinting, which yields an accurate match 99 percent of the time when combing a database, and iris scans, which field correct matches 98 percent of the time.
Currently, no federal laws limit the use of facial-recognition software by private-sector companies or the government, and it is used in varied applications, from law enforcement, to social networks and by motor vehicle departments in several states.
Last year, Sen. Al Franken, D-Minn., expressed concern during a Senate Judiciary subcommittee hearing that facial-recognition technology could be used to violate a person’s privacy without their knowledge.
In terms of law enforcement, the failure rate may undermine the FBI’s intention to use next-generation technology to identify criminal suspects being sought in active investigations, Scott said.
Documents dug up by EPIC earlier this year revealed a Homeland Security Department initiative known as the Biometric Optical Surveillance System that is working to use computers and cameras to quickly scan crowds and identify people. Though face-scanning technology has improved dramatically in recent years — as demonstrated by Facebook, which for years has featured an “auto-tag” feature that scans uploaded photos — accurately pulling a face from a crowd is still a difficult challenge.
Jerome Pender, who was then the deputy assistant director of the FBI’s criminal-justice information services division, told Congress last year that the bureau was planning to update its 2008 Privacy Impact Assessment, which would “address all evolutionary changes” in the use of facial-recognition technology over the past several years. But the FBI has yet to release a revised assessment, Scott said.
What We're Following See More »
"Like Donald Trump himself, the Trump campaign’s new national finance chairman has a long history of contributing to Democrats—including Hillary Clinton. Private investor Steven Mnuchin, Trump’s new campaign fundraising guru, has contributed more than $120,000" to candidates since 1995, about half of which has gone to Democrats.
Paul Ryan told CNN today he's "not ready" to back Donald Trump at this time. "I'm not there right now," he said. Ryan said Trump needs to unify "all wings of the Republican Party and the conservative movement" and then run a campaign that will allow Americans to "have something that they're proud to support and proud to be a part of. And we've got a ways to go from here to there."
The Daily Beast has unearthed a piece that Donald Trump wrote for Gear magazine in 2000, which anticipates his 2016 sales pitch quite well. "Perhaps it's time for a dealmaker who can get the leaders of Congress to the table, forge consensus, and strike compromise," he writes. Oddly, he opens by defending his reputation as a womanizer: "The hypocrites argue that a man who loves and appreciates beautiful women (and does so legally and openly) shouldn't become a national leader? Is there something wrong with appreciating beautiful women? Don't we want people in public office who show signs of life?"
An aide to Mitt Romney confirmed to the Washington Post that the 2102 GOP nominee will not attend the Republican convention this year. He joins the two living Republican presidents, George W. Bush and George H.W. Bush, as well as 2008 nominee John McCain in skipping the event. Even among living Republican nominees, that leaves only Bob Dole who could conceivably show up. Dole did say in January that he'd prefer Trump to Ted Cruz, but his age (92) could keep him from attending.