Iran Reportedly Signals Openness to Key Uranium Curbs

Global Security Newswire Staff
See more stories about...
Global Security Newswire Staff
Oct. 16, 2013, 11:02 a.m.

En­voys on Wed­nes­day said Ir­a­ni­an ne­go­ti­at­ors this week voiced a tent­at­ive open­ness to di­al­ing back their na­tion’s dis­puted urani­um re­fine­ment activ­it­ies in re­turn for curbs on in­ter­na­tion­al fin­an­cial pen­al­ties, Re­u­ters re­por­ted.

Still, West­ern gov­ern­ment in­siders said it was un­clear if the Per­sian Gulf power would take steps ne­ces­sary to dis­pel fears that it is pur­su­ing a nuc­le­ar-bomb cap­ab­il­ity. Few spe­cif­ics have sur­faced pub­licly on an atom­ic com­prom­ise pro­pos­al put for­ward by Tehran at a two-day mul­ti­lat­er­al meet­ing com­pleted in Geneva on Wed­nes­day.

One West­ern en­voy said new plans are in place for a fol­low-up Nov. 7-8 meet­ing between Ir­a­ni­an dip­lo­mats and coun­ter­parts from the five per­man­ent U.N. Se­cur­ity Coun­cil mem­ber na­tions and Ger­many — the so-called “P-5+1.”

Ir­a­ni­an For­eign Min­is­ter Mo­hammad Javad Za­rif wrote on Face­book that be­fore the next round of talks in Novem­ber the six oth­er ne­go­ti­at­ing powers will have “a chance to ac­quire the ne­ces­sary read­i­ness re­gard­ing the de­tails of Ir­an’s plans and the steps that they must take,” the New York Times re­por­ted.

EU for­eign policy chief Cath­er­ine Ashton said this week’s meet­ing, held on Tues­day and Wed­nes­day, was the “most de­tailed” to date on the nuc­le­ar dis­pute, the BBC re­por­ted.

In a joint state­ment, Za­rif and Ashton said Ir­an’s pro­pos­al “is be­ing care­fully con­sidered by the [P-5+1] as an im­port­ant con­tri­bu­tion.”

Ab­bas Araq­chi, one of Za­rif’s depu­ties, said Tehran pro­posed ini­tially ac­cept­ing cer­tain urani­um-en­rich­ment re­stric­tions with­in half a year in ex­change for par­tial curbs on pun­it­ive eco­nom­ic meas­ures, the Lon­don Guard­i­an re­por­ted on Wed­nes­day. Wash­ing­ton and its al­lies doubt Tehran’s long­time as­ser­tion that it only wants to en­rich urani­um to re­l­at­ively low levels for use in power plants and re­search re­act­ors.

A second phase would en­tail a num­ber of un­dis­closed con­fid­ence-build­ing meas­ures. In a fi­nal step, Ir­an would ac­cept more ag­gress­ive in­ter­na­tion­al audit­ing to help en­sure it is not di­vert­ing nuc­le­ar ma­ter­i­al for mil­it­ary activ­it­ies, while oth­er coun­tries would lift re­main­ing pen­al­ties and al­low Ir­a­ni­an urani­um en­rich­ment to con­tin­ue with­in es­tab­lished bound­ar­ies.

Tehran has no plan to stop en­rich­ing urani­um at its Qum and Natanz sites, the Los Angeles Times on Tues­day quoted Araq­chi as say­ing in re­marks to Ir­a­ni­an state me­dia.

Tim­ing for vari­ous steps re­mains a po­ten­tial snag for ne­go­ti­at­ors, ac­cord­ing to Re­u­ters. West­ern gov­ern­ment of­fi­cials have said eco­nom­ic pen­al­ties should re­main in place un­til Tehran stops pro­du­cing 20 per­cent-en­riched urani­um, which can quickly be con­ver­ted to bomb fuel.

Brit­ish For­eign Min­is­ter Wil­li­am Hag­ue said: “We are not today in a po­s­i­tion to make any changes in those sanc­tions. Sanc­tions must con­tin­ue. Sanc­tions are im­port­ant part of bring­ing Ir­an to the ne­go­ti­at­ing table.”

However, Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion in­siders said Wash­ing­ton is will­ing to un­freeze cer­tain Ir­a­ni­an for­eign cur­rency re­serves in re­turn for con­crete steps by Tehran, Bloomberg re­por­ted on Wed­nes­day.

At the U.S. De­fense De­part­ment, of­fi­cials on Monday said they want to sell Saudi Ar­a­bia and the United Ar­ab Emir­ates $10.8 bil­lion in air-fired cruise mis­siles and oth­er weapons, Bloomberg re­por­ted. Arms in the pro­posed pack­ages are cap­able of hit­ting air de­fenses and radar sites in Ir­an and else­where, the news agency said.

What We're Following See More »
11 HOUSE MEMBERS NOW BEHIND HIM
Two Committee Chairs Endorse Trump
14 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Two powerful House members—Transportation and Infrastructure Committee Chairman Bill Shuster (R-PA) and Veterans Affairs Committee Chair Jeff Miller (R-FL)—are throwing their support behind Donald Trump.

Source:
BUT WOULD HE THROW THE CHAIR?
Bobby Knight: Trump Would Drop the Bomb Just Like Truman
14 hours ago
THE LATEST
LAST PLACE
Trump Still Struggling for Endorsements
17 hours ago
WHY WE CARE
MORE INDEPENDENTS, FEWER SUPERDELEGATES
Sanders Could Force Changes to Nominating Process
20 hours ago
THE LATEST

There are not "ongoing, direct conversations between" the Bernie Sanders camp and the Hillary Clinton camp regarding "the platform or rules changes," but Sanders "is already making his opening arguments" about those issues on the stump. Sanders is putting "complaints about closed primaries" atop his stump speeches lately, and figures to start a "conversation about the role of superdelegates in the nominating process." He said, “Our goal, whether we win or we do not win, is to transform the Democratic Party."

Source:
‘LUCIFER IN THE FLESH’
Boehner Says He Wouldn’t Vote for Cruz
21 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Well, this is unsubtle. Former Speaker John Boehner called Ted Cruz "lucifer in the flesh," adding that he "never worked with a more miserable son of a bitch in my life." Boehner has endorsed John Kasich, but he said he'd vote for Donald Trump over Cruz. He also praised Bernie Sanders, calling him the most honest politician in the race, and predicted that Joe Biden may yet have a role to play in the Democratic contest, especially if Hillary Clinton runs into legal trouble over her emails.

Source:
×