Iran Reportedly Signals Openness to Key Uranium Curbs

Global Security Newswire Staff
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Global Security Newswire Staff
Oct. 16, 2013, 11:02 a.m.

En­voys on Wed­nes­day said Ir­a­ni­an ne­go­ti­at­ors this week voiced a tent­at­ive open­ness to di­al­ing back their na­tion’s dis­puted urani­um re­fine­ment activ­it­ies in re­turn for curbs on in­ter­na­tion­al fin­an­cial pen­al­ties, Re­u­ters re­por­ted.

Still, West­ern gov­ern­ment in­siders said it was un­clear if the Per­sian Gulf power would take steps ne­ces­sary to dis­pel fears that it is pur­su­ing a nuc­le­ar-bomb cap­ab­il­ity. Few spe­cif­ics have sur­faced pub­licly on an atom­ic com­prom­ise pro­pos­al put for­ward by Tehran at a two-day mul­ti­lat­er­al meet­ing com­pleted in Geneva on Wed­nes­day.

One West­ern en­voy said new plans are in place for a fol­low-up Nov. 7-8 meet­ing between Ir­a­ni­an dip­lo­mats and coun­ter­parts from the five per­man­ent U.N. Se­cur­ity Coun­cil mem­ber na­tions and Ger­many — the so-called “P-5+1.”

Ir­a­ni­an For­eign Min­is­ter Mo­hammad Javad Za­rif wrote on Face­book that be­fore the next round of talks in Novem­ber the six oth­er ne­go­ti­at­ing powers will have “a chance to ac­quire the ne­ces­sary read­i­ness re­gard­ing the de­tails of Ir­an’s plans and the steps that they must take,” the New York Times re­por­ted.

EU for­eign policy chief Cath­er­ine Ashton said this week’s meet­ing, held on Tues­day and Wed­nes­day, was the “most de­tailed” to date on the nuc­le­ar dis­pute, the BBC re­por­ted.

In a joint state­ment, Za­rif and Ashton said Ir­an’s pro­pos­al “is be­ing care­fully con­sidered by the [P-5+1] as an im­port­ant con­tri­bu­tion.”

Ab­bas Araq­chi, one of Za­rif’s depu­ties, said Tehran pro­posed ini­tially ac­cept­ing cer­tain urani­um-en­rich­ment re­stric­tions with­in half a year in ex­change for par­tial curbs on pun­it­ive eco­nom­ic meas­ures, the Lon­don Guard­i­an re­por­ted on Wed­nes­day. Wash­ing­ton and its al­lies doubt Tehran’s long­time as­ser­tion that it only wants to en­rich urani­um to re­l­at­ively low levels for use in power plants and re­search re­act­ors.

A second phase would en­tail a num­ber of un­dis­closed con­fid­ence-build­ing meas­ures. In a fi­nal step, Ir­an would ac­cept more ag­gress­ive in­ter­na­tion­al audit­ing to help en­sure it is not di­vert­ing nuc­le­ar ma­ter­i­al for mil­it­ary activ­it­ies, while oth­er coun­tries would lift re­main­ing pen­al­ties and al­low Ir­a­ni­an urani­um en­rich­ment to con­tin­ue with­in es­tab­lished bound­ar­ies.

Tehran has no plan to stop en­rich­ing urani­um at its Qum and Natanz sites, the Los Angeles Times on Tues­day quoted Araq­chi as say­ing in re­marks to Ir­a­ni­an state me­dia.

Tim­ing for vari­ous steps re­mains a po­ten­tial snag for ne­go­ti­at­ors, ac­cord­ing to Re­u­ters. West­ern gov­ern­ment of­fi­cials have said eco­nom­ic pen­al­ties should re­main in place un­til Tehran stops pro­du­cing 20 per­cent-en­riched urani­um, which can quickly be con­ver­ted to bomb fuel.

Brit­ish For­eign Min­is­ter Wil­li­am Hag­ue said: “We are not today in a po­s­i­tion to make any changes in those sanc­tions. Sanc­tions must con­tin­ue. Sanc­tions are im­port­ant part of bring­ing Ir­an to the ne­go­ti­at­ing table.”

However, Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion in­siders said Wash­ing­ton is will­ing to un­freeze cer­tain Ir­a­ni­an for­eign cur­rency re­serves in re­turn for con­crete steps by Tehran, Bloomberg re­por­ted on Wed­nes­day.

At the U.S. De­fense De­part­ment, of­fi­cials on Monday said they want to sell Saudi Ar­a­bia and the United Ar­ab Emir­ates $10.8 bil­lion in air-fired cruise mis­siles and oth­er weapons, Bloomberg re­por­ted. Arms in the pro­posed pack­ages are cap­able of hit­ting air de­fenses and radar sites in Ir­an and else­where, the news agency said.

What We're Following See More »
WITH LIVE BLOGGING
Trump Deposition Video Is Online
20 hours ago
STAFF PICKS

The video of Donald Trump's deposition in his case against restaurateur Jeffrey Zakarian is now live. Slate's Jim Newell and Josh Voorhees are live-blogging it while they watch.

Source:
SOUND LEVEL AFFECTED
Debate Commission Admits Issues with Trump’s Mic
21 hours ago
THE LATEST

The Commission on Presidential Debates put out a statement today that gives credence to Donald Trump's claims that he had a bad microphone on Monday night. "Regarding the first debate, there were issues regarding Donald Trump's audio that affected the sound level in the debate hall," read the statement in its entirety.

Source:
TRUMP VS. CHEFS
Trump Deposition Video to Be Released
21 hours ago
THE LATEST

"A video of Donald Trump testifying under oath about his provocative rhetoric about Mexicans and other Latinos is set to go public" as soon as today. "Trump gave the testimony in June at a law office in Washington in connection with one of two lawsuits he filed last year after prominent chefs reacted to the controversy over his remarks by pulling out of plans to open restaurants at his new D.C. hotel. D.C. Superior Court Judge Brian Holeman said in an order issued Thursday evening that fears the testimony might show up in campaign commercials were no basis to keep the public from seeing the video."

Source:
A CANDIDATE TO BE ‘PROUD’ OF
Chicago Tribune Endorses Gary Johnson
1 days ago
THE LATEST

No matter that his recall of foreign leaders leaves something to be desired, Gary Johnson is the choice of the Chicago Tribune's editorial board. The editors argue that Donald Trump couldn't do the job of president, while hitting Hillary Clinton for "her intent to greatly increase federal spending and taxation, and serious questions about honesty and trust." Which leaves them with Johnson. "Every American who casts a vote for him is standing for principles," they write, "and can be proud of that vote. Yes, proud of a candidate in 2016."

NEVER TRUMP
USA Today Weighs in on Presidential Race for First Time Ever
1 days ago
THE DETAILS

"By all means vote, just not for Donald Trump." That's the message from USA Today editors, who are making the first recommendation on a presidential race in the paper's 34-year history. It's not exactly an endorsement; they make clear that the editorial board "does not have a consensus for a Clinton endorsement." But they state flatly that Donald Trump is, by "unanimous consensus of the editorial board, unfit for the presidency."

Source:
×