In Bid to Restart Talks, N. Korea Offers to Halt Nuke Tests, but Not Rocket Launches

None

Rachel Oswald, Global Security Newswire
See more stories about...
Rachel Oswald, Global Security Newswire
Oct. 16, 2013, 11:02 a.m.

WASH­ING­TON — North Korean of­fi­cials re­cently told a U.S. del­eg­a­tion they would cease nuc­le­ar and mis­sile tests if the United States re­turns to ne­go­ti­ations, though they would not rule out fir­ing more long-range rock­ets, a former State De­part­ment of­fi­cial told Glob­al Se­cur­ity News­wire.

Joel Wit and oth­er former U.S. ad­min­is­tra­tion of­fi­cials met in late Septem­ber with North Korean Vice For­eign Min­is­ter Ri Yong Ho for so-called Track 1.5 talks. At the in­form­al Ber­lin meet­ing — one of sev­er­al Ri has had in re­cent weeks with one­time U.S. of­fi­cials in Beijing, Ber­lin and Lon­don — they heard Py­ongy­ang’s pro­pos­al for re­in­vig­or­at­ing aid-for-de­nuc­lear­iz­a­tion ne­go­ti­ations with the United States, South Korea, Ja­pan, China and Rus­sia.

“What they’ve been do­ing in these meet­ings is put­ting some more meat on the bones on what their po­s­i­tion is in terms of re­start­ing dia­logue,” said Wit, who in the 1990s led the State De­part­ment’s ef­forts to im­ple­ment the U.S.-North Korea Agreed Frame­work. “They’ve laid it out in a fairly de­tailed way and they’ve also laid out what their po­s­i­tion would be in a dia­logue.”

Py­ongy­ang has pub­licly stated it will not ac­cept any pre­con­di­tions to re­turn­ing to the six-na­tion nuc­le­ar talks. But state­ments made by its rep­res­ent­at­ives in the Track 1.5 talks sug­gest that after any form­al ne­go­ti­ations ac­tu­ally start “they’d be will­ing to take con­fid­ence-build­ing meas­ures” such as im­ple­ment­ing a morator­i­um on un­der­ground nuc­le­ar test­ing and test-launch­ing stra­tegic bal­list­ic mis­siles, Wit said in an in­ter­view. Crit­ic­ally, though, the North has not offered to ab­stain from fur­ther long-range rock­et launches.

Wit, a U.S.-Korea In­sti­tute vis­it­ing schol­ar who ed­its the ex­pert web­site 38 North, said the North Koreans know the United States wants any morator­i­um to in­clude rock­et launches. “They un­der­stand that’s a prob­lem from our per­spect­ive,” he said.

A Feb­ru­ary 2012 morator­i­um deal between Py­ongy­ang and Wash­ing­ton col­lapsed be­fore it could be im­ple­men­ted when North Korea, ig­nor­ing U.S. de­mands, launched a long-range rock­et it claimed was for peace­ful space re­search. The Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion and many oth­er gov­ern­ments con­demned the launch as a cov­er for a long-range bal­list­ic mis­sile test.

The ex­per­i­ence made Wash­ing­ton even more leery than it was be­fore of sit­ting down to talks with North Korea ab­sent pri­or demon­stra­tions of a com­mit­ment to ir­re­vers­ible de­nuc­lear­iz­a­tion.

Asked to re­spond to Py­ongy­ang’s latest morator­i­um pro­pos­al, State De­part­ment spokes­wo­man Mar­ie Harf said: “The onus is, of course, on North Korea to take mean­ing­ful steps to­wards liv­ing up to” its pre­vi­ously agreed-to de­nuc­lear­iz­a­tion prom­ises.

“I’m not go­ing to out­line spe­cific­ally what that might look like, but they com­mit­ted to abandon­ing their en­tire pro­gram and we hope that there would be some move­ment in that dir­ec­tion,” she said at an Oct. 10 press brief­ing.

Wit said Obama of­fi­cials “listened po­litely, which isn’t al­ways the case,” when they were briefed about the re­cent Track 1.5 talks with the North.

This past sum­mer, Wit told a Wash­ing­ton audi­ence if the Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion does not ne­go­ti­ate with North Korea now, it es­sen­tially is ta­citly ac­qui­es­cing to a fu­ture where the coun­try has a cred­ible nuc­le­ar weapon.

“What we should be do­ing is to be seek­ing to re­sume talks and then [the North Koreans] should of course take con­fid­ence-build­ing meas­ures earli­er on,” Wit told GSN on Oct. 10.

Evans Revere, who served as prin­cip­al deputy as­sist­ant sec­ret­ary of State for East Asi­an and Pa­cific af­fairs in the George W. Bush ad­min­is­tra­tion, said he per­ceives a “will­ing­ness” by the Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion to reen­gage with North Korea, provided it es­sen­tially re­com­mits it­self to de­nuc­lear­iz­a­tion prom­ises made in the six-na­tion frame­work in Septem­ber 2005.

“There is no an­ti­pathy to­ward en­ga­ging and dis­cuss­ing with North Korea but the con­ver­sa­tion needs to cen­ter around North Korea’s ful­fill­ment of the ob­lig­a­tions that it has already un­der­taken,” Revere told GSN in a Septem­ber in­ter­view after he re­turned from Track 1.5 talks hos­ted by the Chinese For­eign Min­istry in Beijing.

Joseph De­Trani, a North Korea ex­pert who pre­vi­ously headed the Na­tion­al Counter Pro­lif­er­a­tion Cen­ter in the Of­fice of the Dir­ect­or of Na­tion­al In­tel­li­gence, be­lieves the United States “should be real­ist­ic” and re­cog­nize it needs either to ne­go­ti­ate with Kim Jong Un’s re­gime or watch its nuc­le­ar weapons work con­tin­ue to ad­vance.

De­Trani re­portedly en­gaged in in­form­al talks in early Oc­to­ber with North Korea’s Ri in Lon­don. At an Oct. 11 con­fer­ence in Wash­ing­ton, he said the United States and oth­ers must stop be­liev­ing it is only a mat­ter of time be­fore the Kim dyn­asty im­plodes, leav­ing its nuc­le­ar weapons pro­gram to quickly be dis­mantled.

“We’ve been drink­ing the Kool-Aid for 20 years,” De­Trani said. “We need en­gage­ment” with the North Korean re­gime.

What We're Following See More »
‘PULLING A TRUMP’
GOP Budget Chiefs Won’t Invite Administration to Testify
1 days ago
THE DETAILS

The administration will release its 2017 budget blueprint tomorrow, but the House and Senate budget committees won’t be inviting anyone from the White House to come talk about it. “The chairmen of the House and Senate Budget committees released a joint statement saying it simply wasn’t worth their time” to hear from OMB Director Shaun Donovan. Accusing the members of pulling a “Donald Trump,” White House spokesman Josh Earnest said the move “raises some questions about how confident they are about the kinds of arguments that they could make.”

Source:
A DARK CLOUD OVER TRUMP?
Snowstorm Could Impact Primary Turnout
1 days ago
THE LATEST

A snowstorm is supposed to hit New Hampshire today and “linger into Primary Tuesday.” GOP consultant Ron Kaufman said lower turnout should help candidates who have spent a lot of time in the state tending to retail politicking. Donald Trump “has acknowledged that he needs to step up his ground-game, and a heavy snowfall could depress his figures relative to more organized candidates.”

Source:
IN CASE OF EMERGENCY
A Shake-Up in the Offing in the Clinton Camp?
1 days ago
THE DETAILS

Anticipating a primary loss in New Hampshire on Tuesday, Hillary and Bill Clinton “are considering staffing and strategy changes” to their campaign. Sources tell Politico that the Clintons are likely to layer over top officials with experienced talent, rather than fire their staff en masse.

Source:
THE LAST ROUND OF NEW HAMPSHIRE POLLS
Trump Is Still Ahead, but Who’s in Second?
16 hours ago
THE LATEST

We may not be talking about New Hampshire primary polls for another three-and-a-half years, so here goes:

  • American Research Group’s tracking poll has Donald Trump in the lead with 30% support, followed by Marco Rubio and John Kasich tying for second place at 16%. On the Democratic side, Bernie Sanders leads Hillary Clinton 53%-41%.
  • The 7 News/UMass Lowell tracking poll has Trump way out front with 34%, followed by Rubio and Ted Cruz with 13% apiece. Among the Democrats, Sanders is in front 56%-40%.
  • A Gravis poll puts Trump ahead with 28%, followed by Kasich with 17% and Rubio with 15%.
IT’S ALL ABOUT SECOND PLACE
CNN Calls the Primary for Sanders and Trump
3 hours ago
THE LATEST

Well that didn’t take long. CNN has already declared Bernie Sanders and Donald Trump the winners of the New Hampshire primary, leaving the rest of the candidates to fight for the scraps. Five minutes later, the Associated Press echoed CNN’s call.

Source:
×