In a normal political environment, the minority party in the House has the least clout in Congress. With no need for a supermajority to move contentious legislation or the ability to block bills from the majority, as occurs in the Senate, the lower chamber’s minority historically has had a more limited role in legislating.
But we are not in a normal political environment. These days, the minority is acting like the majority.
Obviously House Democrats can’t control the floor or bring up their bills. But during the past few major fiscal fights, a nearly united House Democratic Caucus has carried bills across the finish line, despite being outnumbered by Republicans. The last notable time this occurred was during the fiscal-cliff showdown, in which House Republican leadership was forced to put a bill up for a vote that received support from more than twice as many Democrats as Republicans. Only 16 Democrats voted against it, compared with 151 Republicans.
While the Republican conference has been divided in these big battles, House Democrats have been remarkably unified — with some members gritting their teeth and casting votes for bills they don’t like. Many Democrats attribute that to a leadership that has a proven ability to deliver votes.
“What counts is not how many Democratic votes there are, what counts is how you get it to 218, and we will get it to 218,” Rep. Steve Israel, D-N.Y., said hours before the vote on the Senate agreement to reopen the government and temporarily lift the debt ceiling.
The measure passed the House late Wednesday with 198 Democratic votes, despite a number of progressives strongly disapproving of the sequester-driven funding levels included in the deal.
“We hate them, but we hate the shutdown more,” said Rep. Keith Ellison, D-Minn., cochair of the Congressional Progressive Caucus.
“As much as we believe in what we believe in as progressives, we would never dream of shutting the government down over our priorities. That might disappoint some progressives, but the truth is it’s just wrong for the American people,” Ellison said. “I fervently want to see some real gun control, some real gun safety, but I would never try to wreck the country over it.”
Even Rep. Rosa DeLauro of Connecticut — one of just 16 Democrats who voted against the fiscal-cliff deal because the tax rates for wealthier Americans were still too low for her — said hours before the vote on the Senate agreement, “I’m going to wait to see what it has in it, but I want to keep the government open and I want to see the debt ceiling raised.”
“Our caucus has a sense of loyalty to each other and to our common purpose,” said Rep. Jim Moran, D-Va. “There is a bond of unity. Our individual differences and our geographical differences can be put aside with something this important.”
There was little grumbling among House Democrats leaving their caucus meeting Wednesday. Instead, there was a raucous applause. Not in response to “winning” a negotiation, said Rep. John Larson, D-Conn. “[Rep.] Jim Clyburn told a wonderful story about unity, growing up in South Carolina.”
What We're Following See More »
President Trump added five new names to his Supreme Court short list on Friday, should a need arise to appoint a new justice. The list now numbers 25 individuals. They are: 7th Circuit Appeals Judge Amy Coney Barrett, Georgia Supreme Court Justice Britt C. Grant, District of Columbia Circuit Appeals Court Judge Brett M. Kavanaugh, 11th Circuit Appeals Judge Kevin C. Newsom, and Oklahoma Supreme Court Justice Patrick Wyrick.
"Attorney General Jeff Sessions announced Friday the Justice Department will revamp its policy for issuing guidance documents. Speaking at the Federalist Society’s annual conference in Washington Friday, Sessions said the Justice Department will no longer issue guidance that 'purports to impose new obligations on any party outside the executive branch.' He said DOJ will review and repeal any documents that could violate this policy." Sessions said: “Too often, rather than going through the long, slow, regulatory process provided in statute, agencies make new rules through guidance documents—by simply sending a letter. This cuts off the public from the regulatory process by skipping the required public hearings and comment periods—and it is simply not what these documents are for. Guidance documents should be used to explain existing law—not to change it.”
"Christopher Steele, the former British intelligence officer who wrote the explosive dossier alleging ties between Donald Trump and Russia," says in a new book by The Guardian's Luke Harding that "Trump's land and hotel deals with Russians needed to be examined. ... Steele did not go into further detail, Harding said, but seemed to be referring to a 2008 home sale to the Russian oligarch Dmitry Rybolovlev. Richard Dearlove, who headed the UK foreign-intelligence unit MI6 between 1999 and 2004, said in April that Trump borrowed money from Russia for his business during the 2008 financial crisis."
"The British publicist who helped set up the fateful meeting between Donald Trump Jr. and a group of Russians at Trump Tower in June 2016 is ready to meet with Special Prosecutor Robert Mueller's office, according to several people familiar with the matter. Rob Goldstone has been living in Bangkok, Thailand, but has been communicating with Mueller's office through his lawyer, said a source close to Goldstone."