David Grosso’s Defiance: Council Member Emerges as a Champion for D.C. Rights

The council member is part of a new generation of leaders willing to be confrontational with Congress, even if it means breaking the law.

National Journal
Lucia Graves
Oct. 17, 2013, 6:49 a.m.

{{ BIZOBJ (video: 4511) }}

Many took note of May­or Vin­cent Gray’s out­spoken ap­proach dur­ing the shut­down, when he did things like crash a Sen­ate press­er at the Cap­it­ol to de­mand that fed­er­al law­makers take up the Dis­trict’s fund­ing bill. Coun­cil mem­ber Dav­id Grosso thinks he didn’t go far enough.

The is­sue at hand was fed­er­al con­trol of the Dis­trict’s budget. the Dis­trict of Columbia is the only jur­is­dic­tion in the United States whose budget and rev­en­ues are con­trolled by Con­gress, and as the fed­er­al shut­down dragged on, the city was run­ning out of emer­gency re­serves. “It’s a new at­ti­tude in D.C.,” Grosso told Na­tion­al Journ­al at the time. “We’re no longer go­ing to ask for per­mis­sion. We’re go­ing to stand up for our rights and spend our loc­al money.”

The shut­down is over now and with it, the fight for con­trol of the D.C. budget. But Grosso and his con­front­a­tion­al ap­proach aren’t go­ing away. He already has his eyes on the next D.C. autonomy fight: the free­dom for D.C. to pass its own le­gis­la­tion without ap­prov­al from Con­gress.

The Dis­trict is the only place in coun­try where le­gis­la­tion must be sent to Con­gress for ap­prov­al be­fore it be­comes law, a pro­cess that can take weeks. While its le­gis­la­tion is al­most al­ways ap­proved without con­flict, mem­bers of Con­gress do have the power to put D.C. laws on hold, as was the case with a bill to leg­al­ize med­ic­al marijuana, which was stalled for years after Con­gress im­posed a rider block­ing money to im­ple­ment the meas­ure.

“My ar­gu­ment would be that we should simply stop send­ing our bills up there for le­gis­lat­ive ap­prov­al,” said Grosso, an at-large coun­cil­man who rep­res­ents all eight wards in the city. “The may­or should sign them and then we should im­ple­ment them.” The polit­ics of it is a bit nu­anced, he ad­mits, since wheth­er D.C. has the leg­al au­thor­ity to do that and wheth­er their laws would have any im­pact at all without ap­prov­al from Con­gress re­main out­stand­ing ques­tions.

“That’s a little trick­i­er,” said Grosso, who stud­ied law at Geor­getown Uni­versity. “I haven’t figured out how I’m gonna do that yet. But I’m work­ing on it.”

The back­drop of course is that due to its des­ig­na­tion as a fed­er­al en­clave, D.C. has long been dis­em­powered, with no vot­ing rep­res­ent­a­tion in Con­gress. The shut­down gave Dis­trict lead­ers a rare op­por­tun­ity to broad­cast their con­stitu­ents’ dis­en­fran­chise­ment at the na­tion­al level. Some, in­clud­ing James Jones, com­mu­nic­a­tions dir­ect­or for ad­vocacy or­gan­iz­a­tion D.C. Vote, cred­it Grosso with turn­ing the shut­down in­to a show­down for the Dis­trict.

“I think Dav­id rep­res­ents a new­er gen­er­a­tion of polit­ic­al lead­ers in the Dis­trict who are go­ing to be more con­front­a­tion­al with Con­gress, and we need that,” Jones said. “In­stead of try­ing to play nice all the time, we have to be a little more ag­gress­ive, and if there’s one thing Dav­id is on is­sues he cares about, it’s ag­gress­ive.”

Grosso isn’t the first politi­cian who’s been will­ing to break the law and risk ar­rest for Dis­trict rights. In 2011 a budget deal hammered out between Pres­id­ent Obama and House Speak­er John Boehner in­cluded fund­ing for a con­tro­ver­sial vouch­er pro­gram, des­pite the city’s wishes. It also banned D.C. from spend­ing its own loc­al tax dol­lars on abor­tion ser­vices for low-in­come wo­men.

May­or Gray and sev­er­al mem­bers of the D.C. Coun­cil were ar­res­ted at a Cap­it­ol Hill protest of the ac­tion. But it was a sym­bol­ic ges­ture, meant to il­lus­trate the Dis­trict’s pre­dic­a­ment. Grosso is ad­voc­at­ing something else: dir­ect ac­tion.

“It’s ac­tu­ally the most dir­ect form of civil dis­obedi­ence,” Grosso told Na­tion­al Journ­al at an event hos­ted by D.C. Vote last week. “In­dir­ect is when you block the streets and say we want our rights. Dir­ect is when you ac­tu­ally do something that moves for­ward the is­sue that you care about.”

Grosso was elec­ted to the coun­cil in Novem­ber 2012, after serving as an aide for D.C. coun­cil mem­ber Shar­on Am­brose and later, as a le­gis­lat­ive dir­ect­or for the Dis­trict’s con­gres­sion­al del­eg­ate, Elean­or Holmes Norton. “The coun­cil is for­tu­nate to have Dav­id back, this time in its of­fi­cial lead­er­ship,” Norton said in a state­ment to Na­tion­al Journ­al. “After hav­ing served as a staff lead­er in the coun­cil so well that I asked him to be­come my con­gres­sion­al le­gis­lat­ive dir­ect­or. I am not sur­prised that early on in his ten­ure, Dav­id has be­come an in­flu­en­tial and in­nov­at­ive thinker on the coun­cil.”

Norton praised, among oth­er things, Grosso’s “cool idea to re­name our foot­ball team the Wash­ing­ton Red­tails” and sought to dis­pel any ru­mors that she is try­ing to “in­filt­rate the coun­cil” with her former staff mem­bers, two of whom now serve on the coun­cil. (The oth­er is Kenyan Mc­Duf­fie.)

“I do not en­dorse races in D.C.,” Norton said, “but I must say that I ap­pre­ci­ate how both Dav­id and Kenyan have fo­cused on get­ting money out of polit­ics, a con­cern of mine in the Con­gress.”

Oth­er Dis­trict ad­voc­ates offered more cau­tious praise. D.C. Apple­seed’s Wal­ter Smith said he sup­ports Grosso’s new ap­proach “to the ex­tent it cap­tures a new zeal­ous­ness and as­sert­ive­ness and a will­ing­ness to take strong stands and push the en­vel­ope.”

“Where I won­der about it,” he ad­ded, “is wheth­er in the long run we can suc­cess­fully vi­ol­ate fed­er­al law and make it stick, wheth­er it’s the right strategy if we in fact have leg­al ar­gu­ments in sup­port of what we’re do­ing.”

What We're Following See More »
Trade Bill Would Ban Imports Made with Slave Labor
28 minutes ago

“A bill headed for President Barack Obama this week includes a provision that would ban U.S. imports of fish caught by slaves in Southeast Asia, gold mined by children in Africa and garments sewn by abused women in Bangladesh, closing a loophole in an 85-year-old tariff law.” The Senate approved the bill, which would also ban Internet taxes and overhaul trade laws, by a vote of 75-20. It now goes to President Obama.

Sanders Closes to Within Seven Nationally in New Poll
41 minutes ago

Bernie Sanders has closed to within seven points of Hillary Clinton in a new Morning Consult survey. Clinton leads 46%-39%. Consistent with the New Hampshire voting results, Clinton does best with retirees, while Sanders leads by 20 percentage points among those under 30. On the Republican side, Donald Trump is far ahead with 44% support. Trailing by a huge margin are Ted Cruz (17%), Ben Carson (10%) and Marco Rubio (10%).

Sanders and Clinton Spar Over … President Obama
12 hours ago

President Obama became a surprise topic of contention toward the end of the Democratic debate, as Hillary Clinton reminded viewers that Sanders had challenged the progressive bona fides of President Obama in 2011 and suggested that someone might challenge him from the left. “The kind of criticism that we’ve heard from Senator Sanders about our president I expect from Republicans, I do not expect from someone running for the Democratic nomination to succeed President Obama,” she said. “Madame Secretary, that is a low blow,” replied Sanders, before getting in another dig during his closing statement: “One of us ran against Barack Obama. I was not that candidate.”

THE 1%
Sanders’s Appeals to Minorities Still Filtered Through Wall Street Talk
13 hours ago

It’s all about the 1% and Wall Street versus everyone else for Bernie Sanders—even when he’s talking about race relations. Like Hillary Clinton, he needs to appeal to African-American and Hispanic voters in coming states, but he insists on doing so through his lens of class warfare. When he got a question from the moderators about the plight of black America, he noted that during the great recession, African Americans “lost half their wealth,” and “instead of tax breaks for billionaires,” a Sanders presidency would deliver jobs for kids. On the very next question, he downplayed the role of race in inequality, saying, “It’s a racial issue, but it’s also a general economic issue.”

Clinton Already Pivoting Her Messaging
14 hours ago

It’s been said in just about every news story since New Hampshire: the primaries are headed to states where Hillary Clinton will do well among minority voters. Leaving nothing to chance, she underscored that point in her opening statement in the Milwaukee debate tonight, saying more needs to be done to help “African Americans who face discrimination in the job market” and immigrant families. She also made an explicit reference to “equal pay for women’s work.” Those boxes she’s checking are no coincidence: if she wins women, blacks and Hispanics, she wins the nomination.