Amid Oil Boom, Petroleum Exports Surge

An empty tanker sits at the pier of Chevron's refinery in Richmond, Calif., which refines roughly 250,000 barrels of oil a day into products like gasoline, diesel and jet fuel.
National Journal
Amy Harder
Oct. 17, 2013, 4:35 p.m.

RICH­MOND, Cal­if. — It takes about a month for oil to ar­rive from the Middle East to a re­finery here on the edge of the San Fran­cisco Bay. On a clear day, you can see the Golden Gate Bridge in the dis­tance from the re­finery’s pier, but you will prob­ably no­tice first and fore­most the massive tankers docked and un­load­ing oil in­to a web of pipes.

About 60 per­cent of the oil pro­cessed by this re­finery, owned and op­er­ated by Chev­ron, comes from the Middle East. Most of the rest comes from Alaska, also by tanker. But the oil com­ing in is not as in­ter­est­ing as what is go­ing out. Many com­pan­ies are be­gin­ning to turn around and ex­port the re­fined gas­ol­ine, dies­el, and jet fuel.

“As the eco­nomy has taken a hit, as vehicle ef­fi­ciency stand­ards have lowered the de­mand for fuel, Cali­for­nia re­finer­ies in ag­greg­ate can now pro­duce more than the loc­al de­mand and there­fore products are be­gin­ning to be ex­por­ted,” said Dave Reeves, pres­id­ent of glob­al sup­ply and trad­ing at Chev­ron.

The boom in oil and nat­ur­al-gas pro­duc­tion in many parts of the coun­try has helped po­s­i­tion the United States as a net ex­port­er of en­ergy, and Cali­for­nia is in­creas­ingly part of that trend.

From a sheer num­bers per­spect­ive, Amer­ica’s in­creased re­fined-pet­ro­leum ex­ports are not­able. The United States ex­por­ted 3 mil­lion bar­rels of re­fined pet­ro­leum products a day in Ju­ly, an al­most 150 per­cent in­crease over the past six years. In 2012, these ex­ports were worth $117 bil­lion and were the single-largest U.S. ex­port, ac­cord­ing to data re­leased by the Com­merce De­part­ment earli­er this year. Only the auto in­dustry — whose totals also in­clude re­lated man­u­fac­tur­ing sec­tors — was tal­lied high­er, at $146 bil­lion.

Re­fined-pet­ro­leum ex­ports out of the West Coast, which largely means Cali­for­nia and Alaska, have in­creased by 126 per­cent in the last six years to reach 465,000 bar­rels a day in Ju­ly 2013, the highest amount since at least 1981, ac­cord­ing to data from the fed­er­al En­ergy In­form­a­tion Ad­min­is­tra­tion. The ex­port trend on the West Coast is fol­low­ing in the foot­steps of the Gulf Coast, which over the same time peri­od saw a 187 per­cent in­crease to reach al­most 2.2 mil­lion bar­rels a day of ex­ports in Ju­ly.

The factors driv­ing these ex­ports and the im­pact on prices at the pump in Cali­for­nia and around the coun­try are more con­vo­luted than it may ini­tially seem, es­pe­cially to politi­cians wor­ried about how the even per­cep­tion of high­er gas­ol­ine prices could af­fect cam­paigns.

The main factor that de­term­ines wheth­er com­pan­ies will ex­port their re­fined pet­ro­leum products is eco­nom­ic: how much it costs to run a re­finery, which in turn is driv­en by the price dif­fer­ence between crude oil and re­fined products, a concept the en­ergy ex­perts call the “crack spread.”

“The only thing that mat­ters is the spread between crude oil and re­fined products,” said Amy My­ers Jaffe, ex­ec­ut­ive dir­ect­or of en­ergy and sus­tain­ab­il­ity at the Uni­versity of Cali­for­nia (Dav­is).

Ex­ec­ut­ives with­in the oil and re­fin­ing in­dustry are be­gin­ning to blame tough­er en­vir­on­ment­al reg­u­la­tions for why they’re in­creas­ing ex­ports, in­clud­ing Cali­for­nia’s low-car­bon fuel stand­ard (LCFS) and the na­tion­al re­new­able-fuel stand­ard (RFS), which both man­date the trans­port­a­tion sec­tor to run on lower-car­bon fuels, al­beit in dif­fer­ent ways. Chev­ron and oth­er com­pan­ies op­er­at­ing here in Cali­for­nia, which has the third-highest re­fin­ing ca­pa­city in the coun­try ac­cord­ing to 2011 EIA data, must con­tend with both sets of reg­u­la­tions.

“To the de­gree that we’re un­able for whatever reas­on, wheth­er it’s the RFS na­tion­ally or the LCFS with­in the state of Cali­for­nia, when you get to that point where you can’t meet de­mand, your real al­tern­ate choice is to look for ex­port,” Reeves said. “Dir­ec­tion­ally, it should in­cent more ex­ports. And then dir­ec­tion­ally, if you ex­port more there is less sup­ply do­mest­ic­ally, which will have a price im­pact do­mest­ic­ally.”

Right now, Reeves says Chev­ron ex­ports a min­im­al amount of re­fined pet­ro­leum products out of its two Cali­for­nia re­finer­ies, but has in­creased ex­ports out of its fa­cil­ity at the Gulf Coast. Texas-based Valero says it doesn’t ex­port at all from its two Cali­for­nia re­finer­ies but that it wants to.

“We would like to be able to ex­port more to the Pa­cific Coast of Mex­ico or fur­ther down to South Amer­ica,” Valero spokes­man Bill Day said. Cit­ing in­fra­struc­ture con­cerns and oth­er costs with­in the state, Day ad­ded: “At this point, we haven’t been able to do that from Cali­for­nia.”

Valero, like Chev­ron, says lower-car­bon fuel policies will drive its products out­side of U.S. bor­ders. U.C. Dav­is’s Jaffe says oil com­pan­ies are us­ing these reg­u­la­tions as a scape­goat.

“When these com­pan­ies are go­ing to tell you the reas­on they’re hav­ing to sell to Lat­in Amer­ica is be­cause of the en­vir­on­ment­al re­stric­tions here are too hard to com­ply, that is a di­ver­sion be­cause they were ex­port­ing from Cali­for­nia be­fore the LCFS kicked in,” Jaffe said.

Wheth­er in­creased ex­ports would cre­ate high­er fuel costs for Amer­ic­ans de­pends on how much oil re­finer­ies kept stored on site, said Jaffe, who has been work­ing on these is­sues for 30 years.

“We have a sur­plus of re­fin­ing ca­pa­city versus de­mand so ex­ports don’t ne­ces­sar­ily mean high­er gas­ol­ine prices,” she said. She ref­er­enced the Au­gust 2012 fire that erup­ted at Chev­ron’s re­finery here in Rich­mond as fur­ther evid­ence that the con­nec­tion among ex­ports, prices, and en­vir­on­ment­al reg­u­la­tions is not so clear-cut.

“When Chev­ron had the ac­ci­dent at Rich­mond and there was a worry about a short­age of gas­ol­ine, they were still ex­port­ing gas­ol­ine at that time,” Jaffe said. “In­vent­or­ies were low and the com­pan­ies were hav­ing trouble meet­ing de­mand, and so ex­ports made the situ­ation worse and were prob­ably a con­trib­ut­ing factor to the high prices seen at the time.”

Chev­ron and Texas-based Te­soro, an­oth­er ma­jor Cali­for­nia re­finer, did not dis­close spe­cif­ic ex­port data on their re­finer­ies. Re­gard­less of the cause, this ex­port trend isn’t poised to slow any time soon. In fact, some in the oil in­dustry are look­ing to by­pass the re­finers al­to­geth­er and ex­port crude oil, which has been banned for al­most 40 years.

Back in Wash­ing­ton, Har­old Hamm, CEO of Con­tin­ent­al Re­sources, the in­de­pend­ent com­pany with the biggest foot­print in North Dakota’s vast oil fields, said he’s go­ing to fight to re­peal that ban.

“It’s an ar­cha­ic rule that should be done away with,” Hamm said. “Ten years from now, I hope we’re wrangling with Con­gress over it. We need ex­ports.”

He poin­ted out that re­finer­ies are ex­port­ing at re­cord rates, so com­pan­ies like his should have the same right. As he put it, “I don’t think any of the do­mest­ic pro­du­cers are go­ing to be their milk cows.”

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
When It Comes to Mining Asteroids, Technology Is Only the First Problem
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Foreign Policy takes a look at the future of mining the estimated "100,000 near-Earth objects—including asteroids and comets—in the neighborhood of our planet. Some of these NEOs, as they’re called, are small. Others are substantial and potentially packed full of water and various important minerals, such as nickel, cobalt, and iron. One day, advocates believe, those objects will be tapped by variations on the equipment used in the coal mines of Kentucky or in the diamond mines of Africa. And for immense gain: According to industry experts, the contents of a single asteroid could be worth trillions of dollars." But the technology to get us there is only the first step. Experts say "a multinational body might emerge" to manage rights to NEOs, as well as a body of law, including an international court.

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Obama Reflects on His Economic Record
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Not to be outdone by Jeffrey Goldberg's recent piece in The Atlantic about President Obama's foreign policy, the New York Times Magazine checks in with a longread on the president's economic legacy. In it, Obama is cognizant that the economic reality--73 straight months of growth--isn't matched by public perceptions. Some of that, he says, is due to a constant drumbeat from the right that "that denies any progress." But he also accepts some blame himself. “I mean, the truth of the matter is that if we had been able to more effectively communicate all the steps we had taken to the swing voter,” he said, “then we might have maintained a majority in the House or the Senate.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Reagan Families, Allies Lash Out at Will Ferrell
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Ronald Reagan's children and political allies took to the media and Twitter this week to chide funnyman Will Ferrell for his plans to play a dementia-addled Reagan in his second term in a new comedy entitled Reagan. In an open letter, Reagan's daughter Patti Davis tells Ferrell, who's also a producer on the movie, “Perhaps for your comedy you would like to visit some dementia facilities. I have—I didn’t find anything comedic there, and my hope would be that if you’re a decent human being, you wouldn’t either.” Michael Reagan, the president's son, tweeted, "What an Outrag....Alzheimers is not joke...It kills..You should be ashamed all of you." And former Rep. Joe Walsh called it an example of "Hollywood taking a shot at conservatives again."

Source:
PEAK CONFIDENCE
Clinton No Longer Running Primary Ads
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

In a sign that she’s ready to put a longer-than-ex­pec­ted primary battle be­hind her, former Sec­ret­ary of State Hil­lary Clin­ton (D) is no longer go­ing on the air in up­com­ing primary states. “Team Clin­ton hasn’t spent a single cent in … Cali­for­nia, In­di­ana, Ken­tucky, Ore­gon and West Vir­gin­ia, while” Sen. Bernie Sanders’ (I-VT) “cam­paign has spent a little more than $1 mil­lion in those same states.” Meanwhile, Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR), Sanders’ "lone back­er in the Sen­ate, said the can­did­ate should end his pres­id­en­tial cam­paign if he’s los­ing to Hil­lary Clin­ton after the primary sea­son con­cludes in June, break­ing sharply with the can­did­ate who is vow­ing to take his in­sur­gent bid to the party con­ven­tion in Phil­adelphia.”

Source:
CITIZENS UNITED PT. 2?
Movie Based on ‘Clinton Cash’ to Debut at Cannes
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

The team behind the bestselling "Clinton Cash"—author Peter Schweizer and Breitbart's Stephen Bannon—is turning the book into a movie that will have its U.S. premiere just before the Democratic National Convention this summer. The film will get its global debut "next month in Cannes, France, during the Cannes Film Festival. (The movie is not a part of the festival, but will be shown at a screening arranged for distributors)." Bloomberg has a trailer up, pointing out that it's "less Ken Burns than Jerry Bruckheimer, featuring blood-drenched money, radical madrassas, and ominous footage of the Clintons."

Source:
×