GOP to California Governor: Don’t Spoil Fracking Potential

Kevin McCarthy speaks at the National Republican Congressional Committee (NRCC) election watch party at the Washington Hyatt on Tuesday, November 2, 2010.
©2010 Richard A. Bloom
Amy Harder
Oct. 17, 2013, 1:51 p.m.

House Re­pub­lic­ans hail­ing from Cali­for­nia, led by Ma­jor­ity Whip Kev­in Mc­Carthy, are send­ing a pree­mpt­ive warn­ing to Demo­crat­ic Gov. Jerry Brown to en­sure that a law he signed last month doesn’t get in the way of the Golden State’s po­ten­tial to re­vive its oil in­dustry.

The new state law sets the wheels in mo­tion for Brown’s ad­min­is­tra­tion to reg­u­late ad­vanced drilling tech­no­lo­gies, in­clud­ing hy­draul­ic frac­tur­ing, which has been key to de­vel­op­ing oil and nat­ur­al-gas re­sources trapped in deep rock form­a­tions — but is con­tro­ver­sial for its en­vir­on­ment­al risks, in­clud­ing wa­ter con­tam­in­a­tion.

“Any hy­draul­ic frac­tur­ing reg­u­la­tions must not end up be­ing a solu­tion in search of a prob­lem,” Mc­Carthy and more than a dozen oth­er Cali­for­nia Re­pub­lic­ans, in­clud­ing House Over­sight and Gov­ern­ment Re­form Chair­man Dar­rell Issa, wrote in a let­ter to Brown dated Thursday.

Cali­for­nia has long been a top oil-pro­du­cing state — par­tic­u­larly in Mc­Carthy’s dis­trict around Bakersfield — but its pro­duc­tion has de­clined over the last few dec­ades. The GOP law­makers say in their let­ter that with the oil re­sources of the Monterey Shale form­a­tion, which spans much of the San Joa­quin Val­ley, “Cali­for­nia is lit­er­ally sit­ting on top of a sea of Black Gold that could put our en­ergy sup­ply and eco­nom­ic prosper­ity in our own hands, not the hands of for­eign na­tions.”

They point to a 2011 re­port by the fed­er­al En­ergy In­form­a­tion Ad­min­is­tra­tion that found the Monterey form­a­tion to be the largest shale-oil form­a­tion in the United States. It’s es­tim­ated to hold 15.4 bil­lion bar­rels of oil, or 65 per­cent of the total shale oil re­sources in the United States. That’s al­most four times as much as what EIA es­tim­ates is un­der­ground in West­ern North Dakota, where oil pro­duc­tion over the last sev­er­al years has cata­pul­ted the state to second place be­hind Texas in pet­ro­leum out­put.

“It is ab­so­lutely im­per­at­ive that the new per­mit­ting pro­gram take in­to ac­count the real­it­ies of how the oil and nat­ur­al gas in­dustry con­ducts their budget­ing and plan­ning ef­forts, schedul­ing of drilling rigs, and oth­er routine daily activ­it­ies,” the Re­pub­lic­ans wrote. “Un­less the newly cre­ated pro­gram re­flects these real­it­ies, we are con­cerned that en­ergy pro­duc­tion in our state will be severely cur­tailed.”

Mark Necho­dom, who as the state’s De­part­ment of Con­ser­va­tion dir­ect­or is Brown’s top oil and nat­ur­al-gas reg­u­lat­or, told Na­tion­al Journ­al in an in­ter­view last week that frack­ing has been used act­ively in Cali­for­nia for 40 years. “And in Cali­for­nia there has not been one re­cord of re­por­ted dam­age dir­ectly to the use of hy­draul­ic frac­tur­ing,” Necho­dom said.

Still, en­vir­on­ment­al­ists and res­id­ents around the state are con­cerned about the en­vir­on­ment­al risks as­so­ci­ated with frack­ing, in­clud­ing wa­ter con­tam­in­a­tion, and the po­ten­tial for com­pan­ies to em­ploy the tech­no­logy more to ac­cess pre­vi­ously un­tapped re­serves. Since frack­ing has not been of­fi­cially reg­u­lated, Necho­dom con­cedes his de­part­ment doesn’t have an ac­cur­ate pic­ture of how pre­val­ent frack­ing is throughout the state.

Necho­dom ref­er­enced the na­tion­al de­bate over frack­ing, centered in places like Pennsylvania and Col­or­ado, as a ma­jor reas­on why his de­part­ment is tak­ing a closer look.

“Giv­en the great na­tion­wide wave of con­cern, we at the De­part­ment of Con­ser­va­tion are treat­ing this as an op­por­tun­ity to again em­brace pub­lic de­mand for know­ledge and trans­par­ency,” Necho­dom said. “This is an op­por­tun­ity for people to learn where their oil comes from, just the same way we want to teach people where their milk and wa­ter come from.”

What We're Following See More »
More People Watched Trump’s Acceptance Speech
18 hours ago

Hillary Clinton hopes that television ratings for the candidates' acceptance speeches at their respective conventions aren't foreshadowing of similar results at the polls in November. Preliminary results from the networks and cable channels show that 34.9 million people tuned in for Donald Trump's acceptance speech while 33.3 million watched Clinton accept the Democratic nomination. However, it is still possible that the numbers are closer than these ratings suggest: the numbers don't include ratings from PBS or CSPAN, which tend to attract more Democratic viewers.