House Republicans hailing from California, led by Majority Whip Kevin McCarthy, are sending a preemptive warning to Democratic Gov. Jerry Brown to ensure that a law he signed last month doesn’t get in the way of the Golden State’s potential to revive its oil industry.
The new state law sets the wheels in motion for Brown’s administration to regulate advanced drilling technologies, including hydraulic fracturing, which has been key to developing oil and natural-gas resources trapped in deep rock formations — but is controversial for its environmental risks, including water contamination.
“Any hydraulic fracturing regulations must not end up being a solution in search of a problem,” McCarthy and more than a dozen other California Republicans, including House Oversight and Government Reform Chairman Darrell Issa, wrote in a letter to Brown dated Thursday.
California has long been a top oil-producing state — particularly in McCarthy’s district around Bakersfield — but its production has declined over the last few decades. The GOP lawmakers say in their letter that with the oil resources of the Monterey Shale formation, which spans much of the San Joaquin Valley, “California is literally sitting on top of a sea of Black Gold that could put our energy supply and economic prosperity in our own hands, not the hands of foreign nations.”
They point to a 2011 report by the federal Energy Information Administration that found the Monterey formation to be the largest shale-oil formation in the United States. It’s estimated to hold 15.4 billion barrels of oil, or 65 percent of the total shale oil resources in the United States. That’s almost four times as much as what EIA estimates is underground in Western North Dakota, where oil production over the last several years has catapulted the state to second place behind Texas in petroleum output.
“It is absolutely imperative that the new permitting program take into account the realities of how the oil and natural gas industry conducts their budgeting and planning efforts, scheduling of drilling rigs, and other routine daily activities,” the Republicans wrote. “Unless the newly created program reflects these realities, we are concerned that energy production in our state will be severely curtailed.”
Mark Nechodom, who as the state’s Department of Conservation director is Brown’s top oil and natural-gas regulator, told National Journal in an interview last week that fracking has been used actively in California for 40 years. “And in California there has not been one record of reported damage directly to the use of hydraulic fracturing,” Nechodom said.
Still, environmentalists and residents around the state are concerned about the environmental risks associated with fracking, including water contamination, and the potential for companies to employ the technology more to access previously untapped reserves. Since fracking has not been officially regulated, Nechodom concedes his department doesn’t have an accurate picture of how prevalent fracking is throughout the state.
Nechodom referenced the national debate over fracking, centered in places like Pennsylvania and Colorado, as a major reason why his department is taking a closer look.
“Given the great nationwide wave of concern, we at the Department of Conservation are treating this as an opportunity to again embrace public demand for knowledge and transparency,” Nechodom said. “This is an opportunity for people to learn where their oil comes from, just the same way we want to teach people where their milk and water come from.”
What We're Following See More »
"Even if House Republicans manage to get enough members of their party on board with the latest version of their health care bill, they will face another battle in the Senate: whether the bill complies with the chamber’s arcane ... Byrd rule, which stipulates all provisions in a reconciliation bill must affect federal spending and revenues in a way that is not merely incidental." Democrats should have the advantage in that fight, "unless the Senate pulls another 'nuclear option.'”
The House has passed a one-week spending bill that will avert a government shutdown which was set to begin at midnight. Lawmakers now have an extra week to come to a longer agreement which is expected to fund the government through the end of the fiscal year in September. The legislation now goes to the Senate, where it is expected to pass before President Trump signs it.
President Trump’s portrayal of an effort to funnel more Medicaid dollars to Puerto Rico as a "bailout" is complicating negotiations over a continuing resolution on the budget. "House Democrats are now requiring such assistance as a condition for supporting the continuing resolution," a position that the GOP leadership is amenable to. "But Mr. Trump’s apparent skepticism aligns him with conservative House Republicans inclined to view its request as a bailout, leaving the deal a narrow path to passage in Congress."
Democrats in the House are threatening to shut down the government if Republicans expedite a vote on a bill to repeal and replace Obamacare, said Democratic House Whip Steny Hoyer Thursday. Lawmakers have introduced a one-week spending bill to give themselves an extra week to reach a long-term funding deal, which seemed poised to pass easily. However, the White House is pressuring House Republicans to take a vote on their Obamacare replacement Friday to give Trump a legislative victory, though it is still not clear that they have the necessary votes to pass the health care bill. This could go down to the wire.