Japan on Monday threw its support behind a U.N. First Committee statement that discourages the use anywhere of nuclear weapons but stops short of calling for their ban, Kyodo News reported.
Japan’s support of the statement is significant because Tokyo three times previously has refused to sign-on to similar committee statements out of concern they conflicted with a national defense policy that relies in part on the U.S. nuclear umbrella.
“It is in the interest of the very survival of humanity that nuclear weapons are never used again, under any circumstances,” reads the statement by the First Committee, which focuses on security and disarmament matters.
The statement was brought forward by New Zealand and gained the support of an unprecedented 125 nations, approximately 66 percent of the U.N. general membership.
Japan is the only nation to ever come under a nuclear attack. The experience of the 1945 bombings of the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki has turned Japan into one of the world’s biggest proponents of universal denuclearization, yet it wants this goal to happen in a gradual manner. The United States for decades has provided extended deterrence to Japan, which is concerned about the nuclear-weapons programs of its neighbors — China and North Korea.
New Zealand Ambassador for Disarmament Dell Higgie said “some changes” had been made to the language of the statement “at Japan’s request, which has facilitated their involvement.”
The 2013 statement does not discuss “outlawing” nuclear arms as a 2012 statement did. This year’s statement notes various “approaches and efforts toward nuclear [disarmament]” — language that allowed governments such as Tokyo to support it as it allows for the phased elimination of nuclear weapons.
Norway and Denmark, which as members of NATO receive nuclear deterrence protection, also supported the statement. It was not backed by any of the world’s nuclear powers.
A separate effort is taking place in the First Committee to gain support for a Japanese resolution that for the 20th year calls for the worldwide elimination of nuclear weapons.
What We're Following See More »
Rep. Dave Young can't even refuse his own paycheck. The Iowa Republican is trying to make a point that if Congress can't pass a budget (it's already missed the April 15 deadline) then it shouldn't be paid. But, he's been informed, the 27th Amendment prohibits him from refusing his own pay. "Young’s efforts to dock his own pay, however, are duck soup compared to his larger goal: docking the pay of every lawmaker when Congress drops the budget ball." His bill to stiff his colleagues has only mustered the support of three of them. Another bill, sponsored by Rep. Jim Cooper (D-TN), has about three dozen co-sponsors.
Sixty miles away, in Sandusky, Ohio. "We're pretty bitter about that," said Harmeet Dhillon, vice chairwoman of the California Republican Party. "It sucks to be California, we're like the ugly stepchild. They need us for our cash and our donors, they don't need us for anything else."
Anyone looking forward to seeing some boldfaced names on the client list of the late Deborah Jeane Palfrey, the "DC Madam," will have to wait a little longer. "The Supreme Court announced Monday it would not intervene to allow" the release of her phone records, "despite one of her former attorneys claiming the records are “very relevant” to the presidential election. Though he has repeatedly threatened to release the records if courts do not modify a 2007 restraining order, Montgomery Blair Sibley tells U.S. News he’s not quite sure what he now will do."
Hillary Clinton may have the Democratic nomination sewn up, but Bernie Sanders apparently isn't buying it. Buoyed by a poll showing them in a "virtual tie," Sanders is "holding three rallies on the final day before the state primary and hoping to pull off a win after a tough week of election losses and campaign layoffs."
As unbound delegates pledged to Ted Cruz watch him "struggle to tread water in a primary increasingly dominated by Trump, many of them, wary of a bitter convention battle that could rend the party at its seams, are rethinking their commitment to the Texas senator."