Obamacare Site Flaws Due to More Than “˜Talent Gap’


This picture taken in London on May 9, 2013 is a posed image of a laptop computer's keyboard shattering into pieces after an impact.
National Journal
Dustin Volz
Oct. 22, 2013, 6:01 p.m.

As Con­gress be­gins in­vest­ig­at­ing the rocky rol­lout of Health­Care.gov, tech­no­logy ex­perts warn that it may not find any easy scape­goats.

The site, they say, was a uniquely Her­culean un­der­tak­ing, fraught with leg­acy tech­no­logy, and that gov­ern­ment tech­no­logy products are routinely straight­jack­eted by fed­er­al bur­eau­cracy and reg­u­la­tions.

“Even if you put “¦ the best Apple team on this, they’re work­ing with a dif­fer­ent set of rules and re­stric­tions that would not al­low them to do what they can do in the private sec­tor,” said Emily Lam, seni­or dir­ect­or of health care and fed­er­al is­sues at the Sil­ic­on Val­ley Lead­er­ship Group. “It doesn’t mat­ter how bright your IT per­son is, es­pe­cially if they’re build­ing one piece or one com­pon­ent” of a very com­plex sys­tem.

With some con­gres­sion­al com­mit­tees hold­ing hear­ings and oth­ers con­duct­ing in­vest­ig­a­tions, the Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion has prom­ised quick re­pairs. The Health and Hu­man Ser­vices De­part­ment has pledged, in a blog post, to gath­er “some of the best and bright­est from both in­side and out­side gov­ern­ment” to solve the tech­nic­al prob­lems. Pres­id­ent Obama him­self spoke of a “tech surge.”

But some tech­no­lo­gists say the solu­tion may not be as simple as bring­ing in bet­ter tal­ent and let­ting them get to work. Gov­ern­ment has a long his­tory of flubs when it comes to in­form­a­tion tech­no­logy, hampered by its own ex­tens­ive list of rules and reg­u­la­tions that lim­it its abil­ity to openly and col­lab­or­at­ively en­gin­eer top-shelf di­git­al products.

“Many of the web­sites that go out from the gov­ern­ment are sub­par, and we don’t com­plain about them be­cause they’re not polit­ic­al foot­ball,” said Paul Ford, a tech­no­lo­gist and pro­gram­mer who has writ­ten about the botched rol­lout for Bloomberg Busi­nes­s­week. “It would be very hard to ship a good web­site un­der any cir­cum­stances they faced.”

Ford faults the gov­ern­ment’s de­cision to not make the back end of the web­site — the glitch-prone tech­nic­al por­tion deal­ing with things like pa­tient re­gis­tra­tion and cov­er­age plans — an open-source pro­ject that would have al­lowed out­side pro­gram­mers to col­lab­or­at­ively re­view and im­prove these things. That part of the cod­ing was primar­ily con­trac­ted out to CGI Fed­er­al, and the group has been un­will­ing to share its code.

Be­cause of pri­vacy and se­cur­ity con­cerns, gov­ern­ment be­lieves it is un­able to be fully trans­par­ent with its in­form­a­tion tech­no­logy — even though the front end of the web­site, its in­ter­face, was shared openly and coded by the D.C.-based start-up De­vel­op­ment Seed. Thou­sands of pages of reg­u­la­tions make it dif­fi­cult for gov­ern­ment to work for busi­ness, and fears of breaches in an era of high-level leaks and hack­ing activ­ity con­trib­ute to the reti­cence to change.

But the re­jec­tion of an open-source ap­proach on the back end of Health­Care.gov, ex­perts say, has con­trib­uted to the site’s prob­lems.

HHS said in its blog post that it is now “put­ting in place tools and pro­cesses to ag­gress­ively mon­it­or and identi­fy parts of Health­Care.gov where in­di­vidu­als are en­coun­ter­ing er­rors or hav­ing dif­fi­culty us­ing the site, so we can pri­or­it­ize and fix them.”

What ex­actly HHS is plan­ning is un­clear. But while a trans­par­ent, open-source de­vel­op­ment pro­cess would have likely lessened some of the site’s fail­ures, cred­it­ing all of the chal­lenges to that re­stric­tion be­lies a more nu­anced real­ity: cre­at­ing these web­sites is a his­tor­ic­ally com­plex task.

Few dis­pute that the people work­ing in Sil­ic­on Val­ley are tal­en­ted. But the in­vent­ive cre­ations they build are not hampered by the red-tape bur­eau­cracy of the fed­er­al gov­ern­ment or shackled by dec­ades of ana­log-era data that need to be in­cor­por­ated with new pro­jects.

“I don’t share Sil­ic­on Val­ley’s high as­sess­ment of it­self,” Ford said. “They rarely have to deal with huge, aw­ful leg­acy sys­tems left over from a broken past.

“In­s­tagram didn’t have to in­teg­rate with Blue Cross Blue Shield.”

Yet there is some truth to the no­tion that there is a “tal­ent gap” in IT between the gov­ern­ment and the private sec­tor, said Alex Howard, a fel­low at the Columbia Journ­al­ism School who writes about the in­ter­sec­tion of gov­ern­ment and tech­no­logy. The is­sue is not one of per­son­nel but of out­put due to the lim­it­a­tions of gov­ern­ment­al pro­cess.

In the past few dec­ades, gov­ern­ment’s re­li­ance on power­ful con­tract­ors has frag­men­ted its IT pro­cess, Howard said, which has pro­duced a “bar­ri­er to entry for the most cut­ting-edge tech­no­logy firms” that are of­ten small start-up out­fits lack­ing the in-house cap­ab­il­it­ies to pur­sue large gov­ern­ment con­tracts in Wash­ing­ton. And that dy­nam­ic, re­gard­less of the com­plex­ity of the job, is cause for con­cern.

“You’ve got either in­com­pet­ence or neg­li­gence, and the only way the pres­id­ent would let this go [is] if someone told him it was OK,” Howard said. “And that is be­cause someone was ly­ing or didn’t know.”

{{ BIZOBJ (video: 4520) }}

What We're Following See More »
Clapper: ISIS Will Try to Attack U.S. This Year
1 days ago

“Leaders of the Islamic State are determined to strike targets in the United States this year,” Director of National Intelligence James Clapper told a congressional panel today. Clapper added that “al-Qaida, from which the Islamic State spun off, remains an enemy and the U.S. will continue to see cyber threats from China, Russia and North Korea, which also is ramping up its nuclear program.”

CBC PAC to Endorse Clinton This Morning
1 hours ago

The Congressional Black Caucus PAC will formally endorse Hillary Clinton this morning, and “nearly a dozen CBC colleagues will descend on” South Carolina next week in advance of that state’s important primary. Rep. Jim Clyburn (D-SC), the highest ranking black member of Congress, reversed his earlier position of neutrality, saying he’ll make a decision “later in the week.”