Dave Camp Campaigns for Tax Reform — and His Legacy

Dave Camp speaks at a press conference to talk about extending the payroll tax cut for working Americans on Thursday, Dec. 22, 2011.
National Journal
Stacy Kaper
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Stacy Kaper
Oct. 23, 2013, 4:50 p.m.

As polit­ic­al war brought Wash­ing­ton to a stand­still earli­er this month, shut­ter­ing the fed­er­al gov­ern­ment and threat­en­ing mar­ket may­hem, Ways and Means Com­mit­tee Chair­man Dave Camp stuck to his plan.

He let lead­er­ship fight the battles over de­fund­ing Obama­care and rais­ing the debt ceil­ing — two is­sues squarely with­in his com­mit­tee’s jur­is­dic­tion — while he kept his fo­cus on tax re­form.

The Michigan Re­pub­lic­an held meet­ings in the com­mit­tee’s his­tor­ic Cap­it­ol cham­ber, and car­ried on the Re­pub­lic­ans’ tra­di­tion­al Wed­nes­day lunches be­neath the House floor. He even con­tin­ued a series of din­ners, in­ten­ded to in­vest law­makers deep­er in the pro­cess, as the budget im­passe per­sisted.

“Camp stands up,” said House Ma­jor­ity Whip Kev­in Mc­Carthy, R-Cal­if., who at­ten­ded one Power­Point-laden sup­per on Oct. 9. “He brings every­body to­geth­er to come to a din­ner, and then he starts walk­ing them through policy. So, here the mem­bers are in a more com­fort­able en­vir­on­ment; they are talk­ing policy. He is listen­ing to them, able to come back with the an­swers.”

Since he took the gavel al­most three years ago, Camp has en­deavored to lay the found­a­tion for a com­plete over­haul of the tax code, something Con­gress has not done in al­most 30 years. At a time when Con­gress bounces from crisis to crisis and is seem­ingly dead­locked on fisc­al mat­ters, the pro­spects for ma­jor re­forms are grim. But Camp re­mains de­term­ined to in­tro­duce a re­form bill this year, to per­suade Re­pub­lic­an lead­er­ship to back it, and to ul­ti­mately hash out a com­prom­ise that will bridge a di­vided Con­gress.

If he’s suc­cess­ful — and he’s run­ning out of time as chair­man to find out — it would provide a grand leg­acy, fol­low­ing a con­gres­sion­al ca­reer colored by less high-pro­file achieve­ments. And while few would bet on Camp suc­ceed­ing, many ap­plaud the ef­fort.

Mc­Carthy called Camp’s meth­od “a for­mula to show oth­er com­mit­tee chair­men how to move a com­mit­tee.”

“When he went to go lay out tax policy, he didn’t go tell people, ‘This is it,’ ” Mc­Carthy ad­ded. “He would go lay out, ‘This is a work­ing area, here are two dif­fer­ent ideas. What’s your in­put?’ He builds con­sensus and bey­ond be­fore he even moves something.”


In­deed, Camp has de­lib­er­ately taken a more open ap­proach to lead­ing the pan­el than some of his heavy-handed pre­de­cessors.

Camp wit­nessed le­gendary Chair­man Dan Ros­ten­kowski, D-Ill., close meet­ings to the press, draft le­gis­la­tion in the con­fer­ence room, and then push it through on proxy votes. Hot-tempered Chair­man Bill Thomas, R-Cal­if., may have ar­gued he was look­ing out for his mem­bers’ in­terests, but he of­ten shut them out of the pro­cess, no­tori­ously say­ing, “I’m in pro­duc­tion, not sales.”

Camp has brought a more in­clus­ive — if no less fo­cused — style to Ways and Means, which is as much a sign of the times as it is a re­flec­tion of Camp’s mild-mannered Mid­west­ern sens­ib­il­ity and his back­ground as a law­yer.

“What you really want to do is have a pro­cess where people have an op­por­tun­ity to weigh in, and it doesn’t mean they all agree, but at least there is an open pro­cess,” Camp said. “I’ve al­ways said, ‘You don’t al­ways get your way, but you get to have a say,’ and that is a philo­sophy I’ve tried to take to the whole is­sue of tax re­form.”

He has en­gaged in an enorm­ous edu­ca­tion­al cam­paign to bring law­makers up to speed on the mad­den­ingly lengthy and com­plic­ated tax code, and that it­self is a huge chal­lenge. Hardly any­one in power was around the last time the code was over­hauled in 1986. Re­pub­lic­an mem­ber­ship on the Ways and Means Com­mit­tee has had dra­mat­ic turnover in re­cent years, and only six of its 23 Re­pub­lic­ans were on the pan­el as far back as the 110th Con­gress six years ago. The rank and file are equally new to these is­sues; nearly two in five House mem­bers have served in Con­gress for less than three years.

Camp reas­ons that a trans­par­ent pro­cess al­lows a bet­ter ex­change of ideas. The ap­proach is clearly in­ten­ded to head off op­pos­i­tion in an era where lin­ing up a Re­pub­lic­an ma­jor­ity is no easy feat, des­pite the party’s con­trol of the House.

“I knew that this was a very big is­sue, and I thought the more know­ledge mem­bers had, the more part of the pro­cess they were, the more likely it would be that there would be buy in,” Camp said.


Camp’s polit­ic­al ca­reer was launched through his con­nec­tion to Bill Schuette, a child­hood play­mate in Mid­land, Mich., who was Camp’s pre­de­cessor in Con­gress and is now the Michigan at­tor­ney gen­er­al.

The two helped each oth­er win stu­dent-coun­cil races, and they shared secrets about the mis­chief they made at H.H. Dow High School (named after the founder of Dow Chem­ic­al, which is headquartered in Mid­land). They stayed in touch dur­ing law school, stood in each oth­er’s wed­dings, and re­turned to Mid­land to start their leg­al ca­reers.

Camp’s early work as a law­yer hand­ling child-ab­use, neg­lect, and ad­op­tion cases left a last­ing im­pres­sion. He was frus­trated with loop­holes in the law that let neg­lected chil­dren lan­guish in foster care for years without per­man­ent ad­opt­ive homes. So he later pushed changes in­to law in Con­gress that cre­ated in­cent­ives for states to ex­ped­ite ad­op­tions. Today, this body of work is among Camp’s sig­na­ture ac­com­plish­ments.

“I did a lot of so­cial-ser­vices leg­al work,” he said. “It was a real ex­per­i­ence in un­der­stand­ing people’s needs and con­cerns. That is kind of what drove me in­to it.”

But the path to be­com­ing a law­maker was not im­me­di­ate.

When Schuette ran for Con­gress, Camp served as an ad­viser and went with him to Wash­ing­ton when he won. Camp even­tu­ally left to serve one term in the Michigan House of Rep­res­ent­at­ives. When Schuette stepped down to chal­lenge Sen. Carl Lev­in, D-Mich., he en­dorsed Camp for his con­gres­sion­al seat.

Tax re­form — mainly lower­ing rates — was part of Camp’s plat­form even back then. Yet it was the prom­ise that Camp was guar­an­teed a seat on the House Ag­ri­cul­ture Com­mit­tee, which Schuette ar­ranged, that went a long way to se­cur­ing votes in the sprawl­ing ag­ri­cul­tur­al dis­trict where sug­ar beets flour­ish. Still, Camp was al­ways more in­ter­ested in busi­ness and tax is­sues than in ag­ri­cul­ture, and he set his sights on Ways and Means.

That was easi­er said than done. The com­mit­tee is one of the three most sought-after in the House. Be­cause lead­ers have his­tor­ic­ally tried to main­tain re­gion­al rep­res­ent­a­tion, new­comers typ­ic­ally have to wait for a mem­ber from their geo­graph­ic area to leave. Yet the com­mit­tee already had a Michigan Re­pub­lic­an.

So Camp got cre­at­ive and gen­er­ated a new map of the coun­try based on pop­u­la­tion. His map in­flated Michigan’s size and shrank rur­al states to make the case that Camp’s state de­served an­oth­er seat on the pan­el. He also ad­op­ted the long tra­di­tion of treat­ing it as in­tensely as a con­gres­sion­al cam­paign. When Camp could not per­suade a key hol­d­out to sup­port him, he took a gamble and dialed former Pres­id­ent Ford, a fel­low Michig­ander and a former House minor­ity lead­er.

“I called him in Cali­for­nia, not know­ing if he would even take the call, and his as­sist­ant answered the phone and she said hold for a minute,” Camp said. “And Pres­id­ent Ford came on and said, ‘Some­body owes me a fa­vor and I am go­ing to make a call on your be­half.’ “

It worked.

“He called some­body who was not sup­port­ing me who ended up chan­ging their vote and help­ing me, so it was a big deal,” Camp said. “And this mem­ber came up to me and said, ‘Any­body who can get Pres­id­ent Ford to call me, I’m for.’ “

Camp said he is pre­pared to go to the same lengths for his agenda. “I made the case,” he said, “just like I’m go­ing to do for tax re­form.”


Camp even­tu­ally won the rank­ing-mem­ber po­s­i­tion and be­came chair­man when Re­pub­lic­ans won the House in 2010. His de­but hear­ing on com­pre­hens­ive tax re­form set the stage for his agenda. Since then, Camp has con­vened more than 26 hear­ings on the sub­ject, in­clud­ing the first joint one with the Sen­ate Fin­ance Com­mit­tee in 70 years. In all, he has con­duc­ted more than 100 meet­ings on the top­ic. This year Camp met in­di­vidu­ally with every mem­ber of the com­mit­tee and has sat down with every GOP fresh­man.

Camp has de­veloped a stronger bond with Sen­ate Fin­ance Com­mit­tee Chair­man Max Baucus, D-Mont., than he has with rank­ing mem­ber Sander Lev­in, a fel­low Michig­ander with whom Camp has served on Ways and Means since he joined in 1993. When Con­gress is in ses­sion, Camp meets weekly with Baucus, a Demo­crat so in­clined to work with Re­pub­lic­ans that lib­er­als watch him war­ily. The two toured the coun­try to pro­mote re­form this sum­mer.

“We may not al­ways see eye-to-eye, but we share a mu­tu­al re­spect. And we share some sim­il­ar goals — in­clud­ing re­form­ing Amer­ica’s tax code,” Baucus said.

A rap­idly ap­proach­ing dead­line has ce­men­ted the pair’s re­la­tion­ship. Baucus is re­tir­ing from the Sen­ate at the end of this Con­gress in 2014, at which point Camp will have run out his six-year term lim­it for serving as chair­man.

Camp is try­ing to find a way for tax re­form to hitch a ride on the fisc­al de­bate. If he can­not, he vows to move his yet-to-be-un­veiled le­gis­la­tion out of the com­mit­tee this year. Camp’s sup­port­ers are quick to give him cred­it for ad­van­cing the dis­cus­sion — but without prom­ising it will suc­ceed.

“Tax re­form has al­ways been something that Re­pub­lic­ans have ad­voc­ated,” said Rep. Paul Ry­an, R-Wis., the Budget Com­mit­tee chair­man who is seen by many as next in line to head Ways and Means. “Dave Camp has done more to ad­vance tax re­form than any­body since 1986”¦. He is star­ing down all the naysay­ers and doubters, and mov­ing it farther than it has in dec­ades.”

But des­pite all the out­reach — in­clud­ing 11 work­ing groups, with bi­par­tis­an lead­er­ship — Camp’s pro­cess gets mixed re­views from Demo­crats.

Some busi­ness-friendly ones like com­mit­tee Reps. Ron Kind of Wis­con­sin and Richard Neal of Mas­sachu­setts, cred­it Camp for hear­ing them out. “Tax re­form is doable,” Neal said.

Still, Lev­in com­plains that Camp’s start­ing point is rev­en­ue-neut­ral tax re­form that lowers top rates for cor­por­a­tions and in­di­vidu­als to 25 per­cent, which is a non­starter for most Demo­crats. “They said, ‘We’ll agree to sit down on a bi­par­tis­an basis, only if you agree to ac­cept those three premises,’ ” Lev­in said. “That is totally un­sat­is­fact­ory.”

Rep. Jim Mc­Der­mott, D-Wash., says the situ­ation is com­plic­ated by the fact that Camp and Baucus are short-timers.

“There is no trust here,” Mc­Der­mott said. “Who is he speak­ing for? In 18 months he’s gone. Max Baucus is gone. So you have two guys who have one foot out the door talk­ing about do­ing tax re­form. I have not figured out how they think they are go­ing to ram this thing through.”


In Ju­ly of last year, Camp an­nounced he was bat­tling early-stage non-Hodgkin’s lymph­oma, a blood can­cer. He un­der­went chemo­ther­apy and lost his hair. His head was cold, and he felt self-con­scious see­ing him­self bald in the pages of The Wall Street Journ­al.

“He was truly shook up from the start and didn’t know if he would ne­ces­sar­ily make it,” said a long­time friend, Rep. Fred Up­ton, R-Mich., the chair­man of the House En­ergy and Com­merce Com­mit­tee.

“It was tough for him. He lost all of his hair and star­ted wear­ing a base­ball cap. A couple of our bald guys, like Kev­in Brady, con­fron­ted him on the floor and said, ‘What don’t you like about us? You think we are ugly?’

“With that he took it off, and it was a big change,” Up­ton said.

Camp did not miss a single vote dur­ing that time, even though he was ser­i­ously sick. Friends and col­leagues said he fo­cused on his fam­ily and kept show­ing up to work, which helped him muscle through. “You just have to get through it,” Camp said. “I got through it by ba­sic­ally pre­tend­ing I didn’t have it as much as I could.”

Camp an­nounced he was can­cer-free in Decem­ber, and he has not said what he’ll do after his chair­man­ship is fin­ished. Up­ton said Camp is push­ing harder than ever.

“I have lived my life in two-year bites for a while, but I really think you have to live the time you are in,” Camp said. “This is one where you have to make the most of every minute you are giv­en”¦. I’m really fo­cused on the time I have right now and not think­ing about what comes next.”

What We're Following See More »
Doesn’t Express Confidence in Marino
Trump to Declare Opioid Emergency Next Week
1 hours ago

After initially promising it in August, "President Trump said Monday that he will declare a national emergency next week to address the opioid epidemic." When asked, he also "declined to express confidence in Rep. Tom Marino (R-Pa.), his nominee for drug czar, in the wake of revelations that the lawmaker helped steer legislation making it harder to act against giant drug companies."

Trump Still Considering Yellen For Fed
9 hours ago

"President Donald Trump plans to formally interview Janet Yellen this week about potentially staying on as Federal Reserve chair, two people familiar with the matter said...Many Republicans on Capitol Hill want Trump to move on from Yellen, whose first term ends in February, and choose a more traditionally conservative Fed chair."

Trump Noncommittal on Marino
9 hours ago
Manchin Asks Trump to Drop Marino’s Nomination for Drug Czar
11 hours ago
McCaskill Will Introduce Bill in Response to “60 Minutes” Scoop
11 hours ago

In the wake of Sunday's blockbuster 60 Minutes/Washington Post report on opioid regulation and enforcement, Sen. Claire McCaskill (D-MO) has introduced legislation that "would repeal a 2016 law that hampered the Drug Enforcement Administration’s ability to regulate opioid distributors it suspects of misconduct." In a statement, McCaskill said: “Media reports indicate that this law has significantly affected the government’s ability to crack down on opioid distributors that are failing to meet their obligations and endangering our communities."


Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.