Meet the Kickstarter of Solar Energy

Mosaic is trying to radically change solar — by bringing it to everyone.

People enjoy the view from a lifeguard structure as the sun sets at Seal Beach, south of Los Angeles, California on July 9, 2012.
National Journal
Clare Foran
Add to Briefcase
Clare Foran
Oct. 24, 2013, 1 a.m.

One hun­dred and ninety-six per­fectly pol­ished sol­ar pan­els line the roof of the Oak­land, Cal­if., Youth Em­ploy­ment Part­ner­ship, a non­profit job-train­ing pro­gram for at-risk youth. The sys­tem is pro­jec­ted to save the cen­ter close to $25,000 in elec­tri­city costs over 10 years. And it happened in part be­cause of a star­tup that’s try­ing to change the way sol­ar pro­jects are brought to life.

In the past few dec­ades, the price of sol­ar pan­els has plummeted. As the tech­no­logy be­comes more af­ford­able, a vari­ety of path­ways have opened up for res­id­en­tial and com­mer­cial de­vel­op­ment, ran­ging from leas­ing to bank-fin­anced loans. But des­pite an ar­ray of fin­an­cing op­tions, mid-sized pro­jects — such as the in­stall­a­tion of photo­vol­ta­ic pan­els on a com­munity cen­ter or a school — of­ten face prob­lems rais­ing money to get off the ground.

That’s where Mo­sa­ic comes in.

Mo­sa­ic is an on­line plat­form that uses crowd­fund­ing to fin­ance in­vest­ments in sol­ar pro­jects. It works sim­il­ar to Kick­starter, with in­di­vidu­als post­ing pro­ject ideas to a cent­ral, on­line hub and so­li­cit­ing in­cre­ment­al dona­tions to fund them.

“You can go onto the plat­form, lo­gin in a few minutes and browse pro­jects you want to fund,” Billy Par­ish, one of Mo­sa­ic’s founders, ex­plains. “It’s really a new ex­per­i­ence from an in­vest­ing per­spect­ive and what you’re do­ing is par­ti­cip­at­ing in a loan to fin­ance a sol­ar pro­ject.”

Un­like Kick­starter, however, Mo­sa­ic pays in­vestors back. Once a pro­ject starts gen­er­at­ing rev­en­ue, in­vestors earn what they put in with in­terest. The com­pany of­fers a fixed rate of re­turn to in­vestors of between 4 to 7 per­cent an­nu­ally and levies a 1 per­cent fee on all trans­ac­tions. And par­ti­cipants can in­vest as little as $25 to start. The plat­form’s 2,500-plus in­vestors saw re­turns of ap­prox­im­ately $60,000 in Oc­to­ber alone.

This is pav­ing the way for an in­crease in the num­ber and kinds of sol­ar pro­jects that get fun­ded in the United States.

Mo­sa­ic has fully fun­ded 19 pro­jects in six states — Ari­zona, Cali­for­nia, Col­or­ado, Flor­ida, New Jer­sey, and New Mex­ico — and raised more than $5 mil­lion in cap­it­al in­vest­ment for sol­ar power. The com­pany was foun­ded in April 2011 but only began of­fer­ing a re­turn on in­vest­ment to the pub­lic in Janu­ary of this year.

Pro­jects fun­ded through the plat­form in­clude the in­stall­a­tion of more than than 2,000 sol­ar pan­els on the roof of a charter school in Den­ver and 400 sol­ar pan­els to gen­er­ate elec­tri­city for an af­ford­able-hous­ing com­plex for seni­ors in San Bruno, Cal­if. In­vestors also fun­ded a sol­ar in­stall­a­tion at San Diego’s Ron­ald Mc­Don­ald House.

Right now, without Mo­sa­ic, the most com­mon way to buy a sol­ar sys­tem for a res­id­ence or busi­ness is through a bank-fin­anced loan. Banks have strin­gent lend­ing re­quire­ments, however, and people with low in­come or bad cred­it are of­ten shut out en­tirely. Banks are also more likely to fin­ance com­mer­cial-scale pro­jects like a sol­ar farm owned by a util­ity com­pany than they are to pick up the tab for a mid-sized in­stall­a­tion. Ac­cord­ing to data com­piled by truSol­ar, a work­ing group of sol­ar in­dustry par­ti­cipants formed to es­tab­lish a stand­ard risk rat­ing, sim­il­ar to a cred­it score, for sol­ar pro­jects, only 5 per­cent of banks fin­ance loans for sol­ar pro­jects. And, based on the find­ings of Mo­sa­ic’s pro­ject fin­ance team, most banks won’t lend to pro­jects worth less than $10 mil­lion be­cause the trans­ac­tion costs are too high re­l­at­ive to the re­turn on in­vest­ment. 

Mo­sa­ic is chan­ging this dy­nam­ic by sidestep­ping tra­di­tion­al lenders and help­ing cre­ate a new class of in­vestors.

“For a school or a small busi­ness, the cost for a bank to do the un­der­writ­ing on a loan is so high that it just doesn’t pen­cil out,” Par­ish says. “But Mo­sa­ic is a fun­da­ment­ally dif­fer­ent busi­ness mod­el. We’re all on­line so we don’t have the over­head and we can help fin­ance these smal­ler pro­jects at lower cost.”

The com­pany’s goal is am­bi­tious: Mo­sa­ic wants any­one to be able to in­vest in sol­ar na­tion­wide. Due to a com­plex tangle of state-level se­cur­it­ies reg­u­la­tions, it hasn’t achieved this yet. But it’s on its way. Res­id­ents of New York and Cali­for­nia can in­vest in sol­ar pro­jects through Mo­sa­ic ir­re­spect­ive of cred­it his­tory or in­come and ac­cred­ited in­vestors who meet cer­tain qual­i­fy­ing cri­ter­ia in oth­er states can also join in.

“They’re really help­ing to grow the mar­ket for sol­ar,” An­drea Luecke, ex­ec­ut­ive dir­ect­or of the Sol­ar Found­a­tion, said. “They’re help­ing meet a need, which is what if you don’t own a house or you’re a renter, for ex­ample, then how do you sup­port sol­ar? Mo­sa­ic is provid­ing a new av­en­ue for people who are in­ter­ested in sol­ar and who can now in­vest in it without hav­ing to buy their own sol­ar pan­els, which was really the only way to sup­port it be­fore.”

It’s not just about the bot­tom line. Mo­sa­ic’s founders want to drive a trans­ition to a re­new­able-en­ergy eco­nomy and be­lieve the private sec­tor has a ma­jor role to play in ex­pand­ing ac­cess to sol­ar and oth­er forms of re­new­able en­ergy in the United States.

“The gov­ern­ment’s not go­ing to fund the next wave of in­fra­struc­ture by it­self,” Par­ish said. “They’ve played a crit­ic­al role in sup­port­ing re­search and de­vel­op­ment and provid­ing in­cent­ives. But we need tril­lions of dol­lars of fin­an­cing to trans­ition to 100 per­cent clean en­ergy and that’s mainly go­ing to come from privately raised cap­it­al. That’s what Mo­sa­ic is do­ing. We want to make it pos­sible for every­one to par­ti­cip­ate in that trans­ition and be­ne­fit from it.”

What We're Following See More »
Morning Consult Poll: Clinton Decisively Won Debate
17 hours ago

"According to a new POLITICO/Morning Consult poll, the first national post-debate survey, 43 percent of registered voters said the Democratic candidate won, compared with 26 percent who opted for the Republican Party’s standard bearer. Her 6-point lead over Trump among likely voters is unchanged from our previous survey: Clinton still leads Trump 42 percent to 36 percent in the race for the White House, with Libertarian nominee Gary Johnson taking 9 percent of the vote."

Trump Draws Laughs, Boos at Al Smith Dinner
1 days ago

After a lighthearted beginning, Donald Trump's appearance at the Al Smith charity dinner in New York "took a tough turn as the crowd repeatedly booed the GOP nominee for his sharp-edged jokes about his rival Hillary Clinton."

McMullin Leads in New Utah Poll
1 days ago

Evan McMul­lin came out on top in a Emer­son Col­lege poll of Utah with 31% of the vote. Donald Trump came in second with 27%, while Hillary Clin­ton took third with 24%. Gary John­son re­ceived 5% of the vote in the sur­vey.

Quinnipiac Has Clinton Up by 7
1 days ago

A new Quin­nipi­ac Uni­versity poll finds Hillary Clin­ton lead­ing Donald Trump by seven percentage points, 47%-40%. Trump’s “lead among men and white voters all but” van­ished from the uni­versity’s early Oc­to­ber poll. A new PPRI/Brook­ings sur­vey shows a much bigger lead, with Clinton up 51%-36%. And an IBD/TIPP poll leans the other way, showing a vir­tu­al dead heat, with Trump tak­ing 41% of the vote to Clin­ton’s 40% in a four-way match­up.

Trump: I’ll Accept the Results “If I Win”
1 days ago

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.