What You Need to Know From the Opening Statements at Today’s Health Care Hearing

Contractors responsible for getting the health care website running are testifying to the House this morning. Here are highlights from its beginning.

A man walks near the U.S. Capitol building before sunrise, on October 17, 2013 in Washington, DC.
National Journal
Brian Resnick, Matt Berman, Patrick Reis and Dustin Volz
Add to Briefcase
Brian Resnick , Matt Berman and Patrick Reis and Dustin Volz
Oct. 24, 2013, 6:03 a.m.

 The Health­Care.gov Con­gres­sion­al cir­cus has be­gun. On Thursday morn­ing, ex­ec­ut­ives from two of the con­tract­ors that were re­spons­ible for build­ing Health­Care.gov test­i­fied in front of the House En­ergy and Com­merce Com­mit­tee.

But don’t count on con­tri­tion: thus far, neither ex­ec­ut­ive has leapt to take blame for the site’s fail­ures. In­stead, blame is be­ing shif­ted to oth­er con­tract­ors or, most com­monly, to one party that’s not rep­res­en­ted on the pan­el: the Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion.

A wit­ness for CGI Fed­er­al, the com­pany most com­monly as­so­ci­ated with the troubled web­site, said the ad­min­is­tra­tion is ul­ti­mately re­spons­ible for the web­site’s qual­ity, and it blamed the ini­tial bot­tle­neck a part of the site it didn’t cre­ate: the “door­way,” where users set up ac­counts they’ll use later to shop for in­sur­ance. But a spokes­man for Optum, the com­pany re­spons­ible for de­vel­op­ing that door­way, said that bot­tle­neck was cre­ated by the ad­min­is­tra­tion’s “late” policy de­cision to re­quire all users to set up ac­counts be­fore brows­ing.

That’s un­likely to play well in front of Con­gress, however, as both Demo­crats and Re­pub­lic­ans ar­rived angry and are look­ing for an­swers. Rep. Frank Pal­lone (D-N.J.) per­haps summed up the mood best: “There are no clean hands here.”

Here are the biggest mo­ments from the open­ing testi­mon­ies at the start of the hear­ing.

Cheryl Camp­bell, Seni­or Vice-Pres­id­ent at CGI (The Ca­na­dian in­form­a­tion sys­tems con­tract­or)

“CGI Fed­er­al and the many oth­er con­tract­ors se­lec­ted to de­vel­op the Fed­er­al Ex­change per­form un­der the dir­ec­tion and su­per­vi­sion of CMS [Cen­ters for Medi­care and Medi­caid Ser­vices]. As I stated in my Septem­ber 10 testi­mony, CMS serves the im­port­ant role of sys­tems in­teg­rat­or or “quar­ter­back” on this pro­ject and is the ul­ti­mate re­spons­ible party for the end-to-end per­form­ance of the over­all Fed­er­al Ex­change.”

And…

“The first set of is­sues for users dealt with the en­ter­prise iden­tity man­age­ment (or EI­DM) func­tion provided by an­oth­er con­tract­or, which al­lows users to 6 cre­ate se­cure ac­counts. The EI­DM serves as the “front door” to the Fed­er­al Ex­change that a user must pass through be­fore en­ter­ing the FFM. Un­for­tu­nately, the EI­DM cre­ated a bot­tle­neck that pre­ven­ted the vast ma­jor­ity of users from ac­cess­ing the FFM. Since Oc­to­ber 1, CGI Fed­er­al has worked closely with CMS and oth­er con­tract­ors to troubleshoot solu­tions to this ‘front door’ prob­lem.”

Andy Slavitt, Group Ex­ec­ut­ive Vice-Pres­id­ent at Optum (build­er of the Data Ser­vices Hub)

“It is rel­ev­ant to note that the EI­DM [CMS’ En­ter­prise Iden­tity Man­age­ment] tool is only one piece of the fed­er­al mar­ket­place’s re­gis­tra­tion and ac­cess man­age­ment sys­tem, which in­volves mul­tiple vendors and pieces of tech­no­logy. While the EI­DM plays an im­port­ant role in the re­gis­tra­tion sys­tem, tools de­veloped by oth­er vendors handle crit­ic­al func­tions such as the user in­ter­face, the e-mail that is sent to the user to con­firm re­gis­tra­tion, the link that the user clicks on to ac­tiv­ate the ac­count, and the web page the user lands on. All these tools must work to­geth­er seam­lessly to en­sure smooth re­gis­tra­tion. After the launch, health­care.gov was in­und­ated by many more con­sumers than an­ti­cip­ated. Many of the crit­ic­al com­pon­ents de­veloped by these mul­tiple vendors were over­whelmed — the vir­tu­al data cen­ter en­vir­on­ment, the soft­ware, the data­base sys­tem, and the hard­ware, as well as our EI­DM tool.”

And…

“It ap­pears that one of the reas­ons for the high con­cur­rent volume at the re­gis­tra­tion sys­tem was a late de­cision re­quir­ing con­sumers to re­gister for an ac­count be­fore they could browse for in­sur­ance products. This may have driv­en high­er sim­ul­tan­eous us­age of the re­gis­tra­tion sys­tem that wouldn’t have oc­curred if con­sumers could “win­dow shop” an­onym­ously.”

Lynn Spel­lecy, cor­por­ate coun­sel at Equifax Work­force Solu­tions

The Equifax Work­force Solu­tions in­come veri­fic­a­tion solu­tion is work­ing as de­signed. Since the ex­changes first went live on Oc­to­ber 1, 2013, we have not ex­per­i­enced any sig­ni­fic­ant prob­lems or in­ter­rup­tions in the in­come veri­fic­a­tion solu­tion that we are provid­ing to CMS. We have suc­cess­fully re­ceived and re­spon­ded to veri­fic­a­tion re­quests re­gard­ing in­di­vidu­al ap­plic­ants from the fed­er­ally fa­cil­it­ated mar­ket­place as well as from state-based agen­cies “¦ Now that the fed­er­ally fa­cil­it­ated mar­ket­place is open, we are mon­it­or­ing the flow of veri­fic­a­tion re­quests from the hub to our serv­ers and back. We have not ex­per­i­enced any is­sues, down­times, or an­om­alies since the start date “¦ Our ser­vice avail­ab­il­ity has been at 100% to date and our av­er­age sys­tem re­sponse time to re­quests is un­der one second.”

House En­ergy and Com­merce Chair­man Fred Up­ton, R-Mich.

“This is more than a web­site prob­lem — and frankly, the web­site should have been the easy part. I’m also con­cerned about what hap­pens next. Will en­roll­ment glitches be­come pro­vider pay­ment glitches? Will pa­tients show up at their doc­tor’s of­fice or hos­pit­al only to be told they, or their cov­er­age, aren’t in the sys­tem?”

Rep. Henry Wax­man, D-Cal­if.

“The Af­ford­able Care Act is an enorm­ous suc­cess with one im­port­ant ex­cep­tion: It has a poorly de­signed web­site.”

What We're Following See More »
BUT IS HE A YES VOTE?
Cornyn Attempting to Get McCain Back for Health Vote
1 hours ago
THE LATEST
“TIME HAD RUN OUT” FOR ILL BABY
Charlie Gard’s Parents End Legal Fight
2 hours ago
THE LATEST

"A lawyer representing Chris Gard and Connie Yates told the High Court 'time had run out' for the baby. Mr. Gard said it meant his 'sweet, gorgeous, innocent little boy' will not reach his first birthday on 4 August. 'To let our beautiful little Charlie go' is 'the hardest thing we'll ever have to do,' his mother said. Charlie's parents said they made the decision because a US doctor had told them it was now too late to give Charlie nucleoside therapy.

Source:
AGENCY SOUGHT TO DELAY IMPLEMENTATION
11 States Sue EPA Over Chemical Rule
2 hours ago
THE DETAILS

"Eleven states have sued the Environmental Protection Agency over its June decision to delay implementation of a chemical safety rule" until 2019. "The state attorneys general, led by New York’s Eric Schneiderman (D), argue the rule is important for 'protecting our workers, first-responders and communities from chemical accidents' and should be allowed to take affect as planned by the Obama administration’s EPA.

Source:
ULTIMATUM ON ACA
Trump: You’re With Us Or Against Us
2 hours ago
THE LATEST
$1.6 BILLION SET ASIDE FOR WALL
House Freedom Caucus Chair: Shutdown Over Wall Funding Unlikely
3 hours ago
THE DETAILS

"House Freedom Caucus Chairman Mark Meadows (R-N.C.) on Monday said that funding for President Trump's controversial border wall is unlikely to cause a government shutdown. 'The odds of a government shutdown are very minimal when it comes to that,' the conservative lawmaker said at an event in Washington, D.C. 'I do think the funding of the border wall will happen,' he added. Appropriators have set aside $1.6 billion to fund new wall and fencing sections on parts of the U.S.-Mexico border covering a few dozen miles."

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login