U.S. in Talks with Turkey over Antimissile Deal with China

Global Security Newswire Staff
See more stories about...
Global Security Newswire Staff
Oct. 24, 2013, 7:02 a.m.

The United States is in the midst of talks with Tur­key about its pending deal to pur­chase Chinese mis­sile-de­fense tech­no­logy, which a U.S. of­fi­cial said could have neg­at­ive im­plic­a­tions for the col­lect­ive se­cur­ity of NATO, Agence France-Presse re­por­ted.

Ank­ara an­nounced in Septem­ber it had chosen the Chinese-state owned China Pre­ci­sion Ma­chinery Ex­port-Im­port Corp. to provide Tur­key with a long-range air-and-mis­sile-de­fense sys­tem at a cost of $4 bil­lion. The forth­com­ing deal has wor­ried some U.S. law­makers and the head of NATO, be­cause of wor­ries the Chinese tech­no­logy will not be com­pat­ible with oth­er al­li­ance mem­ber states’ an­ti­mis­sile tech­no­logy. Those sys­tems are sup­posed to be able to con­nect with each an­oth­er, in ac­cord­ance with a plan to es­tab­lish a com­pre­hens­ive bal­list­ic-mis­sile shield. There are also con­cerns Chinese de­velopers could in­stall di­git­al back­doors in­to the tech­no­logy so that they could gain ac­cess to NATO data and mil­it­ary plans.

“We are now deal­ing with a stra­tegic mu­tu­al-de­fense ques­tion” and not simply a busi­ness de­cision, U.S. Am­bas­sad­or to Tur­key Fran­cis Ric­ciardone said to journ­al­ists in Ank­ara.

“It’s Tur­key’s sov­er­eign right to make its own de­cisions about de­fense ac­quis­i­tions,” the am­bas­sad­or said. “There is no chal­lenge, there’s no dis­agree­ment between us but we are ser­i­ously con­cerned about what this means for al­lied mis­sile air de­fense.”

The United States is car­ry­ing out spe­cial­ist-level talks with Tur­key with the aim of mak­ing sure Ank­ara is aware of all tech­nic­al de­tails as it weighs en­ter­ing in­to a fi­nal deal with China, Ric­ciardone said.

Turk­ish Prime Min­is­ter Re­cep Tayyip Er­dogan on Wed­nes­day stood by the de­cision to choose the Chinese firm over bids offered by European and Amer­ic­an weapons con­tract­ors that were more ex­pens­ive.

“For the mo­ment, China is of­fer­ing the best con­di­tions,” which in­clude ful­filling Tur­key’s de­sire for the an­ti­mis­sile sys­tem to be co-pro­duced to al­low for tech­no­logy trans­fer, Er­dogan said. He did not spe­cify when a fi­nal de­term­in­a­tion on go­ing for­ward with the deal might be made.

Er­dogan dis­reg­arded cri­ti­cisms the Chinese tech­no­logy would not be com­pat­ible with oth­er NATO sys­tems, not­ing that “mem­ber coun­tries routinely have Rus­si­an arms and equip­ment in their in­vent­or­ies.”

What We're Following See More »
How Coal Country Went from Blue to Red
41 minutes ago
History Already Being Less Kind to Hastert’s Leadership
3 hours ago

In light of his recent confessions, the speakership of Dennis Hastert is being judged far more harshly. The New York Times' Carl Hulse notes that in hindsight, Hastert now "fares poorly" on a number of fronts, from his handling of the Mark Foley page scandal to "an explosion" of earmarks to the weakening of committee chairmen. "Even his namesake Hastert rule—the informal standard that no legislation should be brought to a vote without the support of a majority of the majority — has come to be seen as a structural barrier to compromise."

Trump Ill Prepared for General Election
3 hours ago

Even if "[t]he Republican presidential nomination may be in his sights ... Trump has so far ignored vital preparations needed for a quick and effective transition to the general election. The New York businessman has collected little information about tens of millions of voters he needs to turn out in the fall. He's sent few people to battleground states compared with likely Democratic rival Hillary Clinton, accumulated little if any research on her, and taken no steps to build a network capable of raising the roughly $1 billion needed to run a modern-day general election campaign."

Congress Can’t Seem Not to Pay Itself
6 hours ago

Rep. Dave Young can't even refuse his own paycheck. The Iowa Republican is trying to make a point that if Congress can't pass a budget (it's already missed the April 15 deadline) then it shouldn't be paid. But, he's been informed, the 27th Amendment prohibits him from refusing his own pay. "Young’s efforts to dock his own pay, however, are duck soup compared to his larger goal: docking the pay of every lawmaker when Congress drops the budget ball." His bill to stiff his colleagues has only mustered the support of three of them. Another bill, sponsored by Rep. Jim Cooper (D-TN), has about three dozen co-sponsors.

How Far Away from Cleveland is the California GOP Staying?
7 hours ago

Sixty miles away, in Sandusky, Ohio. "We're pretty bitter about that," said Harmeet Dhillon, vice chairwoman of the California Republican Party. "It sucks to be California, we're like the ugly stepchild. They need us for our cash and our donors, they don't need us for anything else."