Scaled-back renewable-fuels targets leaked from the Environmental Protection Agency are still excessive, the American Petroleum Institute said in a Thursday press call. EPA is “moving in the right direction” with the reductions, said Bob Greco, API’s director of downstream activities, but still “needs to go lower.”
API’s goals aren’t far from the new EPA standards, which remain preliminary and have not been verified. The group is calling for production mandates of 12.9 million gallons of corn ethanol; the EPA draft circulated earlier this month would set levels at 13 million gallons. “The concern is they’re trying to shave this so close,” Greco said. “We don’t think the EPA has gone far enough if the leaked proposal is accurate.”
The problem, according to API, is that biofuel mandates were set with assumptions that gasoline demand would continue to increase, which has not been the case. Greco cited a study that said too-high ethanol mandates would decrease U.S. GDP by $770 billion and take-home pay by $580 billion. Continued hikes in the production mandate, Greco said, would push the U.S. past the “blend wall”—the 10 percent of ethanol content currently the standard for most cars’ fuel. “Passing the blend wall would cause a … fuel-cost increase and fuel-supply disruptions,” he said. “We need the EPA to act immediately to provide relief to consumers.”
Even if the agency’s lowered proposals end up as the final targets, Greco said it will not affect API’s lawsuits challenging EPA’s mandates. He reiterated that the group is still prepared to file suit if the agency fails to meet a Nov. 30 deadline for next year’s mandates.
What We're Following See More »
"Even if House Republicans manage to get enough members of their party on board with the latest version of their health care bill, they will face another battle in the Senate: whether the bill complies with the chamber’s arcane ... Byrd rule, which stipulates all provisions in a reconciliation bill must affect federal spending and revenues in a way that is not merely incidental." Democrats should have the advantage in that fight, "unless the Senate pulls another 'nuclear option.'”
The House has passed a one-week spending bill that will avert a government shutdown which was set to begin at midnight. Lawmakers now have an extra week to come to a longer agreement which is expected to fund the government through the end of the fiscal year in September. The legislation now goes to the Senate, where it is expected to pass before President Trump signs it.
President Trump’s portrayal of an effort to funnel more Medicaid dollars to Puerto Rico as a "bailout" is complicating negotiations over a continuing resolution on the budget. "House Democrats are now requiring such assistance as a condition for supporting the continuing resolution," a position that the GOP leadership is amenable to. "But Mr. Trump’s apparent skepticism aligns him with conservative House Republicans inclined to view its request as a bailout, leaving the deal a narrow path to passage in Congress."
Democrats in the House are threatening to shut down the government if Republicans expedite a vote on a bill to repeal and replace Obamacare, said Democratic House Whip Steny Hoyer Thursday. Lawmakers have introduced a one-week spending bill to give themselves an extra week to reach a long-term funding deal, which seemed poised to pass easily. However, the White House is pressuring House Republicans to take a vote on their Obamacare replacement Friday to give Trump a legislative victory, though it is still not clear that they have the necessary votes to pass the health care bill. This could go down to the wire.