Hagel: NATO Must Do More to ‘Deal with’ Cyber Attacks

Global Security Newswire Staff
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Global Security Newswire Staff
Oct. 24, 2013, 9:02 a.m.

NATO de­fense min­is­ters agreed this week that they must “do more to deal with cy­ber threats,” U.S. De­fense Sec­ret­ary Chuck Hagel said on Wed­nes­day, as the al­li­ance pre­pared to launch a new cy­ber-de­fense cen­ter next week.

Cy­ber­se­cur­ity was one of the main top­ics de­fense lead­ers from the 28-na­tion NATO dis­cussed on Tues­day and Wed­nes­day dur­ing a two-day min­is­teri­al in Brus­sels. Hagel on Wed­nes­day told re­port­ers that the al­li­ance’s new cy­ber-de­fense sys­tem — the Com­puter In­cid­ent Re­sponse Cen­ter — “is on track to achieve full op­er­a­tion­al cap­ab­il­it­ies next week.”

“The U.S. sup­ports a pro­pos­al for the cen­ter to have teams of NATO cy­ber ex­perts that can be quickly de­ployed to as­sist al­lied na­tions if they re­quest help in deal­ing with cy­ber in­tru­sions or at­tacks,” Hagel ad­ded. “It was agreed that the al­li­ance must do more to deal with cy­ber threats, and this will re­main a top pri­or­ity go­ing for­ward.”

Al­li­ance mem­bers in June iden­ti­fied pro­tect­ing NATO com­puter sys­tems from cy­ber in­tru­sions as a pri­or­ity at a min­is­teri­al meet­ing. NATO Sec­ret­ary Gen­er­al An­ders Fogh Rasmussen said dur­ing a Tues­day press con­fer­ence that de­fense min­is­ters that day “con­cluded that we are on track in up­grad­ing our abil­ity to pro­tect NATO’s net­works against this fast-evolving threat.”

Rasmussen ad­ded that while cy­ber de­fense is a “na­tion­al re­spons­ib­il­ity” for mem­ber na­tions, the mil­it­ary lead­ers at the min­is­teri­al agreed that NATO should “play a use­ful role to fa­cil­it­ate the de­vel­op­ment of strong na­tion­al cy­ber de­fense cap­ab­il­it­ies.” He gave ex­amples of NATO’s role in this realm — in­clud­ing set­ting out the de­fens­ive cap­ab­il­it­ies na­tions should have; con­duct­ing joint cy­ber edu­ca­tion and train­ing ex­er­cises; help­ing na­tions to de­vel­op cy­ber-de­fense cap­ab­il­it­ies in joint pro­jects; and “shar­ing in­form­a­tion, in­tel­li­gence and best prac­tices amongst al­lies.”

At least one ana­lyst main­tains NATO should do more to help pro­tect mem­ber na­tions’ net­works from hack­ers.

Daniel Pit­cairn, a re­search fel­low with Gov­ern­ment Busi­ness Coun­cil, wrote in De­fense One that he has con­cerns with NATO’s de­cision to not be re­spons­ible for the na­tion­al net­work se­cur­ity of mem­ber states. That cre­ates a prob­lem for the United States, he said, be­cause its sens­it­ive data re­gard­ing mil­it­ary as­set and strategies could be com­prom­ised be­cause of oth­er NATO coun­tries’ more-vul­ner­able net­works.

“Of greatest con­cern is the in­form­a­tion al­lies are per­mit­ted to re­ceive re­gard­ing U.S. nuc­le­ar weapons,” Pit­cairn said. “The ATOMAL Agree­ment of 1965 al­lows NATO al­lies to re­ceive con­fid­en­tial in­form­a­tion on U.S. nuc­le­ar weapons cap­ab­il­it­ies and strategy in or­der to en­sure the al­li­ance’s ef­fect­ive col­lect­ive mil­it­ary ca­pa­city. New and as­pir­ing mem­bers of NATO may not be pre­pared to de­fend their net­works from the growth in cy­ber at­tacks they will face when they be­come privy to crit­ic­al U.S. na­tion­al se­cur­ity in­form­a­tion.”

Pit­cairn fur­ther as­ser­ted “the out­stand­ing ques­tion” for NATO’s cy­ber strategy is wheth­er its Art­icle 5 stat­ute — which says “an armed at­tack against one or more… shall be con­sidered an at­tack against them all” — should ap­ply to cy­ber at­tacks.

“Just as the U.S. has as­ser­ted that it ‘will re­spond to hos­tile acts in cy­ber­space just as [it] would to any oth­er threat,’ so should NATO be pre­pared to use its full cap­ab­il­it­ies to counter cy­ber at­tacks,” he wrote.

What We're Following See More »
THE PLAN ALL ALONG?
Manchin Drops Objections, Clearing Way for Spending Deal
6 hours ago
THE LATEST

"The Senate standstill over a stopgap spending bill appeared headed toward a resolution on Friday night. Senators who were holding up the measure said votes are expected later in the evening. West Virginia Democrat Joe Manchin had raised objections to the continuing resolution because it did not include a full year's extension of retired coal miners' health benefits," but Manchin "said he and other coal state Democrats agreed with Senate Democratic leaders during a caucus meeting Thursday that they would not block the continuing resolution, but rather use the shutdown threat as a way to highlight the health care and pension needs of the miners."

Source:
UNCLEAR WHAT CAUSED CHANGE OF HEART
Giuliani Out of Running For State
9 hours ago
BREAKING

Donald Trump transition team announced Friday afternoon that top supporter Rudy Giuliani has taken himself out of the running to be in Trump's cabinet, though CNN previously reported that it was Trump who informed the former New York City mayor that he would not be receiving a slot. While the field had seemingly been narrowed last week, it appears to be wide open once again, with ExxonMobil CEO Rex Tillerson the current favorite.

Source:
BEGINS AT MIDNIGHT ABSENT SENATE ACTION
Feds Begin Prepping for Government Shutdown
10 hours ago
THE LATEST

Given the Senate's inaction on the continuing budget resolution (so far), the White House "said it has begun to work with agencies to prepare for the possibility of a large swath of the federal workforce being furloughed without pay beginning at midnight." Even if a shutdown occurs, however, "Senate procedures will allow the chamber to approve the CR with only a handful of Democrats in support by Sunday morning. Of the roughly 900,000 federal employees who were subject to furloughs in agencies’ most recent calculations, most would not be materially impacted as they do not work on weekends."

Source:
ALSO VICE-CHAIR OF TRUMP’S TRANSITION TEAM
Trump Taps Rep. McMorris Rodgers for Interior Secretary
14 hours ago
BREAKING
SHUTDOWN LOOMING
House Approves Spending Bill
1 days ago
BREAKING

The House has completed it's business for 2016 by passing a spending bill which will keep the government funded through April 28. The final vote tally was 326-96. The bill's standing in the Senate is a bit tenuous at the moment, as a trio of Democratic Senators have pledged to block the bill unless coal miners get a permanent extension on retirement and health benefits. The government runs out of money on Friday night.

×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login