President Obama asserted he was confident Pakistan is committed to maintaining security around its nuclear arsenal on Wednesday, just weeks after it was revealed the U.S. intelligence community has made surveillance of the South Asian country’s nuclear sites one of its top priorities.
In a joint statement released following a meeting at the White House between Obama and Pakistani Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif, the U.S. leader “reiterated his confidence in Pakistan’s commitment and dedication to nuclear security and recognized that Pakistan is fully engaged with the international community on nuclear safety and security issues.”
The U.S. government in the past has publicly touted Islamabad’s commitment to nuclear security when new concerns were raised that Pakistani-based extremists — who have carried out attacks in recent years on large Pakistani military bases — might be able to penetrate one of the country’s facilities where nuclear weapons or materials are held. The validity of those public assurances took a hit in September when it was revealed — through documents leaked by former NSA contractor Edward Snowden — that keeping tabs on the security of Pakistan’s nuclear, chemical and biological facilities was consuming a growing share of U.S. intelligence agencies’ black budget.
An analysis of the documents leaked by Snowden to the Washington Post shows the U.S. government is concerned about the lack of information it has on how exactly nuclear material is spread out around Pakistan’s facilities.
The concerns of the U.S. intelligence community were not in evidence in the public statement released on Wednesday. Rather, Obama noted his appreciation with “Pakistan’s constructive engagement with the Nuclear Security Summit Process and its cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency and other international forums” and acknowledged “Pakistan’s efforts to improve its strategic trade controls.”
The statement did not touch on concerns by the U.S. government that Pakistan’s recent focus on developing compact lower-yield nuclear weapons might make it easier for extremists groups to steal off with an entire warhead, the New York Times reported.
- 1 The Story of 2016: Republicans Feeling “Betrayed” by Their Leaders
- 2 The 14 House Primaries to Watch Tuesday
- 3 After Trump, GOP Foreign Policy Faces an Uncertain Future
- 4 Climate Stances Put Pressure on Major Trade Groups
- 5 Smart Ideas: Oil Pipelines vs. Oil Trains, and the Next Generation of Biological Threats
What We're Following See More »
“Hillary Clinton’s advisers are talking to Donald J. Trump’s ghostwriter of The Art of the Deal, seeking insights about Mr. Trump’s deepest insecurities as they devise strategies to needle and undermine him in four weeks at the first presidential debate, the most anticipated in a generation. ... Her team is also getting advice from psychology experts to help create a personality profile of Mr. Trump to gauge how he may respond to attacks and deal with a woman as his sole adversary on the debate stage.”
"Humanity’s impact on the Earth is now so profound that a new geological epoch—the Anthropocene—needs to be declared," according to a panel of scientists. "The new epoch should begin about 1950, the experts said, and was likely to be defined by the radioactive elements dispersed across the planet by nuclear bomb tests, although an array of other signals, including plastic pollution, soot from power stations, concrete, and even the bones left by the global proliferation of the domestic chicken."
The House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform has requested documents from the CEO of Mylan, "the pharmaceutical company under fire after raising the price of EpiPens more than 400 percent since 2007." Meanwhile, top members of the Energy and Commerce Committee are pressing the FDA on the lack of generic competition for EpiPens.
Perhaps Donald Trump can take a plebiscite to solve this whole messy immigration thing. At a Fox News town hall with Sean Hannity last night, Trump essentially admitted he's "stumped," turning to the audience and asking: “Can we go through a process or do you think they have to get out? Tell me, I mean, I don’t know, you tell me.”