How Did The White House Find Its Twitter Mole?

The same way leakers are always surfaced ““ with misinformation.

Logos for the microblogging site Twitter, displayed on the internet on September 13, 2013 in London, England.
National Journal
Tom DeFrank
Oct. 24, 2013, 10:25 a.m.

The sting that helped furi­ous White House plumb­ers un­mask the Na­tion­al Se­cur­ity Coun­cil of­fi­cial driv­ing them crazy with snarky Tweets is a time-honored device of­ten em­ployed at high levels of gov­ern­ment to identi­fy leak­ers.

“It’s an easy way to nail some­body who talks too much,” laughed a former seni­or polit­ic­al ad­viser to a Re­pub­lic­an pres­id­ent ex­pert in such ploys. “You drop a harm­less little nug­get in­to a meet­ing where every­one is in on the scam ex­cept the sus­pec­ted leak­er. Then when the in­form­a­tion pops up some­where - bingo.”

Na­tion­al Se­cur­ity Coun­cil staffer Jofi Joseph was fired last week after be­ing ex­posed as the cre­at­ive tal­ent be­hind @nat­sec­wonk, an an­onym­ous Twit­ter ac­count that routinely trashed such Obama heavy-hit­ters as coun­selor Valer­ie Jar­rett (“vacu­ous cipher”), NSC chief Susan Rice and UN am­bas­sad­or Sam­antha Power - not to men­tion former sec­ret­ary of state Hil­lary Clin­ton and oth­er Obama­World stal­warts.

Pub­lished re­ports say that top Obama ad­visers, en­raged and em­bar­rassed by the com­ment­ary, de­cided to leak in­noc­u­ous ma­ter­i­al to Joseph to see if it turned up on the no­tori­ous snark-site. It’s not clear the ploy pro­duced the pro­ver­bi­al “smoking gun,” but sud­denly Joseph was fired. In a state­ment, he ad­mit­ted to be­ing the an­onym­ous agent- pro­vocateur and apo­lo­gized to “every­one I in­sul­ted.”

There’s a fam­ous co­rol­lary to this prac­tice that helped un­der­mine White House chief of staff Don­ald Regan. Dur­ing Ron­ald Re­agan’s second term, some seni­or White House of­fi­cials eager to grease the skids un­der Regan con­cocted snappy one-liners cer­tain to make it in­to print from ap­pre­ci­at­ive journ­al­ists. But there was a twist: the an­onym­ous quotes of­ten con­tained a fa­vor­ite Regan phrase (“and the like”). When Nancy Re­agan, nev­er a Regan fan, saw some of the pro­voc­at­ive quotes she im­me­di­ately as­sumed Regan was the leak­er. Nancy’s rage was a prime factor in Regan be­ing forced out of his job in 1987.

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
These (Supposed) Iowa and NH Escorts Tell All
2 hours ago
NATIONAL JOURNAL AFTER DARK

Before we get to the specifics of this exposé about escorts working the Iowa and New Hampshire primary crowds, let’s get three things out of the way: 1.) It’s from Cosmopolitan; 2.) most of the women quoted use fake (if colorful) names; and 3.) again, it’s from Cosmopolitan. That said, here’s what we learned:

  • Business was booming: one escort who says she typically gets two inquiries a weekend got 15 requests in the pre-primary weekend.
  • Their primary season clientele is a bit older than normal—”40s through mid-60s, compared with mostly twentysomething regulars” and “they’ve clearly done this before.”
  • They seemed more nervous than other clients, because “the stakes are higher when you’re working for a possible future president” but “all practiced impeccable manners.”
  • One escort “typically enjoy[s] the company of Democrats more, just because I feel like our views line up a lot more.”
Source:
STATE VS. FEDERAL
Restoring Some Sanity to Encryption
2 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

No matter where you stand on mandating companies to include a backdoor in encryption technologies, it doesn’t make sense to allow that decision to be made on a state level. “The problem with state-level legislation of this nature is that it manages to be both wildly impractical and entirely unenforceable,” writes Brian Barrett at Wired. There is a solution to this problem. “California Congressman Ted Lieu has introduced the ‘Ensuring National Constitutional Rights for Your Private Telecommunications Act of 2016,’ which we’ll call ENCRYPT. It’s a short, straightforward bill with a simple aim: to preempt states from attempting to implement their own anti-encryption policies at a state level.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
What the Current Crop of Candidates Could Learn from JFK
2 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Hillary Is Running Against the Bill of 1992
2 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

The New Covenant. The Third Way. The Democratic Leadership Council style. Call it what you will, but whatever centrist triangulation Bill Clinton embraced in 1992, Hillary Clinton wants no part of it in 2016. Writing for Bloomberg, Sasha Issenberg and Margaret Talev explore how Hillary’s campaign has “diverged pointedly” from what made Bill so successful: “For Hillary to survive, Clintonism had to die.” Bill’s positions in 1992—from capital punishment to free trade—“represented a carefully calibrated diversion from the liberal orthodoxy of the previous decade.” But in New Hampshire, Hillary “worked to juggle nostalgia for past Clinton primary campaigns in the state with the fact that the Bill of 1992 or the Hillary of 2008 would likely be a marginal figure within today’s Democratic politics.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Trevor Noah Needs to Find His Voice. And Fast.
3 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

At first, “it was pleasant” to see Trevor Noah “smiling away and deeply dimpling in the Stewart seat, the seat that had lately grown gray hairs,” writes The Atlantic‘s James Parker in assessing the new host of the once-indispensable Daily Show. But where Jon Stewart was a heavyweight, Noah is “a very able lightweight, [who] needs time too. But he won’t get any. As a culture, we’re not about to nurture this talent, to give it room to grow. Our patience was exhausted long ago, by some other guy. We’re going to pass judgment and move on. There’s a reason Simon Cowell is so rich. Impress us today or get thee hence. So it comes to this: It’s now or never, Trevor.”

Source:
×