Syria’s Chemical Arms Likely Can Be Exported for Disposal: Expert

Rachel Oswald, Global Security Newswire
See more stories about...
Rachel Oswald, Global Security Newswire
Oct. 24, 2013, 11:02 a.m.

WASH­ING­TON — Most of Syr­ia’s chem­ic­al weapons likely can be trans­por­ted safely out of the coun­try for dis­pos­al else­where, though it re­mains to be seen which if any na­tions vol­un­tar­ily would al­low the agents with­in their bor­ders, a lead­ing chem­ic­al ex­pert said on Wed­nes­day.

The Or­gan­iz­a­tion for the Pro­hib­i­tion of Chem­ic­al Weapons is over­see­ing the de­struc­tion of the es­tim­ated 1,000 met­ric tons of chem­ic­al-war­fare ma­ter­i­als held by Pres­id­ent Bashar As­sad’s re­gime in civil-war-torn Syr­ia.

The “chances are we’re go­ing to ship them out of Syr­ia,” provided the chem­ic­als are still in pre­curs­or form, said Paul Walk­er, a pro­gram dir­ect­or at Green Cross In­ter­na­tion­al, which has fa­cil­it­ated the dis­pos­al of oth­er na­tions’ chem­ic­al ar­sen­als.

Speak­ing at an event in Wash­ing­ton, Walk­er said he ex­pects the Syr­i­an weapons in ques­tion have no live agents — mean­ing none of the chem­ic­als have been mixed to­geth­er and poured in­to mu­ni­tions con­tain­ing pro­pel­lants and ex­plos­ives — and thus can be sent safely to an­oth­er coun­try for de­struc­tion.

“I think the stock­pile is prob­ably al­most 100 per­cent pre­curs­or chem­ic­als,” Walk­er told a for­um or­gan­ized by the Amer­ic­an As­so­ci­ation for the Ad­vance­ment of Sci­ence and the Fed­er­a­tion of Amer­ic­an Sci­ent­ists.

Dam­as­cus agreed in re­cent weeks to de­clare its chem­ic­al ar­sen­al and to sur­render it for dis­pos­al as part of a U.N. Se­cur­ity Coun­cil-brokered agree­ment. The deal came about after the United States threatened to carry out re­pris­al air strikes on the As­sad re­gime as pun­ish­ment for the Syr­i­an mil­it­ary’s widely as­sumed sar­in gas at­tack on ci­vil­ians in Au­gust.

It is not pub­licly known how much of Syr­ia’s ar­sen­al is in pre­curs­or or live-agent form. Syr­ia is ex­pec­ted to make its fi­nal de­clar­a­tion to The Hag­ue, Neth­er­lands-based Or­gan­iz­a­tion for the Pro­hib­i­tion of Chem­ic­al Weapons about the ex­act con­tents of its chem­ic­al ar­sen­al and their cur­rent dis­pos­i­tion be­fore next Monday. The de­clar­a­tion when it comes will be clas­si­fied, Walk­er said.

OP­CW mon­it­ors on the ground are wrap­ping up in­spec­tion vis­its to each of the coun­try’s 23 de­clared chem­ic­al sites, where they are doc­u­ment­ing the types of agents and mu­ni­tions they find. Pub­lic state­ments com­ing from some European na­tions in re­cent days sug­gest a large-enough amount of the chem­ic­als are in pre­curs­or form that the United States is reach­ing out to for­eign na­tions to see if they would tem­por­ar­ily ac­cept them.

If the chem­ic­al-dis­pos­al work can take place out­side of Syr­ia, it would al­low the OP­CW mon­it­ors over­see­ing the dis­pos­al of chem­ic­al-pro­duc­tion equip­ment to leave be­hind the ex­plo­sions and bomb­ings from the Syr­i­an civil war, Walk­er said.

Ad­di­tion­ally, mov­ing the bulk chem­ic­al agents out of Syr­ia to an­oth­er loc­a­tion would in­crease the like­li­hood of their com­plete de­struc­tion tak­ing place in time to meet an in­ter­na­tion­ally set dead­line of mid-2014, he said.

Walk­er spec­u­lated that roughly 70 per­cent of the bulk chem­ic­als are pre­curs­or agents for sar­in nerve gas and the oth­er 30 per­cent are pre­curs­or ma­ter­i­als for mus­tard blister agent.

Still up in the air is where the chem­ic­als could be shipped to. Sev­er­al coun­tries presently are be­ing dis­cussed as po­ten­tial hosts for the dis­pos­al work, in­clud­ing Al­bania, Bel­gi­um, France and Nor­way.

“It turns out that the United States asked most of West­ern Europe … wheth­er they would help” by host­ing the chem­ic­al-dis­pos­al work, said Walk­er, a former House Armed Ser­vices Com­mit­tee staff mem­ber. “From my un­der­stand­ing, these are the four coun­tries that didn’t say no. None of them have said yes yet.”

Of those na­tions, Nor­way has been send­ing out the most-pos­it­ive sig­nals that it might agree to host the de­mil­it­ar­iz­a­tion work, ac­cord­ing to Walk­er. “Nor­way has not dealt with much of this [chem­ic­al-weapons dis­pos­al] at all. It has no such cap­ab­il­ity, but ob­vi­ously is a very good coun­try, I think, and wants to com­mit to de­struc­tion and help out.”

Den­mark also has said it is pre­pared to help out in whatever way it can with the chem­ic­al-de­mil­it­ar­iz­a­tion ef­fort.

An­oth­er is­sue to con­sider is wheth­er the in­ter­na­tion­al-dis­pos­al pro­ject will have enough re­sources, in the form of money and trained per­son­nel, to com­plete the de­mil­it­ar­iz­a­tion pro­gram in roughly eight months, said Mi­chael Mood­ie, a seni­or spe­cial­ist in in­ter­na­tion­al af­fairs and de­fense is­sues at the Con­gres­sion­al Re­search Ser­vice.

“The di­men­sions of the pro­gram, giv­en the timeline that they have set for them­selves, is really quite re­mark­able and may re­quire a level of re­sources … that thus far may be un­der­es­tim­ated,” Mood­ie said at the Wed­nes­day gath­er­ing.

Walk­er noted in re­cent years “there has been heavy pres­sure by the ma­jor fun­ders of OP­CW” — in­clud­ing the United States, Ja­pan, Ger­many and oth­er West­ern European na­tions — to scale back the dis­arm­a­ment body’s budget.

The chem­ic­al-mon­it­or­ing and in­spec­tions or­gan­iz­a­tion — which earli­er this month was awar­ded the No­bel Peace Prize — also has had to downs­ize its staff of in­spect­ors from 200 to 112, ac­cord­ing to Walk­er, who ad­ded that 14 new per­son­nel cur­rently are re­ceiv­ing train­ing.

The vet­er­an chem­ic­al-weapons spe­cial­ist es­tim­ated it would cost more than $100 mil­lion to carry out the Syr­i­an chem­ic­al weapons-dis­pos­al pro­ject.

“There’s no money [in the OP­CW budget] for an op­er­a­tion of this nature,” he said.

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
When It Comes to Mining Asteroids, Technology Is Only the First Problem
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Foreign Policy takes a look at the future of mining the estimated "100,000 near-Earth objects—including asteroids and comets—in the neighborhood of our planet. Some of these NEOs, as they’re called, are small. Others are substantial and potentially packed full of water and various important minerals, such as nickel, cobalt, and iron. One day, advocates believe, those objects will be tapped by variations on the equipment used in the coal mines of Kentucky or in the diamond mines of Africa. And for immense gain: According to industry experts, the contents of a single asteroid could be worth trillions of dollars." But the technology to get us there is only the first step. Experts say "a multinational body might emerge" to manage rights to NEOs, as well as a body of law, including an international court.

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Obama Reflects on His Economic Record
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Not to be outdone by Jeffrey Goldberg's recent piece in The Atlantic about President Obama's foreign policy, the New York Times Magazine checks in with a longread on the president's economic legacy. In it, Obama is cognizant that the economic reality--73 straight months of growth--isn't matched by public perceptions. Some of that, he says, is due to a constant drumbeat from the right that "that denies any progress." But he also accepts some blame himself. “I mean, the truth of the matter is that if we had been able to more effectively communicate all the steps we had taken to the swing voter,” he said, “then we might have maintained a majority in the House or the Senate.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Reagan Families, Allies Lash Out at Will Ferrell
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Ronald Reagan's children and political allies took to the media and Twitter this week to chide funnyman Will Ferrell for his plans to play a dementia-addled Reagan in his second term in a new comedy entitled Reagan. In an open letter, Reagan's daughter Patti Davis tells Ferrell, who's also a producer on the movie, “Perhaps for your comedy you would like to visit some dementia facilities. I have—I didn’t find anything comedic there, and my hope would be that if you’re a decent human being, you wouldn’t either.” Michael Reagan, the president's son, tweeted, "What an Outrag....Alzheimers is not joke...It kills..You should be ashamed all of you." And former Rep. Joe Walsh called it an example of "Hollywood taking a shot at conservatives again."

Source:
PEAK CONFIDENCE
Clinton No Longer Running Primary Ads
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

In a sign that she’s ready to put a longer-than-ex­pec­ted primary battle be­hind her, former Sec­ret­ary of State Hil­lary Clin­ton (D) is no longer go­ing on the air in up­com­ing primary states. “Team Clin­ton hasn’t spent a single cent in … Cali­for­nia, In­di­ana, Ken­tucky, Ore­gon and West Vir­gin­ia, while” Sen. Bernie Sanders’ (I-VT) “cam­paign has spent a little more than $1 mil­lion in those same states.” Meanwhile, Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR), Sanders’ "lone back­er in the Sen­ate, said the can­did­ate should end his pres­id­en­tial cam­paign if he’s los­ing to Hil­lary Clin­ton after the primary sea­son con­cludes in June, break­ing sharply with the can­did­ate who is vow­ing to take his in­sur­gent bid to the party con­ven­tion in Phil­adelphia.”

Source:
CITIZENS UNITED PT. 2?
Movie Based on ‘Clinton Cash’ to Debut at Cannes
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

The team behind the bestselling "Clinton Cash"—author Peter Schweizer and Breitbart's Stephen Bannon—is turning the book into a movie that will have its U.S. premiere just before the Democratic National Convention this summer. The film will get its global debut "next month in Cannes, France, during the Cannes Film Festival. (The movie is not a part of the festival, but will be shown at a screening arranged for distributors)." Bloomberg has a trailer up, pointing out that it's "less Ken Burns than Jerry Bruckheimer, featuring blood-drenched money, radical madrassas, and ominous footage of the Clintons."

Source:
×