Grover Norquist Gives Thumbs Up to Pot Taxes

The antitax advocate tells National Journal that taxing marijuana does not violate his pledge.

A cannabis plant grows in the Amsterdam Cannabis College, a non profit charitable organisation that gives information on cannabis and hemp use on February 7, 2007 in Amsterdam, Netherlands.
National Journal
Add to Briefcase
Alex Seitz Wald
Oct. 24, 2013, 12:29 p.m.

Good news for Re­pub­lic­ans who want to leg­al­ize marijuana: Tax­ing pot is A-OK with Grover Nor­quist, the keep­er of the an­ti­tax pledge that hun­dreds of GOP law­makers have signed.

Last month, Nor­quist joined Reps. Earl Blumenauer, D-Ore., and Dana Rohra­bach­er, R-Cal­if., two of Con­gress’s most out­spoken drug-policy re­formers, to push a plan that would al­low marijuana-re­lated busi­nesses to write off their busi­ness ex­penses. The fed­er­al tax code con­siders state-ap­proved dis­pens­ar­ies drug traf­fick­ers, even in the 20-plus states that have med­ic­al marijuana or full leg­al­iz­a­tion. Nor­quist, Blumenauer, and Rohra­bach­er want to put an end to that.

But it raises a ques­tion: Would leg­al­iz­ing and tax­ing marijuana vi­ol­ate the pledge not to raise taxes?

After all, the Amer­ic­ans for Tax Re­form pledge states, “I will op­pose and vote against any and all ef­forts to in­crease taxes.” States that have already moved to leg­al­ize marijuana, such as Wash­ing­ton and Col­or­ado, plan to levy steep ex­cise taxes on the drug.

But Nor­quist tells Na­tion­al Journ­al that law­makers who signed the pledge and want to leg­al­ize and tax can­nabis are in the clear. “That’s not a tax in­crease. It’s leg­al­iz­ing an activ­ity and hav­ing the tra­di­tion­al tax ap­plied to it,” he says.

He com­pares leg­al­iz­a­tion to changes in al­co­hol reg­u­la­tion, as when a state leg­al­izes the sale of li­quor on Sundays or al­lows gro­cery stores to sell beer and wine where they pre­vi­ously couldn’t.

“When you leg­al­ize something and more people do more of it, and the gov­ern­ment gets more rev­en­ue be­cause there’s more of it … that’s not a tax in­crease,” he ex­plains. “The tax goes from 100 per­cent, mean­ing it’s il­leg­al, to whatever the tax is.”

At 25 per­cent on three levels of sales (on top of the state’s stand­ard sales tax of 8.75 per­cent), Wash­ing­ton’s marijuana tax is sig­ni­fic­antly high­er than its levy on al­co­hol, but it’s all the “same zone,” says Nor­quist.

A new Gal­lup Poll out this week found that a re­cord 58 per­cent of Amer­ic­ans fa­vor leg­al­iz­a­tion. The po­ten­tial budget­ary wind­fall has been enough to con­vince some liber­tari­an-lean­ing Re­pub­lic­ans like Rohra­bach­er to sup­port what has tra­di­tion­ally been a lib­er­al is­sue. If the ex­per­i­ments in Col­or­ado and Wash­ing­ton work out, ex­pect to see plenty of oth­er states fol­low­ing in their wake. And now, thanks to Nor­quist, there’s one less obstacle. 

×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login