Global Security Newswire Staff
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Global Security Newswire Staff
Oct. 25, 2013, 9:02 a.m.

What’s next on non­pro­lif­er­a­tion and in­ter­na­tion­al se­cur­ity, in Wash­ing­ton and around the globe.

— Oct. 27-31: People hail­ing from more than 100 coun­tries are ex­pec­ted to des­cend on Abu Dh­abi for the In­ter­na­tion­al Atom­ic En­ergy Agency’s con­fer­ence on the safety and se­cur­ity of ra­dio­act­ive sources. Sunday’s open­ing ses­sion will in­clude a talk by IAEA Deputy Dir­ect­or Gen­er­al Denis Flory, who heads the agency’s De­part­ment of Nuc­le­ar Safety and Se­cur­ity. “Ra­dio­act­ive sources are ex­tens­ively used for be­ne­fi­cial pur­poses around the world in med­ic­al, in­dus­tri­al, ag­ri­cul­tur­al, re­search and edu­ca­tion­al ap­plic­a­tions,” or­gan­izers say. “To avoid ac­ci­dents or ma­li­cious acts us­ing such sources, safety and se­cur­ity meas­ures must be ob­served throughout their li­fe­cycle — from the mo­ment they are man­u­fac­tured to their safe dis­pos­al.” Con­fer­ence par­ti­cipants will dis­cuss the cur­rent ver­sion of the Code of Con­duct on the Safety and Se­cur­ity of Ra­dio­act­ive Sources, which the IAEA Board of Gov­ernors and Gen­er­al Con­fer­ence ap­proved in 2003.

— Oct. 28: John Limbert, former U.S. deputy as­sist­ant sec­ret­ary of State for Ir­an, will talk at George Wash­ing­ton Uni­versity about — you guessed it — Ir­an. The dis­cus­sion on “New Lead­er­ship in Tehran: Time for Rap­proche­ment?” will ex­am­ine the po­ten­tial for a ma­jor change in U.S.-Ir­a­ni­an re­la­tions, and the ways to make it hap­pen. The con­fer­ence, at the uni­versity’s El­li­ott School of In­ter­na­tion­al Af­fairs, is in­ten­ded to build on mo­mentum cre­ated by the elec­tion of mod­er­ate Has­san Rouh­ani as Ir­a­ni­an pres­id­ent and sub­sequent thaw­ing of re­la­tions between the na­tion and West­ern powers. The event is sponsored by the Amer­ic­an Ir­a­ni­an Coun­cil and George Wash­ing­ton Uni­versity In­ter­na­tion­al Af­fairs So­ci­ety. Ad­di­tion­al speak­ers in­clude Shir­een Hunter, dir­ect­or of the Carne­gie En­dow­ment Pro­ject on re­form­ist Is­lam; Hooshan Amirah­madi, pres­id­ent of the Amer­ic­an Ir­a­ni­an Coun­cil; and Patrick Clawson, dir­ect­or of re­search at the Wash­ing­ton In­sti­tute on Near East Policy. 

— Oct. 28: Ir­an, West Coast-style. Across the United States, former Los Alam­os Na­tion­al Labor­at­ory head Siegfried Heck­er will speak at a Stan­ford Uni­versity Cen­ter for In­ter­na­tion­al Se­cur­ity and Co­oper­a­tion sem­in­ar that prom­ises a “com­par­at­ive look at Ir­an’s nuc­le­ar pro­gram.” Heck­er, now a Stan­ford pro­fess­or, has made Ir­an’s nuc­le­ar as­pir­a­tions a fo­cus of his re­search. Heck­er is an ex­pert in sun­dry re­lated areas as well, and re­cently penned a column for the Bul­let­in of the Atom­ic Sci­ent­ists on North Korea’s re­act­iv­a­tion of an old plutoni­um-pro­duc­tion re­act­or.

— Oct. 28: U.N. High Rep­res­ent­at­ive for Dis­arm­a­ment Af­fairs An­gela Kane will de­liv­er the key­note ad­dress at a lunch­eon on “Nuc­le­ar Weapons: Threats and Solu­tions” at the United Na­tions’ headquar­ters in New York. Thomas Gra­ham, co-chair of the Amer­ic­an Bar As­so­ci­ation’s In­ter­na­tion­al Law Sec­tion’s Task Force on Nuc­le­ar Non-pro­lif­er­a­tion, will serve as a re­spond­ent to Kane’s re­marks. The two top ex­perts on elim­in­at­ing weapons-of-mass-de­struc­tion are poised to high­light WMD-re­lated de­lib­er­a­tions in the U.N. sys­tem — in­clud­ing the Gen­er­al As­sembly, Se­cur­ity Coun­cil and treaty-based re­gimes such as the nuc­le­ar Non-Pro­lif­er­a­tion Treaty and the Chem­ic­al Weapons Con­ven­tion. Kane has been a ma­jor play­er in the U.N. in­vest­ig­a­tions in­to chem­ic­al-weapons use in Syr­ia. Gra­ham has been in­volved in ne­go­ti­at­ing most ma­jor arms-con­trol treat­ies to which the United States is a party.

— Oct. 28-29: Tech­nic­al ex­perts from Ir­an and six coun­tries are ex­pec­ted to meet in Europe to dis­cuss a po­ten­tial plan for de­fus­ing in­ter­na­tion­al ten­sions over Tehran’s nuc­le­ar pro­gram. The ex­pert-level talks, ex­pec­ted in either Vi­enna or Geneva, will come be­fore the next ma­jor meet­ing Ir­an is plan­ning to at­tend with seni­or dip­lo­mats from the five per­man­ent U.N. Se­cur­ity Coun­cil mem­ber na­tions and Ger­many. Be­fore these tech­nic­al talks, Ir­a­ni­an dip­lo­mats are ex­pec­ted to meet with In­ter­na­tion­al Atom­ic En­ergy Agency, which wants to in­vest­ig­ate signs the Middle East­ern na­tion once may have en­gaged in sci­entif­ic activ­it­ies rel­ev­ant to atom­ic-arms de­vel­op­ment.

— Oct. 29: Lead­ing nuc­le­ar-weapons honchos will testi­fy be­fore the House Armed Ser­vices Com­mit­tee dur­ing a hear­ing that pre­vi­ously was sched­uled for Oct. 10. Don­ald Cook, deputy ad­min­is­trat­or for de­fense pro­grams at the Na­tion­al Nuc­le­ar Se­cur­ity Ad­min­is­tra­tion, Madelyn Creedon, the as­sist­ant sec­ret­ary of De­fense for glob­al stra­tegic af­fairs, Paul Hom­mert, the dir­ect­or of San­dia Na­tion­al Labor­at­or­ies, and Air Force Gen. Robert Kehler, com­mand­er of U.S. Stra­tegic Com­mand, are slated to testi­fy. The hear­ing comes as law­makers are look­ing to the Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion to re­con­sider plans to up­grade cer­tain nuc­le­ar war­heads due to cost con­cerns.

— Oct. 29-31: The Nuc­le­ar Reg­u­lat­ory Com­mis­sion will hold meet­ings with the Fed­er­al Emer­gency Man­age­ment Agency to dis­cuss pre­lim­in­ary draft changes to the “Cri­ter­ia for Pre­par­a­tion and Eval­u­ation of Ra­di­olo­gic­al Emer­gency Re­sponse Plans and Pre­pared­ness in Sup­port of Nuc­le­ar Power Plants.” The Gov­ern­ment Ac­count­ab­il­ity Of­fice in March charged the nuc­le­ar com­mis­sion “needs to bet­ter un­der­stand likely pub­lic re­sponse to ra­di­olo­gic­al In­cid­ents” at nuc­le­ar-power plants.

— Oct. 30: George Wash­ing­ton Uni­versity’s El­li­ott School of In­ter­na­tion­al Af­fairs is plan­ning an­oth­er event, this time on U.S. nuc­le­ar en­ergy-policy and in­ter­agency ef­forts. Joyce Con­nery, the dir­ect­or of nuc­le­ar en­ergy policy at the Na­tion­al Se­cur­ity Coun­cil’s Of­fice of In­ter­na­tion­al Eco­nom­ics, will talk at the event sponsored by the Nuc­le­ar Policy Talks and In­sti­tute for Nuc­le­ar Ma­ter­i­als Man­age­ment. Or­gan­izers say: “The U.S. nuc­le­ar in­dustry faces chal­lenges do­mest­ic­ally, with low nat­ur­al gas prices, a post-Fukushi­ma reg­u­lat­ory en­vir­on­ment and tight cap­it­al. In­ter­na­tion­ally, the U.S. is no longer the only sup­pli­er of nuc­le­ar tech­no­logy and faces com­pet­i­tion from state-backed sup­pli­ers.” Con­nery is ex­pec­ted to dis­cuss “the role of the U.S. gov­ern­ment in sup­port­ing the U.S. nuc­le­ar in­dustry and how main­tain­ing a strong nuc­le­ar in­dustry en­hances U.S. na­tion­al in­terests to in­clude non­pro­lif­er­a­tion, se­cur­ity, safety, com­merce and prosper­ity,” they say.

What We're Following See More »
Senate Votes Down Repeal without Replace
2 hours ago
Trump to Donate $100,000 to Dept. of Education
2 hours ago
Scalise Released From Hospital
6 hours ago
Session to Annouce Leak Investigations
8 hours ago

The stand off between President Trump and A.G. Sessions is escalating. But Sessions is standing his ground and getting work done. "Officials said Sessions is due to announce in coming days a number of criminal leak investigations based on news accounts of sensitive intelligence information. And within hours of Trump’s public broadside, the Justice Department announced it would change a police funding program to add new requirements that cities help federal agents find undocumented immigrants to receive grants."

Russia Ready to Retaliate for New Sanctions
9 hours ago

"Russia threatened to retaliate against new sanctions passed by the U.S. House of Representatives, saying they made it all but impossible to achieve the Trump administration’s goal of improved relations." Konstantin Kosachyov, chairman of the international affairs committee in Russia’s upper house of parliament, said hope “is dying” for improved relations because the scale of “the anti-Russian consensus in Congress makes dialogue impossible and for a long time." The bill passed with only three "no" votes.


Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.