Would You Donate a Kidney for $10,000?

A program that pays people for their organs could help save lives and money. And it may work better than the current U.S. organ-transplant system.

National Journal
Marina Koren
Oct. 28, 2013, 9:38 a.m.

There are roughly 96,000 people on the trans­plant list for kid­neys in the United States. About 4,500 of them will die wait­ing for a match this year.

Kid­ney dis­ease is on the rise in the na­tion. For pa­tients near­ing kid­ney fail­ure, trans­plants are the best and of­ten only meth­ods of treat­ment. However, the rate of dona­tions, from both liv­ing and de­ceased donors, has re­mained re­l­at­ively un­changed in the last dec­ade.

So how can the U.S. meet the de­mand for donors? Give people a couple thou­sand dol­lars in ex­change for their kid­neys, sug­gests a study pub­lished last week in the Clin­ic­al Journ­al of the Amer­ic­an So­ci­ety of Neph­ro­logy, which fo­cuses on kid­ney-dis­ease re­search and pa­tient care.

The idea goes like this: Pay liv­ing kid­ney donors $10,000. The mon­et­ary in­cent­ive would then in­crease the num­ber of trans­plants by 5 per­cent, which the re­search­ers call a “very con­ser­vat­ive es­tim­ate.” More trans­plants would mean bet­ter pa­tient out­comes. And hos­pit­als and in­sur­ance com­pan­ies would save money on dia­lys­is and oth­er care for now-health­i­er pa­tients.

Last year, 16,812 kid­ney trans­plants were per­formed in the U.S. Of these, 5,769 came from liv­ing donors. A 5 per­cent in­crease, ap­plied to these fig­ures, would add about 288 kid­ney dona­tions a year.

In the study, the re­search­ers used av­er­age costs of dia­lys­is and sim­il­ar care, trans­plant­a­tion and sur­viv­al rates, and time spent on trans­plant lists to com­pare a pay­ment pro­gram with typ­ic­al or­gan-dona­tion sys­tems. Some of the fig­ures and data­bases were Ca­na­dian, but the re­search­ers say the res­ults hold for the U.S. A hy­po­thet­ic­al gov­ern­ment or third-party-ad­min­istered pro­gram that paid donors, they ar­gue, would be less costly and more ef­fect­ive than the cur­rent Amer­ic­an sys­tem, which is man­aged by UN­OS, a private, non­profit or­gan­iz­a­tion.

In the U.S., it is il­leg­al for “any per­son to know­ingly ac­quire, re­ceive, or oth­er­wise trans­fer any hu­man or­gan for valu­able con­sid­er­a­tion for use in hu­man trans­plant­a­tion,” un­der the Na­tion­al Or­gan Trans­plant Act. While liv­ing donors don’t get paid for their kid­neys, Medi­care or private health in­sur­ance does cov­er the pro­cess.

Pro­ponents of leg­al­iz­ing pay­ment for or­gans point to the gen­er­ally ac­cep­ted dona­tion of hair, blood, sperm, and eggs. While these have min­im­al med­ic­al risk for the donor, “it is ac­cep­ted that they are sold for fin­an­cial gain,” wrote sur­geon Amy Fried­man in a 2006 study in fa­vor of leg­al­iz­ing pay­ments for  liv­ing or­gan dona­tions. Many of these dona­tions come from eco­nom­ic­ally dis­ad­vant­aged pop­u­la­tions, and a hy­po­thet­ic­al pro­gram that ex­changes money for or­gans runs the same risk of ex­ploit­ing the most needy.

There have been at­tempts to at least some­what com­pensate liv­ing donors for their kid­neys. In 2002, a former Sens. Chris Dodd, D-Conn., and Bill Frist, R-Tenn., in­tro­duced le­gis­la­tion that would have provided re­im­burse­ment for travel ex­penses for liv­ing donors. In 2009, the Na­tion­al Kid­ney Found­a­tion, a New-York based non­profit, re­com­men­ded cov­er­ing fu­ner­al ex­penses for fam­il­ies who donate a re­l­at­ive’s or­gans. For some, however, even pick­ing up the tab for travel and fu­ner­al ex­penses is go­ing too far, near­ing bribery. “You’re edging to­wards fin­an­cial in­cent­ives rather than com­pens­a­tion,” one bioeth­i­cist told USA Today in 2009.

What We're Following See More »
CALIFORNIA VOTES IN A WEEK
Jerry Brown Backs Clinton
36 minutes ago
THE LATEST

California Gov. Jerry Brown endorsed Hillary Clinton today, calling her "the only path forward to win the presidency and stop the dangerous candidacy of Donald Trump." While praising Sen. Bernie Sanders' campaign, Brown said "Clinton’s lead is insurmountable and Democrats have shown – by millions of votes – that they want her as their nominee. ... This is no time for Democrats to keep fighting each other. The general election has already begun."

Source:
GLASS CEILING STILL HARD TO CRACK
Clinton Says Voters Still Hung Up on Gender
3 hours ago
THE LATEST

In a New York Magazine profile, Hillary Clinton said she still encounters misogyny at her own events: “‘I really admire you, I really like you, I just don’t know if I can vote for a woman to be president.’ I mean, they come to my events and then they say that to me.”

Source:
CHANGE WE CAN’T BELIEVE IN
Trump Vows Not to Change
4 hours ago
THE LATEST
Source:
FILING DEADLINE IS JUNE 24
McConnell Urging Rubio to Run for Reelection
6 hours ago
THE LATEST

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell: "One of the things that I’m hoping, I and my colleagues have been trying to convince Senator Marco Rubio to run again in Florida. He had indicated he was not going to, but we’re all hoping that he’ll reconsider, because poll data indicates that he is the one who can win for us. He would not only save a terrific senator for the Senate, but help save the majority. ... Well, I hope so. We’re all lobbying hard for him to run again."

Source:
LEAKER SHOULD STILL STAND TRIAL
Holder: Snowden Performed a Public Service
9 hours ago
THE LATEST

Former Attorney General Eric Holder said that NSA leaker Edward Snowden "actually performed a public service by raising the debate that we engaged in and by the changes that we made" by releasing information about government surveillance. Holder, a guest on David Axelrod's "Axe Files" podcast, also said Snowden endangered American interests and should face consequences for his actions. 

Source:
×