A bipartisan bill taking aim at the centerpiece of President Obama’s agenda on climate change probably has little chance of becoming law, but it gives the coal industry and its supporters a new rallying cry against impending Environmental Protection Agency regulations for power plants.
On Monday, House Energy and Power Subcommittee Chairman Ed Whitfield, R-Ky., and Sen. Joe Manchin, D-W.Va., introduced a discussion draft of legislation to significantly rein in EPA’s regulatory authority over greenhouse gases in the electricity sector.
The draft would block the agency’s proposed new source-performance standards for future power plants, released in September. It calls on future EPA rule-making for new coal-fired power plants to mandate already existing, commercially proven technology to limit greenhouse-gas emissions, and it would allow Congress to determine when regulations on existing plants take effect.
“We’re just using a practical, common-sense approach,” Whitfield said at a press briefing on the bill. “If an entity wants to [build a new coal-fired plant] and they can use the best available technology … then the EPA … should not be able to stop them from doing that.”
The release of the discussion draft comes ahead of a major push against the regulations on Tuesday, with a pro-coal rally set to take place on the West Lawn of the Capitol. The rally, organized by Count on Coal, a grassroots coal advocacy campaign, is expected to draw between 3,500 to 4,000 participants, many of them miners and utility workers concerned about the EPA regulations.
“There’s a real human impact here,” said Nancy Gravatt, a spokeswoman for the National Mining Association. “There are a lot of people who are very concerned about how extreme these regulations are and want to make their voices heard.”
Coal-state lawmakers from both parties are expected to attend, including Manchin and two fellow West Virginians — Democratic Rep. Nick Rahall and Republican Rep. Shelley Moore Capito — along with Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., and Sen. Heidi Heitkamp, D-N.D.
“I would be hopeful that [the administration] would listen and not just give us lip service,” Capito told National Journal Daily. “If all we’re doing is raising the level of discussion and shining a light on it and hoping to change things that way, I’ll take what I can get. Because I’m very frustrated that it’s been a deaf ear up to this point.”
Environmentalists began attacking the Whitfield-Manchin draft as soon as it became public Monday. “This would handcuff the EPA, preventing it from reducing carbon pollution that puts our children’s health at risk,” said David Hawkins, director of climate programs at the Natural Resources Defense Council. “It’s the latest attempt by radicals in Congress to gut the Clean Air Act’s ability to protect future generations from the dangers of climate change.”
What We're Following See More »
In a statement Friday, Sen. John McCain wrote, "I cannot in good conscience vote for the Graham-Cassidy proposal. I believe we could do better working together, Republicans and Democrats, and have not yet really tried. Nor could I support it without knowing how much it will cost, how it will effect insurance premiums, and how many people will be helped or hurt by it. Without a full CBO score, which won't be available by the end of the month, we won't have reliable answers to any of those questions." His "no" vote makes it much less likely Republicans will repeal and replace Obamacare by Sept. 30.
As anticipated, the Department of Education today withdrew the controversial Obama-era "Dear Colleague" letter on campus sexual assault, replacing it with new interim guidance. Most notably, the new guidance permits colleges to use a “clear and convincing” standard of evidence, rather than the preponderance of evidence standard that the 2011 letter seemed to mandate. "The new guidance also states that colleges may facilitate informal resolutions, including mediation, if all parties agree to participate in that process."
"The Trump administration will unveil more tailored restrictions on travelers from certain countries as a replacement to the controversial travel ban, according to a senior administration official. The new restrictions will vary by country. They could include a ban on travel to the United States, or new restrictions on obtaining a visa for citizens of particular countries." They are expected to be unveiled by Sunday.
In a live-streamed address from Silicon Valley, Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg announced a nine-point plan that the tech giant is rolling out over coming months to respond to "efforts by nation-states and private actors to use the social media platform to influence U.S. elections." Most importantly, the company will force all advertisers to disclose what ads they're running to all audiences. “When someone buys political ads on TV or other media, they’re required by law to disclose who paid for them,” Zuckerberg said. “But you still don’t know if you’re seeing the same messages as everyone else. So we’re going to bring Facebook to an even higher standard of transparency. Not only will you have to disclose which page paid for an ad, but we will also make it so you can visit an advertiser’s page and see the ads they’re currently running to any audience on Facebook.”
As "part of a broader Trump administration order for anti-leaks training at all executive branch agencies," Environmental Protection Agency employees "are attending mandatory training sessions this week to reinforce their compliance with laws and rules against leaking classified or sensitive government information ... Relatively few EPA employees deal with classified files, but the new training also reinforces requirements to keep 'Controlled Unclassified Information' from unauthorized disclosure."