Obama Takes ‘War on Coal’ Global

The Treasury Department said Tuesday it is taking steps to cut U.S. support for coal-fired power plants worldwide in a move to combat global warming.

A German coal-fired power plant. 
National Journal
Coral Davenport
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Coral Davenport
Oct. 29, 2013, 11:40 a.m.

The Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion, after wield­ing its ex­ec­ut­ive muscle to fight cli­mate-change pol­lu­tion from U.S. coal plants, is now us­ing its in­flu­ence to block new coal-fired power plants world­wide.

In Septem­ber, the En­vir­on­ment­al Pro­tec­tion Agency an­nounced draft rules to slash pol­lu­tion from new U.S. coal-fired power plants — a move that, once fi­nal­ized, is ex­pec­ted to freeze con­struc­tion of U.S. coal plants, the chief con­trib­ut­or to car­bon pol­lu­tion. On Tues­day, the Treas­ury De­part­ment de­tailed its plans for end­ing U.S. sup­port for pub­lic fin­an­cing of con­struc­tion of new coal-fired power plants abroad, ex­cept un­der very lim­ited cir­cum­stances.

The move comes as one of a series ag­gress­ive ex­ec­ut­ive-branch ac­tions be­ing pushed by Pres­id­ent Obama as he seeks to fight cli­mate change without help from Con­gress. For years, Re­pub­lic­ans and the coal in­dustry have dubbed EPA reg­u­la­tion a “War on Coal” — and thou­sands of pro­test­ers ral­lied at the Cap­it­ol wav­ing “War on Coal” signs Tues­day just as a seni­or Treas­ury De­part­ment of­fi­cial was brief­ing re­port­ers on the ad­min­is­tra­tion’s plan to take the fight against coal from Wash­ing­ton to the world.

The of­fi­cial made clear that it’s the Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion’s in­tent to use every tool in its ar­sen­al — both ex­ec­ut­ive au­thor­ity and its glob­al in­flu­ence — to push en­ergy com­pan­ies and in­vestors away from coal and to­ward more cli­mate-friendly fuel sources, in­clud­ing sol­ar and wind, but also nat­ur­al gas, which emits about half the car­bon pol­lu­tion of coal.

The U.S., which holds more votes than any oth­er coun­try in ap­prov­ing pro­jects fin­anced by the World Bank and oth­er glob­al fin­an­cial in­sti­tu­tions, can con­sist­ently vote against pub­lic fin­an­cing for any new coal pro­ject. While the U.S. alone can’t veto the pro­jects, with sup­port from a few like-minded gov­ern­ments, it can. And the World Bank, which has also re­cently re­ori­ented it­self to­ward fight­ing cli­mate change glob­ally, is ex­pec­ted to be a will­ing part­ner in help­ing the U.S. achieve that goal.

Al­though the new move will only lim­it pub­lic fin­an­cing for coal pro­jects — which is a small slice of glob­al en­ergy in­vest­ment — the Treas­ury of­fi­cial said the U.S. hopes the move will send a strong mes­sage to private in­vestors about the vi­ab­il­ity of fin­an­cing coal pro­jects any­where in the world.

“We be­lieve that if pub­lic fin­an­cing points the way, it will then fa­cil­it­ate private in­vest­ment,” said Lael Brainard, Treas­ury’s un­der­sec­ret­ary for in­ter­na­tion­al af­fairs.

The of­fi­cial said that Treas­ury will use its in­flu­ence on pub­lic-fin­an­cing pro­jects to push de­vel­op­ment banks and key play­ers in pub­lic in­vest­ment in the dir­ec­tion of clean­er sources of en­ergy. The hope, said the of­fi­cial, is to cre­ate a broad­er ripple ef­fect — that when private in­vestors see gov­ern­ments end­ing fin­an­cial back­ing in coal, they’ll also be scared away.

The Treas­ury De­part­ment’s coal-plant guidelines are modeled after last month’s EPA rules. Those rules re­quire that new coal plants built in the U.S. lim­it their emis­sions to less than 1,100 pounds of car­bon pol­lu­tion per mega­watt-hour — slightly more than half the car­bon pol­lu­tion now pro­duced by a typ­ic­al coal-powered plant. The only way a coal plant own­er could meet those re­quire­ments would be by in­stalling ex­pens­ive “car­bon cap­ture and se­quest­ra­tion” tech­no­logy. While the tech­no­logy, which traps car­bon pol­lu­tion and in­jects it un­der­ground be­fore it spews out of smokestacks, is com­mer­cially avail­able, it could cost power com­pan­ies bil­lions of dol­lars to in­stall. In­stead, it’s ex­pec­ted that power com­pan­ies will simply in­vest in gen­er­at­ing elec­tri­city from oth­er, less-pol­lut­ing forms of elec­tri­city, chiefly nat­ur­al gas, which emits just half the car­bon pol­lu­tion of coal, but also wind, sol­ar, and nuc­le­ar en­ergy.

What We're Following See More »
“HOLY HELL TO PAY” IF TRUMP FIRES A.G.
Sen. Graham Supporting Sessions
7 hours ago
THE LATEST

"Sen. Lindsay Graham said he is '100 percent behind' embattled Attorney General Jeff Sessions, and said there would be 'holy hell to pay' if President Donald Trump fires him. Graham also said that if the president went after special prosecutor Robert Mueller, who’s directing the investigation into possible contacts between Trump’s circle and Russia, that could be the 'beginning of the end of the Trump presidency, unless Mueller did something wrong.'"

Source:
AMiDST COMMS STAFF SHAKEUP
Sanders New WH Press Secretary
8 hours ago
THE LATEST

"With little pomp or circumstance, Sarah Huckabee Sanders stepped up to the briefing room podium and got straight to business Friday, reading announcements about "Made in America Week" and a new executive order on defense. Minutes later, newly minted communications director Anthony Scaramucci announced she was formally taking over as White House press secretary. In the aftermath of a chaotic communications staff shakeup at the White House last week, there was little attention paid to a new milestone as Sanders assumed the role."

Source:
JOINT CHIEFS TO KEEP POLICY UNTIL GIVEN DIRECTIONS
No Instructions to Pentagon, No Change in Transgender Policy
9 hours ago
THE DETAILS

"The highest ranking military officer in the country said that the military’s transgender policy won’t actively change until President Trump sends specific directions to the Pentagon. 'There will be no modifications to the current policy until the president’s direction has been received by the secretary of defense and the secretary has issued implementation guidance,' Joint Chiefs Chairman Gen. Joseph Dunford wrote in a letter."

Source:
TO INVICTUS GAMES IN CANADA
FLOTUS First Trip Solo
9 hours ago
THE LATEST
SCARAMUCCI INSINUATED PRIEBUS LEAKED INFO
Two of Trump’s Top Advisors Feuding
10 hours ago
THE LATEST

"A long-simmering feud between two of President Trump’s top advisers reached a boiling point Thursday, as White House communications director Anthony Scaramucci publicly insinuated that chief of staff Reince Priebus is a leaker."

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login