Obama Takes ‘War on Coal’ Global

The Treasury Department said Tuesday it is taking steps to cut U.S. support for coal-fired power plants worldwide in a move to combat global warming.

A German coal-fired power plant. 
National Journal
Coral Davenport
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Coral Davenport
Oct. 29, 2013, 11:40 a.m.

The Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion, after wield­ing its ex­ec­ut­ive muscle to fight cli­mate-change pol­lu­tion from U.S. coal plants, is now us­ing its in­flu­ence to block new coal-fired power plants world­wide.

In Septem­ber, the En­vir­on­ment­al Pro­tec­tion Agency an­nounced draft rules to slash pol­lu­tion from new U.S. coal-fired power plants — a move that, once fi­nal­ized, is ex­pec­ted to freeze con­struc­tion of U.S. coal plants, the chief con­trib­ut­or to car­bon pol­lu­tion. On Tues­day, the Treas­ury De­part­ment de­tailed its plans for end­ing U.S. sup­port for pub­lic fin­an­cing of con­struc­tion of new coal-fired power plants abroad, ex­cept un­der very lim­ited cir­cum­stances.

The move comes as one of a series ag­gress­ive ex­ec­ut­ive-branch ac­tions be­ing pushed by Pres­id­ent Obama as he seeks to fight cli­mate change without help from Con­gress. For years, Re­pub­lic­ans and the coal in­dustry have dubbed EPA reg­u­la­tion a “War on Coal” — and thou­sands of pro­test­ers ral­lied at the Cap­it­ol wav­ing “War on Coal” signs Tues­day just as a seni­or Treas­ury De­part­ment of­fi­cial was brief­ing re­port­ers on the ad­min­is­tra­tion’s plan to take the fight against coal from Wash­ing­ton to the world.

The of­fi­cial made clear that it’s the Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion’s in­tent to use every tool in its ar­sen­al — both ex­ec­ut­ive au­thor­ity and its glob­al in­flu­ence — to push en­ergy com­pan­ies and in­vestors away from coal and to­ward more cli­mate-friendly fuel sources, in­clud­ing sol­ar and wind, but also nat­ur­al gas, which emits about half the car­bon pol­lu­tion of coal.

The U.S., which holds more votes than any oth­er coun­try in ap­prov­ing pro­jects fin­anced by the World Bank and oth­er glob­al fin­an­cial in­sti­tu­tions, can con­sist­ently vote against pub­lic fin­an­cing for any new coal pro­ject. While the U.S. alone can’t veto the pro­jects, with sup­port from a few like-minded gov­ern­ments, it can. And the World Bank, which has also re­cently re­ori­ented it­self to­ward fight­ing cli­mate change glob­ally, is ex­pec­ted to be a will­ing part­ner in help­ing the U.S. achieve that goal.

Al­though the new move will only lim­it pub­lic fin­an­cing for coal pro­jects — which is a small slice of glob­al en­ergy in­vest­ment — the Treas­ury of­fi­cial said the U.S. hopes the move will send a strong mes­sage to private in­vestors about the vi­ab­il­ity of fin­an­cing coal pro­jects any­where in the world.

“We be­lieve that if pub­lic fin­an­cing points the way, it will then fa­cil­it­ate private in­vest­ment,” said Lael Brainard, Treas­ury’s un­der­sec­ret­ary for in­ter­na­tion­al af­fairs.

The of­fi­cial said that Treas­ury will use its in­flu­ence on pub­lic-fin­an­cing pro­jects to push de­vel­op­ment banks and key play­ers in pub­lic in­vest­ment in the dir­ec­tion of clean­er sources of en­ergy. The hope, said the of­fi­cial, is to cre­ate a broad­er ripple ef­fect — that when private in­vestors see gov­ern­ments end­ing fin­an­cial back­ing in coal, they’ll also be scared away.

The Treas­ury De­part­ment’s coal-plant guidelines are modeled after last month’s EPA rules. Those rules re­quire that new coal plants built in the U.S. lim­it their emis­sions to less than 1,100 pounds of car­bon pol­lu­tion per mega­watt-hour — slightly more than half the car­bon pol­lu­tion now pro­duced by a typ­ic­al coal-powered plant. The only way a coal plant own­er could meet those re­quire­ments would be by in­stalling ex­pens­ive “car­bon cap­ture and se­quest­ra­tion” tech­no­logy. While the tech­no­logy, which traps car­bon pol­lu­tion and in­jects it un­der­ground be­fore it spews out of smokestacks, is com­mer­cially avail­able, it could cost power com­pan­ies bil­lions of dol­lars to in­stall. In­stead, it’s ex­pec­ted that power com­pan­ies will simply in­vest in gen­er­at­ing elec­tri­city from oth­er, less-pol­lut­ing forms of elec­tri­city, chiefly nat­ur­al gas, which emits just half the car­bon pol­lu­tion of coal, but also wind, sol­ar, and nuc­le­ar en­ergy.

What We're Following See More »
TRUMP TOWER MEETING
Statehood, Metro Come Up as Bowser Meets Trump
2 minutes ago
THE LATEST

DC Mayor Muriel Bowser met with Donald Trump this morning in Manhattan, with statehood and the Metro system on the agenda. “We talked about the things that are important to Washingtonians, and certainly becoming the 51st state is one of them," she said after the meeting. She also made the point that the District is “not dependent on the federal government for our funds," and brought up funding for Metro. She told reporters that Trump is a fan of D.C.

Source:
EVENT IN NC
Mattis Gets the Official Nod Tonight
1 hours ago
WHY WE CARE
LOWER COURT TO DETERMINE NEW DAMAGES
SCOTUS Sides with Samsung Over Apple
1 hours ago
THE LATEST

"A unanimous Supreme Court on Tuesday sided with smartphone maker Samsung in its high-profile patent dispute with Apple over design of the iPhone. The justices said Samsung may not be required to pay all the profits it earned from 11 phone models because the features at issue are only a tiny part of the devices. Apple had won a $399 million judgment against Samsung for copying parts of the iPhone's patented design, but the case now returns to a lower court to decide what Samsung must pay."

Source:
AFRAID OF BUDGET CUTS
Pentagon Hid Evidence of Waste
2 hours ago
THE DETAILS

"The Pentagon has buried an internal study that exposed $125 billion in administrative waste in its business operations amid fears Congress would use the findings as an excuse to slash the defense budget, according to interviews and confidential memos obtained by The Washington Post."

Source:
TRUMP IS “NOT QUALIFIED FOR THE OFFICE”
Texas GOP Elector Won’t Cast Vote For Trump
2 hours ago
THE LATEST

Christopher Suprun, a GOP elector from Texas, announced in an op-ed for The New York Times that he will not cast his vote in the electoral college for Donald Trump. This one vote will not keep Trump from getting to the 270 necessary to secure an electoral victory, but stands as a strong statement of rebuke. "I am asked to cast a vote on Dec. 19 for someone who shows daily he is not qualified for the office," Suprun wrote.

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login