Four Questions for Sebelius About HealthCare.gov

WASHINGTON, DC - FEBRUARY 04: U.S. Secretary of Health and Human Services Kathleen Sebelius speaks during the opening plenary of the National Health Policy Conference organized by The AcademyHealth February 4, 2013 in Washington, DC. Sebelius spoke on the Obama Administration's health policy priorities.  
National Journal
Sam Baker
Oct. 29, 2013, 4 p.m.

House Re­pub­lic­ans will set their sights Wed­nes­day on Health and Hu­man Ser­vices Sec­ret­ary Kath­leen Se­beli­us, who is sched­uled to testi­fy for the first time since the messy launch of Health­Care.gov.

The site’s well-doc­u­mented tech­nic­al prob­lems have caused fresh polit­ic­al head­aches for the White House and Demo­crat­ic in­cum­bents fa­cing tough races next year. The flaws are also hav­ing a sub­stant­ive ef­fect — keep­ing people from sign­ing up for health care plans that the White House has been pro­mot­ing for years.

Se­beli­us’s pre­pared testi­mony ac­know­ledges that the site’s rol­lout has been “frus­trat­ing” for con­sumers, but doesn’t con­cede any mis­takes by HHS. It puts the blame on the con­tract­ors who built the site — not on HHS or the Cen­ters for Medi­care and Medi­caid Ser­vices, the HHS agency that dir­ectly over­sees Obama­care im­ple­ment­a­tion.

That likely won’t sit well with Re­pub­lic­ans on the En­ergy and Com­merce Com­mit­tee, who are hop­ing to use the tech­nic­al prob­lems as part of a broad­er case against the fed­er­al gov­ern­ment — not against gov­ern­ment con­tract­ors.

Here are four ques­tions for Se­beli­us — ques­tions she’s either likely to face, or that would help shed light on what really went wrong with Health­Care.gov:

If HHS didn’t make mis­takes, are you fix­ing prob­lems that don’t ex­ist?

Health­Care.gov’s con­tract­ors faul­ted CMS last week for put­ting it­self in charge of in­teg­rat­ing the sys­tems built by vari­ous private com­pan­ies, rather than put­ting one of them in charge of pulling everything to­geth­er. They said the in­di­vidu­al pieces worked fine; the sys­tem broke down once CMS in­teg­rated it all and tested it from front to back.

Se­beli­us’s pre­pared testi­mony dir­ectly chal­lenges that charge, put­ting the blame back on the con­tract­ors.

“CMS has a track re­cord of suc­cess­fully over­see­ing the many con­tract­ors our pro­grams de­pend on to func­tion. Un­for­tu­nately, a sub­set of those con­tracts for Health­Care.gov have not met ex­pect­a­tions,” Se­beli­us’s testi­mony says.

But here’s the thing: The way the White House has re­spon­ded to the site’s ini­tial fail­ure seems to sug­gest that over­sight was in­deed lack­ing. The ad­min­is­tra­tion brought in former White House budget dir­ect­or Jef­frey Zi­ents, who has a back­ground in man­age­ment con­sult­ing, to quar­ter­back the re­pair ef­fort. And Zi­ents des­ig­nated one con­tract­or to take the lead in co­ordin­at­ing every­one’s fixes.

So if, as Se­beli­us says, the prob­lem wasn’t with CMS’s man­age­ment of the site, why have the most vis­ible changes so far dealt with man­age­ment and over­sight?

When did you find out the site failed cer­tain tests, and what did you do about it?

Se­beli­us’s deputy, CMS Ad­min­is­trat­or Mar­ilyn Taven­ner, said Tues­day that she wasn’t pre­pared for the mag­nitude of prob­lems the site ex­per­i­enced once it launched — even though the con­tract­ors said they no­ti­fied their con­tacts at CMS that late-stage test­ing wasn’t look­ing good.

So did seni­or HHS of­fi­cials not know that the site was per­form­ing poorly in tests right be­fore its launch? If not, why not? Isn’t that ex­actly the kind of thing Se­beli­us should have been on top of?

Or did they know big prob­lems were com­ing and simply sug­ar­coated their ex­pect­a­tions for law­makers and the press? If that’s the case, why did HHS keep telling Con­gress and the pub­lic it would be ready on time? Was there any dis­cus­sion of a delay? Any be­hind-the-scenes con­sequences for the fail­ure to launch?

Neither scen­ario looks great for the ad­min­is­tra­tion, but it’s a key ques­tion in tra­cing ac­count­ab­il­ity for the web­site’s fail­ures.

Re­port­ers have been shut down without so much as an evas­ive non­answer when they’ve asked when Se­beli­us knew about the site’s prob­lems. Maybe En­ergy and Com­merce will have bet­ter luck.

Why are in­sur­ance com­pan­ies get­ting in­ac­cur­ate data?

CMS said Tues­day that it has made strong pro­gress on the most glar­ing prob­lem with Health­Care.gov — the pro­cess for cre­at­ing an ac­count. Also on the top of Zi­ents’s “punch list” for re­pairs, though, are ser­i­ous prob­lems with the data the site is feed­ing to in­sur­ance com­pan­ies. In­surers are get­ting du­plic­ate re­cords, in­ac­cur­ate re­cords, and en­roll­ments fol­lowed by can­cel­la­tions.

Se­beli­us’s testi­mony re­it­er­ates the ad­min­is­tra­tion’s ex­plan­a­tion that heavy traffic con­trib­uted to Health­Care.gov’s prob­lems. But traffic al­most surely didn’t cause the back-end prob­lems with in­surers, and fix­ing those is­sues is crit­ic­al to suc­cess­ful en­roll­ment.

Are you sure you know the ex­tent of the prob­lems?

Zi­ents and CMS haven’t re­leased their full “punch list,” but they’ve said they’re con­fid­ent the site will be ready by the end of Novem­ber. Es­pe­cially giv­en the prob­lems on the back end, can HHS say for sure that its dia­gnos­is has been com­plete, and that oth­er prob­lems won’t emerge and side­line the pro­cess be­fore it’s fin­ished?

{{ BIZOBJ (video: 4532) }}

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
When It Comes to Mining Asteroids, Technology Is Only the First Problem
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Foreign Policy takes a look at the future of mining the estimated "100,000 near-Earth objects—including asteroids and comets—in the neighborhood of our planet. Some of these NEOs, as they’re called, are small. Others are substantial and potentially packed full of water and various important minerals, such as nickel, cobalt, and iron. One day, advocates believe, those objects will be tapped by variations on the equipment used in the coal mines of Kentucky or in the diamond mines of Africa. And for immense gain: According to industry experts, the contents of a single asteroid could be worth trillions of dollars." But the technology to get us there is only the first step. Experts say "a multinational body might emerge" to manage rights to NEOs, as well as a body of law, including an international court.

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Obama Reflects on His Economic Record
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Not to be outdone by Jeffrey Goldberg's recent piece in The Atlantic about President Obama's foreign policy, the New York Times Magazine checks in with a longread on the president's economic legacy. In it, Obama is cognizant that the economic reality--73 straight months of growth--isn't matched by public perceptions. Some of that, he says, is due to a constant drumbeat from the right that "that denies any progress." But he also accepts some blame himself. “I mean, the truth of the matter is that if we had been able to more effectively communicate all the steps we had taken to the swing voter,” he said, “then we might have maintained a majority in the House or the Senate.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Reagan Families, Allies Lash Out at Will Ferrell
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Ronald Reagan's children and political allies took to the media and Twitter this week to chide funnyman Will Ferrell for his plans to play a dementia-addled Reagan in his second term in a new comedy entitled Reagan. In an open letter, Reagan's daughter Patti Davis tells Ferrell, who's also a producer on the movie, “Perhaps for your comedy you would like to visit some dementia facilities. I have—I didn’t find anything comedic there, and my hope would be that if you’re a decent human being, you wouldn’t either.” Michael Reagan, the president's son, tweeted, "What an Outrag....Alzheimers is not joke...It kills..You should be ashamed all of you." And former Rep. Joe Walsh called it an example of "Hollywood taking a shot at conservatives again."

Source:
PEAK CONFIDENCE
Clinton No Longer Running Primary Ads
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

In a sign that she’s ready to put a longer-than-ex­pec­ted primary battle be­hind her, former Sec­ret­ary of State Hil­lary Clin­ton (D) is no longer go­ing on the air in up­com­ing primary states. “Team Clin­ton hasn’t spent a single cent in … Cali­for­nia, In­di­ana, Ken­tucky, Ore­gon and West Vir­gin­ia, while” Sen. Bernie Sanders’ (I-VT) “cam­paign has spent a little more than $1 mil­lion in those same states.” Meanwhile, Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR), Sanders’ "lone back­er in the Sen­ate, said the can­did­ate should end his pres­id­en­tial cam­paign if he’s los­ing to Hil­lary Clin­ton after the primary sea­son con­cludes in June, break­ing sharply with the can­did­ate who is vow­ing to take his in­sur­gent bid to the party con­ven­tion in Phil­adelphia.”

Source:
CITIZENS UNITED PT. 2?
Movie Based on ‘Clinton Cash’ to Debut at Cannes
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

The team behind the bestselling "Clinton Cash"—author Peter Schweizer and Breitbart's Stephen Bannon—is turning the book into a movie that will have its U.S. premiere just before the Democratic National Convention this summer. The film will get its global debut "next month in Cannes, France, during the Cannes Film Festival. (The movie is not a part of the festival, but will be shown at a screening arranged for distributors)." Bloomberg has a trailer up, pointing out that it's "less Ken Burns than Jerry Bruckheimer, featuring blood-drenched money, radical madrassas, and ominous footage of the Clintons."

Source:
×