Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius misrepresented part of the Affordable Care Act on Wednesday as she testified before a House committee.
Sebelius told lawmakers it would be “illegal” for her to sign up for coverage through the law’s insurance marketplaces because she receives health benefits through her job.
“If I have affordable coverage in my workplace, I’m not eligible to go into the marketplace. That’s part of the law,” she said.
But people who have employer-based coverage are, in fact, allowed to decline that coverage and shop through the exchanges. They simply can’t receive tax subsidies to help cover the cost of their premiums, said Tim Jost, a law professor at Washington & Lee University.
Sebelius herself might still be ineligible for the exchanges because she’s on Medicare ““ but that’s not the reason she gave at Wednesday’s hearing.
The question of which political officials will go into the exchanges is a charged one that often misses the point of Obamacare. The law was primarily designed to serve the individual market ““ people who don’t get insurance through their job and buy it on their own, instead.
Sebelius noted that she has health insurance through her job ““ the same coverage available to all federal employees who have health care benefits, including members of Congress. And the federal government, like almost all large employers, covers a significant part of its employees’ premiums.
Members of Congress and their staffs must purchase coverage through the exchanges, but the federal government can still cover its normal share of their premiums.
By asking Sebelius to buy coverage through the exchanges, Republicans would be asking her to pay her entire premium on her own, despite having access to a traditional employer-based policy.
What We're Following See More »
The Commission on Presidential Debates put out a statement today that gives credence to Donald Trump's claims that he had a bad microphone on Monday night. "Regarding the first debate, there were issues regarding Donald Trump's audio that affected the sound level in the debate hall," read the statement in its entirety.
"A video of Donald Trump testifying under oath about his provocative rhetoric about Mexicans and other Latinos is set to go public" as soon as today. "Trump gave the testimony in June at a law office in Washington in connection with one of two lawsuits he filed last year after prominent chefs reacted to the controversy over his remarks by pulling out of plans to open restaurants at his new D.C. hotel. D.C. Superior Court Judge Brian Holeman said in an order issued Thursday evening that fears the testimony might show up in campaign commercials were no basis to keep the public from seeing the video."
No matter that his recall of foreign leaders leaves something to be desired, Gary Johnson is the choice of the Chicago Tribune's editorial board. The editors argue that Donald Trump couldn't do the job of president, while hitting Hillary Clinton for "her intent to greatly increase federal spending and taxation, and serious questions about honesty and trust." Which leaves them with Johnson. "Every American who casts a vote for him is standing for principles," they write, "and can be proud of that vote. Yes, proud of a candidate in 2016."
"By all means vote, just not for Donald Trump." That's the message from USA Today editors, who are making the first recommendation on a presidential race in the paper's 34-year history. It's not exactly an endorsement; they make clear that the editorial board "does not have a consensus for a Clinton endorsement." But they state flatly that Donald Trump is, by "unanimous consensus of the editorial board, unfit for the presidency."