Political Connections

2020 Dems Face "Lock Him Up" Quandary

How will White House contenders react if their audiences demand jail for President Trump?

AP Photo/Jacquelyn Martin
Dec. 12, 2018, 8 p.m.

One of the early choices every 2020 Democratic presidential contender will face is how to react the first time the audience at one of their events breaks into the chant, “Lock him up.”

That day likely isn’t far away, now that prosecutors from the Southern District of New York, in Donald Trump’s own Justice Department, have formally implicated the president in two violations of campaign finance law by Michael Cohen, his former attorney and fixer, who was sentenced to three years in jail on Wednesday.

Those allegations against Trump could add an extraordinary element of volatility to an election that already looks poised to produce astronomical levels of voter turnout and polarization. The charges mean that along with all of the other combustible issues surrounding Trump’s presidency, another stark question could now be on the ballot: Does Trump face the risk of prosecution after he leaves the White House for actions he took to win the presidency?

Two factors are converging to ignite that debate. The first is the legal threat against Trump. In court documents last week, Cohen acknowledged his role in a 2016 plan to silence Stormy Daniels and Karen McDougal through undisclosed payments that amounted to illegal campaign contributions. In those actions, prosecutors wrote, Cohen “acted in coordination with and at the direction of” what the documents called “Individual-1,” meaning Trump. Compounding Trump’s jeopardy, on Wednesday the publisher of the National Enquirer acknowledged it paid off McDougal in coordination with Trump’s campaign.

Even with these admissions, convicting Trump wouldn’t be simple, experts note: The Justice Department lost a similar case against Democrat John Edwards when it charged him with hiding payments to his mistress in the 2008 campaign.

But with the evidence prosecutors have already collected, it is likely they would indict anyone else in Trump’s position, says University of California, Irvine law professor Richard Hasen. “On these set of facts I would not be surprised to see an indictment,” Hasen says, “if he were not the president.”

That qualification creates the second condition for the 2020 storm. The Southern District prosecutors are unlikely to challenge the Justice Department’s previous determinations that a sitting president can’t be indicted. That means Trump could not be prosecuted until he leaves office. Since the statute of limitations on the campaign finance violations expires in 2021, voters likely will go to the polls in 2020 knowing that if Trump is defeated he could face trial and conceivably (though less likely) jail time.

Republicans, characteristically, have already signaled they will shrug off the campaign finance allegations against Trump. In 2018, the GOP was swept from its House majority in part because voters felt they would not constrain or limit Trump. Yet Republicans have universally dismissed these new charges against the president. In the process, they have again provided Democrats a resonant symbol that a Republican Congress will not impose any accountability on Trump.

Democrats face more nuanced decisions. Democratic audiences are sure to press the 2020 candidates to indicate whether they would prosecute Trump if they beat him. It won’t be too long until a crowd in Iowa or New Hampshire flips the gender in Trump’s derisive chant about Hillary Clinton: “Lock her up.”

At that point, Democrats will face a choice that could provide one of the campaign’s first defining moments. Do they suppress the chant? Join in? Find a middle ground? One top strategist for a potential top-tier Democratic candidate, who asked not to be identified to discuss internal strategy, said in such a crowded field it’s inevitable some candidates will target the progressive base by promising to pursue Trump. “Someone looking for attention is going to set a bar on this,” the strategist said.

But Neil Sroka, communications director for the grassroots liberal group Democracy for America, predicts that progressives won’t pressure Democrats to echo Trump’s belligerent threats against Clinton (which have continued in office). “I could see a really powerful moment … when a chant of ‘lock him up’ emerges from the audience, a candidate stepping back and saying, ‘No, this is what makes us different from the other side,’” Sroka said.

Instead, he said, grassroots liberals will push the candidates to promise a full investigation of all the legal questions surrounding Trump, but not demand a preemptive pledge to prosecute him. Barack Obama essentially struck that balance in 2008 when he faced demands during the Democratic primaries to investigate the use of torture against suspected terrorists under President George W. Bush.

Ultimately, Obama’s Justice Department, after several investigations, did not prosecute anyone over Bush’s brutal interrogation policies. That decision reflected the long-standing reluctance in both parties to escalate political disputes into courtroom trials. Trump, who has shredded so many other political norms, has to hope that one survives if voters unseat him two years from now.

What We're Following See More »
AVOIDS SHUTDOWN WITH A FEW HOURS TO SPARE
Trump Signs Border Deal
2 days ago
THE LATEST

"President Trump signed a sweeping spending bill Friday afternoon, averting another partial government shutdown. The action came after Trump had declared a national emergency in a move designed to circumvent Congress and build additional barriers at the southern border, where he said the United States faces 'an invasion of our country.'"

Source:
REDIRECTS $8 BILLION
Trump Declares National Emergency
3 days ago
THE DETAILS

"President Donald Trump on Friday declared a state of emergency on the southern border and immediately direct $8 billion to construct or repair as many as 234 miles of a border barrier. The move — which is sure to invite vigorous legal challenges from activists and government officials — comes after Trump failed to get the $5.7 billion he was seeking from lawmakers. Instead, Trump agreed to sign a deal that included just $1.375 for border security."

Source:
COULD SOW DIVISION AMONG REPUBLICANS
House Will Condemn Emergency Declaration
3 days ago
THE DETAILS

"House Democrats are gearing up to pass a joint resolution disapproving of President Trump’s emergency declaration to build his U.S.-Mexico border wall, a move that will force Senate Republicans to vote on a contentious issue that divides their party. House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerrold Nadler (D-N.Y.) said Thursday evening in an interview with The Washington Post that the House would take up the resolution in the coming days or weeks. The measure is expected to easily clear the Democratic-led House, and because it would be privileged, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) would be forced to put the resolution to a vote that he could lose."

Source:
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION, DRUG FORFEITURE FUND
Where Will the Emergency Money Come From?
3 days ago
THE DETAILS

"ABC News has learned the president plans to announce on Friday his intention to spend about $8 billion on the border wall with a mix of spending from Congressional appropriations approved Thursday night, executive action and an emergency declaration. A senior White House official familiar with the plan told ABC News that $1.375 billion would come from the spending bill Congress passed Thursday; $600 million would come from the Treasury Department's drug forfeiture fund; $2.5 billion would come from the Pentagon's drug interdiction program; and through an emergency declaration: $3.5 billion from the Pentagon's military construction budget."

Source:
TRUMP SAYS HE WILL SIGN
House Passes Funding Deal
3 days ago
THE DETAILS

"The House passed a massive border and budget bill that would avert a shutdown and keep the government funded through the end of September. The Senate passed the measure earlier Thursday. The bill provides $1.375 billion for fences, far short of the $5.7 billion President Trump had demanded to fund steel walls. But the president says he will sign the legislation, and instead seek to fund his border wall by declaring a national emergency."

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login