Attention mayors, governors, and economic development gurus: Your plans to lure young college graduates to your cities with downtown lofts and local start-ups are not working. Instead, millennials are opting to move from their college towns to a much smaller cluster of cities than they did 30 years ago — places such as Boulder, Colo., Washington D.C; Cambridge, Mass.; or San Jose, Calif.
In 1970, 20 metro areas around the country claimed 24.6 percent of people with bachelor’s degrees who chose to live in cities, says Alan Berube, a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution. By 2010, that share had jumped to 43.4 percent.
This means that almost half of college graduates in the nation’s biggest cities are clustered in just 20 places. That’s a huge concentration of the well-educated workforce: people who companies want to hire, who tend to outearn those with high-school degrees, and whose earning can significantly add to a city’s tax base.
Share of the population with a bachelor’s degree or higher and change in share between 1980 and 2010 by metro area population
Roll over a circle or choose a city from the drop-down menu for more information.
Why should we care about this trend in where urban-loving college grads prefer to live? Well, this and other economic data show that the country is increasingly divided, not just economically between the rich and the poor but also geographically along economic lines.
The ”gilded cities,” such as New York and Cambridge, have bright futures because they’re attracting the country’s most educated workforce. (The most popular cities for college grads tend to either be considered tech hubs or are home to robust universities.) Meanwhile, place such as like Phoenix or Oklahoma City may eventually fall further behind. It’s literally a tale of two cities — and the different directions they’re headed in — as the best-educated urban dwellers in the U.S. pick their handful of spots to call home.
What We're Following See More »
"President Trump is preparing to impose a package of $60 billion in annual tariffs against China, following through on a long-time threat that he says will punish China for intellectual property infringement and create more American jobs. The tariff package, which Trump plans to unveil by Friday, was confirmed by four senior administration officials. Senior aides had presented Trump with a $30 billion tariff package that would apply to a range of products, but Trump directed them to roughly double the scope of the new trade levies."
"President Trump’s attorneys have provided the special counsel’s office with written descriptions that chronicle key moments under investigation in hopes of curtailing the scope of a presidential interview, according to two people familiar with the situation. Trump’s legal team recently shared the documents in an effort to limit any session between the president and special counsel Robert S. Mueller III to a few select topics" on order to "minimize his exposure. ... The lawyers are worried that Trump, who has a penchant for making erroneous claims, would be vulnerable in an hours-long interview."
White House Lawyer Ty Cobb said that President Trump not considering firing special counsel Robert Mueller. Speculation swirled after Trump attacked the investigation on Twitter, and called out Mueller directly for the first time. “In response to media speculation and related questions being posed to the Administration," Cobb said, "...the President is not considering or discussing the firing of the Special Counsel, Robert Mueller." Several members of Congress, "including some top Republicans, warned Trump to not even think about terminating Mueller."