Attention mayors, governors, and economic development gurus: Your plans to lure young college graduates to your cities with downtown lofts and local start-ups are not working. Instead, millennials are opting to move from their college towns to a much smaller cluster of cities than they did 30 years ago — places such as Boulder, Colo., Washington D.C; Cambridge, Mass.; or San Jose, Calif.
In 1970, 20 metro areas around the country claimed 24.6 percent of people with bachelor’s degrees who chose to live in cities, says Alan Berube, a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution. By 2010, that share had jumped to 43.4 percent.
This means that almost half of college graduates in the nation’s biggest cities are clustered in just 20 places. That’s a huge concentration of the well-educated workforce: people who companies want to hire, who tend to outearn those with high-school degrees, and whose earning can significantly add to a city’s tax base.
Share of the population with a bachelor’s degree or higher and change in share between 1980 and 2010 by metro area population
Roll over a circle or choose a city from the drop-down menu for more information.
Why should we care about this trend in where urban-loving college grads prefer to live? Well, this and other economic data show that the country is increasingly divided, not just economically between the rich and the poor but also geographically along economic lines.
The ”gilded cities,” such as New York and Cambridge, have bright futures because they’re attracting the country’s most educated workforce. (The most popular cities for college grads tend to either be considered tech hubs or are home to robust universities.) Meanwhile, place such as like Phoenix or Oklahoma City may eventually fall further behind. It’s literally a tale of two cities — and the different directions they’re headed in — as the best-educated urban dwellers in the U.S. pick their handful of spots to call home.
What We're Following See More »
"A federal appeals court's decision that declared the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau an arm of the White House relies on a novel interpretation of the constitution's separation of powers clause that could have broader effects on how other regulators" like the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency and the Federal Housing Finance Agency.
"According to a new POLITICO/Morning Consult poll, the first national post-debate survey, 43 percent of registered voters said the Democratic candidate won, compared with 26 percent who opted for the Republican Party’s standard bearer. Her 6-point lead over Trump among likely voters is unchanged from our previous survey: Clinton still leads Trump 42 percent to 36 percent in the race for the White House, with Libertarian nominee Gary Johnson taking 9 percent of the vote."
Twitter bots, "automated social media accounts that interact with other users," accounted for a large part of the online discussion during the first presidential debate. Bots made up 22 percent of conversation about Hillary Clinton on the social media platform, and a whopping one third of Twitter conversation about Donald Trump.
The International Consortium of Investigative Journalists, the nonprofit that published the Panama Papers earlier this year, is being spun off from its parent organization, the Center for Public Integrity. According to a statement, "CPI’s Board of Directors has decided that enabling the ICIJ to chart its own course will help both journalistic teams build on the massive impact they have had as one organization."
According to a new report, the Environmental Protection Agency waited too long before informing the residents of Flint, Mich. that their water was contaminated with lead. Written by the EPA's inspector general, it places blame squarely at the foot of the agency itself, saying it had enough information by June 2015 to issue an emergency order. However, the order wasn't issued until the end of January 2016.