Outside Influences

Farm Bill a Rare Bipartisan Win

The deal is something you don't see often anymore—one that has victories for both parties, both chambers, and key stakeholders.

Rep. Collin Peterson
AP Photo/Steve Karnowski
Dec. 11, 2018, 8 p.m.

The farm-bill conference report, which passed the Senate on Tuesday and is likely to pass the House this week, is a marvel of bipartisan, bicameral compromise in one of the most difficult, divided periods in American political life.

The conference report, formally titled the “Agricultural Improvement Act of 2018” is perhaps the dullest farm bill since modern farm legislation began in the 1930s. That reflects how farmers were largely happy with the structure of the safety-net programs in the 2014 farm bill and that Democrats refused to accept House conservatives’ attempt to impose stiffer work requirements that would make it make it harder for low-income people to qualify for the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program.

Environmentalists and Senate Democrats also insisted that Trump administration-backed House-farm-bill provisions to allow exemptions from environmental laws for removal of timber from the forest floor and thinning of forests be softened.

In a sign that the White House was consulted on the bill before it was finalized, Agriculture Secretary Sonny Perdue has already said he will “encourage” President Trump to sign it.

“While we would have liked to see more progress on work requirements for SNAP recipients and forest-management reforms, the conference agreement does include several helpful provisions and we will continue to build upon these through our authorities,” Perdue added.

But perhaps the most impressive achievement is that the House and Senate agriculture committees, largely thanks to their staffs, managed to make many producer-pleasing tweaks to farm programs while staying within the amount of money that the Congressional Budget Office said the 2014 farm bill would cost if it were extended for 10 years, roughly $867 billion.

Most of those tweaks are so technical that they are of interest only to the people who will benefit from them. But House Agriculture Committee ranking member Collin Peterson said provisions to manage dairy-price risk and encourage milk consumption are the biggest improvements in the entire bill.

The bill also removes hemp’s classification as a drug and provides incentives for farmers to grow it. The matter was of such importance to Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell’s Kentucky farmers that he signed the conference report with a hemp pen.

Major farm groups have already praised the bill and called on Congress to pass it quickly so Trump can sign it. But even more impressive are the positive statements from nutrition advocates and representatives of smaller farmers, the organic-food industry, and animal advocates.

The liberal Center on Budget and Policy Priorities and the Food Research & Action Center have both praised the bill for rejecting the House SNAP provisions, which they deemed harmful. The American Heart Association said the bill “will ensure more than 45 million eligible people and their families who are struggling through underemployment and low or stagnant wages” will continue to get SNAP benefits, and also noted that the bill will help low-income families increase fruit and vegetable purchases and improve their nutrition.

The National Sustainable Agriculture Coalition, which represents smaller, environmentally-minded farmers, praised the bill for providing permanent funding for “tiny but mighty” programs that help beginning and minority farmers, and for continuing the Conservation Stewardship Program that the House bill would have merged with another program.

The bill also provides $50 million in annual funding for organic research, more than double the current funding level. Laura Batcha, executive director of the Organic Trade Association, said, “This will ensure stable, baseline mandatory funding for the program, and will enable organic farmers to meet the unique challenges they face.”

Livestock groups got their key demand: $300 million in mandatory funding for a national laboratory network for animal disease and preparedness, and a vaccine bank to be used in case of outbreaks of dread diseases.

Animal-welfare advocates were pleased with the conference report’s provisions to crack down on animal fighting, the dog-meat trade, and domestic violence against pets. The bill also eliminated a House-bill provision written by Rep. Steve King that would have made it illegal for a state to establish production standards on foods sold in that state, such as California has done with eggs.

Marty Irby of Animal Wellness Action said the 2018 farm bill “may just be the best farm bill for animal protection in history!”

In a rare rebuke to the Trump administration, the conference report reestablishes the position of undersecretary for rural development, which Perdue had downgraded to an assistant within his office.

House Agriculture Committee Chairman Mike Conaway got his way with a provision that allows cousins, nieces, and nephews to qualify for farm subsidies.

Sen. Chuck Grassley, a longtime fighter for payment limits, voted against the bill, but acknowledged that it contains so many provisions positive for agriculture, he expected it to pass.

What We're Following See More »
AVOIDS SHUTDOWN WITH A FEW HOURS TO SPARE
Trump Signs Border Deal
1 weeks ago
THE LATEST

"President Trump signed a sweeping spending bill Friday afternoon, averting another partial government shutdown. The action came after Trump had declared a national emergency in a move designed to circumvent Congress and build additional barriers at the southern border, where he said the United States faces 'an invasion of our country.'"

Source:
REDIRECTS $8 BILLION
Trump Declares National Emergency
1 weeks ago
THE DETAILS

"President Donald Trump on Friday declared a state of emergency on the southern border and immediately direct $8 billion to construct or repair as many as 234 miles of a border barrier. The move — which is sure to invite vigorous legal challenges from activists and government officials — comes after Trump failed to get the $5.7 billion he was seeking from lawmakers. Instead, Trump agreed to sign a deal that included just $1.375 for border security."

Source:
COULD SOW DIVISION AMONG REPUBLICANS
House Will Condemn Emergency Declaration
1 weeks ago
THE DETAILS

"House Democrats are gearing up to pass a joint resolution disapproving of President Trump’s emergency declaration to build his U.S.-Mexico border wall, a move that will force Senate Republicans to vote on a contentious issue that divides their party. House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerrold Nadler (D-N.Y.) said Thursday evening in an interview with The Washington Post that the House would take up the resolution in the coming days or weeks. The measure is expected to easily clear the Democratic-led House, and because it would be privileged, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) would be forced to put the resolution to a vote that he could lose."

Source:
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION, DRUG FORFEITURE FUND
Where Will the Emergency Money Come From?
1 weeks ago
THE DETAILS

"ABC News has learned the president plans to announce on Friday his intention to spend about $8 billion on the border wall with a mix of spending from Congressional appropriations approved Thursday night, executive action and an emergency declaration. A senior White House official familiar with the plan told ABC News that $1.375 billion would come from the spending bill Congress passed Thursday; $600 million would come from the Treasury Department's drug forfeiture fund; $2.5 billion would come from the Pentagon's drug interdiction program; and through an emergency declaration: $3.5 billion from the Pentagon's military construction budget."

Source:
TRUMP SAYS HE WILL SIGN
House Passes Funding Deal
1 weeks ago
THE DETAILS

"The House passed a massive border and budget bill that would avert a shutdown and keep the government funded through the end of September. The Senate passed the measure earlier Thursday. The bill provides $1.375 billion for fences, far short of the $5.7 billion President Trump had demanded to fund steel walls. But the president says he will sign the legislation, and instead seek to fund his border wall by declaring a national emergency."

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login