Obama to Dropped Insurance Customers: ‘Just Shop Around in the New Marketplace, That’s What It’s For’

The president says the idea that people are being dropped from their current plans is “grossly” misleading.

President Barack Obama makes remarks during a ceremonial swearing-in of FBI Director James Comey at the FBI Headquarters October 28, 2013.
National Journal
Brian Resnick
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Brian Resnick
Oct. 30, 2013, 12:43 p.m.

Pres­id­ent Obama today ad­dressed con­cerns over people be­ing dropped from their health care in­sur­ance plans since the im­ple­ment­a­tion of Obama­care. Cer­tain people who had pur­chased in­di­vidu­al in­sur­ance plans, in re­cent weeks, are find­ing out that such plans do not com­ply with the new law. And some of these people will have to pay more for up­graded plans.

Crit­ics of the ad­min­is­tra­tion, and fact check­ers at pub­lic­a­tions such as The Wash­ing­ton Post, are say­ing this is a dir­ect con­tra­dic­tion of the pres­id­ent’s cam­paign prom­ise that “if you like your plan, you can keep it” un­der Obama­care.

Ad­dress­ing these con­cerns, the pres­id­ent said these dropped cus­tom­ers should use the new in­sur­ance mar­ket­place to buy bet­ter plans. This, mean­while, was after an ad­mis­sion that such mar­ket­places barely work. The pres­id­ent said that any­one “ped­dling the no­tion” that in­surers are sum­mar­ily drop­ping people is be­ing disin­genu­ous, be­cause the com­pan­ies will of­fer plans in their place. “If you leave that stuff out, you’re be­ing grossly misled.”

Here’s what the pres­id­ent said (em­phas­is ours):

Now, if you had one of these sub­stand­ard plans be­fore the Af­ford­able Care Act be­came … and you really liked that plan, you were able to keep it. That’s what I said when I was run­ning for of­fice. That was part of the prom­ise we made. But ever since the law was passed, if in­surers de­cided to down­grade or can­cel these sub­stand­ard plans, we said un­der the law, you’ve got to re­place them with qual­ity, com­pre­hens­ive cov­er­age. Be­cause that, too, was a cent­ral premise of the Af­ford­able Care Act from the very be­gin­ning. And today that prom­ise means that every plan in the mar­ket­place cov­ers a cor­set of min­im­um be­ne­fits like ma­ter­nity care and pre­vent­at­ive care and pre­scrip­tion drug be­ne­fits and hos­pit­al­iz­a­tion.

And they can’t use al­ler­gies or preg­nancy or a sports in­jury or the fact that you’re a wo­man to charge you more. They can’t do that any­more. They can’t do that any­more. If you couldn’t af­ford cov­er­age be­cause your child had asthma, well, he’s now covered. If you are one of the 45 mil­lion Amer­ic­ans with a men­tal ill­ness, you’re covered. If you’re ex­pect­ing a baby, you’re covered, safer. The sys­tem is more se­cure for you, and it’s more se­cure for every­body. So if you’re get­ting one of these let­ters, just shop around in the new mar­ket­place. That what it’s for.

What We're Following See More »
NEVER TRUMP
USA Today Weighs in on Presidential Race for First Time Ever
45 minutes ago
THE DETAILS

"By all means vote, just not for Donald Trump." That's the message from USA Today editors, who are making the first recommendation on a presidential race in the paper's 34-year history. It's not exactly an endorsement; they make clear that the editorial board "does not have a consensus for a Clinton endorsement." But they state flatly that Donald Trump is, by "unanimous consensus of the editorial board, unfit for the presidency."

Source:
COMMISSIONERS NEED TO DELIBERATE MORE
FCC Pushes Vote on Set-Top Boxes
49 minutes ago
THE LATEST

"Federal regulators on Thursday delayed a vote on a proposal to reshape the television market by freeing consumers from cable box rentals, putting into doubt a plan that has pitted technology companies against cable television providers. ... The proposal will still be considered for a future vote. But Tom Wheeler, chairman of the F.C.C., said commissioners needed more discussions."

Source:
UNTIL DEC. 9, ANYWAY
Obama Signs Bill to Fund Government
6 hours ago
THE LATEST
REDSKINS IMPLICATIONS
SCOTUS to Hear Case on Offensive Trademarks
6 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

"The Supreme Court is taking up a First Amendment clash over the government’s refusal to register offensive trademarks, a case that could affect the Washington Redskins in their legal fight over the team name. The justices agreed Thursday to hear a dispute involving an Asian-American rock band called the Slants, but they did not act on a separate request to hear the higher-profile Redskins case at the same time." Still, any precedent set by the case could have ramifications for the Washington football team.

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Bannon Still Collecting Royalties from ‘Seinfeld’
7 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

The Hollywood Reporter takes a look at a little-known intersection of politics and entertainment, in which Trump campaign CEO Steve Bannon is still raking in residuals from Seinfeld. Here's the digest version: When Seinfeld was in its infancy, Ted Turner was in the process of acquiring its production company, Castle Rock, but he was under-capitalized. Bannon's fledgling media company put up the remaining funds, and he agreed to "participation rights" instead of a fee. "Seinfeld has reaped more than $3 billion in its post-network afterlife through syndication deals." Meanwhile, Bannon is "still cashing checks from Seinfeld, and observers say he has made nearly 25 times more off the Castle Rock deal than he had anticipated."

Source:
×