Outside Influences

Farm Bill's Fate Hinges on Forestry Policy

Late in the game, the White House is insisting that key forestry provisions from the House version of the farm bill be included in the final deal.

Agriculture Secretary Sonny Perdue and Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke after touring fire-ravaged Paradise, Calif., on Monday
AP Photo/Rich Pedroncelli
Nov. 27, 2018, 8 p.m.

The fate of the farm bill has come down to forestry-policy changes that the Trump administration says it wants in order to discourage fires like the ones that have recently devastated California.

In a pre-Thanksgiving news conference, Agriculture Secretary Sonny Perdue, who manages the U.S. Forest Service, and Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke, who manages other agencies with forest lands, said the conference report on the House- and Senate-passed bills should include forestry provisions that are in the House bill that passed with only Republican votes. Those provisions would give the agencies that manage the nation’s forests authority to engage in “good neighbor” partnerships with localities and tribes, clear the forest floors of dead trees and dense brush, engage in more prescribed burns of forests to discourage fires on a larger scale, and allow for the expedited approval of salvage-logging projects to remove charred and dead logs after a fire.

Perdue said during the call that the administration was not asking for authority for “clear-cutting” of forests, a practice that grossly offends environmentalists.

But Senate Appropriations Committee Vice Chairman Patrick Leahy of Vermont said in a quickly issued news release, “It is outrageous that House Republicans and the Trump administration are continuing to hold up the farm-bill negotiations over harmful and extreme forestry provisions. Secretaries Perdue and Zinke shockingly are trying to co-opt the terrible tragedies in California to push for the Trump administration’s crass, cynical, and unaccountable logging of the public’s national forests.”

On Monday, Senate Agriculture Committee ranking member Debbie Stabenow of Michigan said that the forestry demands could “bring down” the farm bill. On Tuesday, she added that the farm bill could not pass the Senate with those provisions.

Stabenow also pointed out that the Forest Service got more authorities for fire suppression in an omnibus appropriations bill earlier this year, but hasn’t implemented them yet.

What’s so odd about this situation is the Trump administration’s decision to bring up this issue so late in the farm-bill decision-making process.

Until the press conference with Zinke, Perdue said repeatedly that he would defer to Congress on the farm bill. Even though he and President Trump said they favored stiffer work requirements for beneficiaries of the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, Perdue said it was up to Congress to decide on that issue, which has been regarded as the most contentious in the bill. (The SNAP portion has been resolved to her satisfaction, Stabenow said Monday.)

The forestry title of the farm bill is traditionally a minor part of that legislation, focused mostly on how the Agriculture Department helps private foresters, while other legislation governs major forestry management. In this year’s farm-bill discussions, the forestry title hadn’t been mentioned among the major issues until last week.

White House involvement in the decision to make this such a big public issue became evident when the White House, rather than Agriculture or Interior, released a transcript of the Perdue-Zinke call to reporters. The White House also released an op-ed by Zinke on CNN.com calling for Congress to include the House farm bill's forestry provisions in the conference report so that the government can engage in “active management” of the forests.

It is highly unusual for a Cabinet secretary to tell Congress what it should include in a bill covering programs managed by another department.

Why the Trump administration decided to get so publicly involved in this issue remains something of a mystery.

When Trump visited Paradise, California, after the fire, he had a strongly emotional reaction, saying, “We’ve never seen anything like this.”

On Monday, when Perdue and Zinke followed Trump to Paradise, The Sacramento Bee reported that Perdue said Paradise should be rebuilt using timber from the nearby Plumas National Forest. Perdue added, “I don’t know what kind of legal hurdles we’re going to face.”

Peter Nelson, federal-lands director at the environmental group Defenders of Wildlife, gave an indication of those hurdles when he told the Bee, “The Dems are now able to bring some common sense and oversight to the administration’s agenda."

Nelson said many environmentalists agree with the concept of reducing fuel loads in overgrown forests, but that Trump’s criticisms of environmentalists aren't helping forge agreement.

“It’s a missed opportunity,” Nelson told the Bee. “There’s lots of people wanting to work with the administration on this, but now we’re feeling alienated because of all the finger pointing.”

The forestry issue has now been bumped up to Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, House Speaker Paul Ryan, and House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi.

Schumer told reporters Tuesday that forestry is the only major farm-bill issue left and that Democrats “hope we can get a farm bill this year.”

What We're Following See More »
BARR PLANS TO SEND CONGRESS A SUMMARY
Mueller Report Almost Done
5 hours ago
THE DETAILS

“Attorney General Bill Barr is preparing to announce as early as next week the completion of Robert Mueller's Russia investigation, with plans for Barr to submit to Congress soon after a summary of Mueller's confidential report. ... The preparations are the clearest indication yet that Mueller is nearly done with his almost two-year investigation. The precise timing of the announcement is subject to change. The scope and contours of what Barr will send to Congress remain unclear.”

IN UNANIMOUS DECISION
SCOTUS Limits State and Local Governments' Ability to Levy Fines
8 hours ago
THE DETAILS

"The U.S. Supreme Court curbed the power of cities and states to levy fines and seize property, siding with a man trying to keep his Land Rover after he pleaded guilty to selling drugs. The unanimous ruling marks the first time the court has said that states and cities are bound by the Constitution’s ban on excessive fines, part of the Eighth Amendment."

Source:
AFTER U.S. WITHDRAWS FROM INF TREATY
Putin Threatens Arms Race
8 hours ago
THE LATEST

"Moscow will match any U.S. move to deploy new nuclear missiles closer to Russia by stationing its own missiles closer to the United States or by deploying faster missiles or both, President Vladimir Putin said on Wednesday. Putin said Russia was not seeking confrontation and would not take the first step to deploy missiles in response to Washington’s decision this month to quit a landmark Cold War-era arms control treaty."

Source:
MAY 26-28
Trump to Visit Japan
9 hours ago
THE LATEST
AVOIDS SHUTDOWN WITH A FEW HOURS TO SPARE
Trump Signs Border Deal
5 days ago
THE LATEST

"President Trump signed a sweeping spending bill Friday afternoon, averting another partial government shutdown. The action came after Trump had declared a national emergency in a move designed to circumvent Congress and build additional barriers at the southern border, where he said the United States faces 'an invasion of our country.'"

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login