Will Insularity, Incompetence, and Lies Doom Obamacare?

Four lessons from the launch that could save the law and health care coverage for millions.

President Barack Obama waits for a translation of his remarks during a meeting with Iraqi Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki in the Oval Office of the White House on November 1, 2013.
National Journal
Ron Fournier
Nov. 4, 2013, 12:18 a.m.

In­su­lar­ity, in­com­pet­ence, and de­cep­tion doomed the launch of the Af­ford­able Care Act, ac­cord­ing to post­mortems on Pres­id­ent Obama’s health in­sur­ance law. The pres­id­ent now has two choices: A) Ac­cept the ver­dict and learn from it, or B) stick with in­su­lar­ity, in­com­pet­ence, and de­cep­tion.

Early signs point to Obama com­pound­ing rather than cor­rect­ing his team’s er­rors.

Stay­ing the course is a los­ing op­tion for Obama­care and the more than 40 mil­lion Amer­ic­ans who need health in­sur­ance. The trouble is far deep­er than a “glitchy” web­site, ac­cord­ing to nu­mer­ous me­dia re­ports, in­clud­ing an in-depth in­vest­ig­a­tion by The Wash­ing­ton Post. Among oth­er things, The Post un­covered a 2010 memo from a trus­ted out­side health ad­viser warn­ing that no one in the ad­min­is­tra­tion was “up to the task” of con­struct­ing an in­sur­ance ex­change and oth­er com­plex­it­ies of the 2,000-page law.

The good news is there is time to learn from—and re­cov­er from—the early stumbles. Here are four im­port­ant les­sons from the post­mortems.

1) Reach out bey­ond your in­ner circle. Obama ig­nored ef­forts by Har­vard pro­fess­or Dav­id Cut­ler and his own eco­nom­ic team to get him to ap­point an out­side health re­form “czar” with a back­ground in tech­no­logy, in­sur­ance, and busi­ness. In­stead, the pres­id­ent stuck with his health policy team led by Nancy-Ann De­Parle, a former Clin­ton ap­pointee with a checkered re­cord in the private sec­tor. His team was built to pass le­gis­la­tion, not im­ple­ment it.

“They were run­ning the biggest start-up in the world, and they didn’t have any­one who had run a start-up, or even run a busi­ness,” Cut­ler told The Post. “It’s very hard to think of a situ­ation where the people best at get­ting le­gis­la­tion passed are best at im­ple­ment­ing it. They are a dif­fer­ent set of skills.”

Obama re­cently ap­poin­ted man­ager-ex­traordin­aire Jeff Zi­ents to over­see ef­forts to fix the troubled web­site. It’s not clear that Zi­ents or any oth­er ac­com­plished lead­er will be put in charge of im­ple­ment­a­tion at large. (Zi­ents will be­come dir­ect­or of the Na­tion­al Eco­nom­ic Coun­cil in Janu­ary.)

2) Don’t lie. The Obama White House has a cred­ib­il­ity prob­lem, one that could in­fect his en­tire agenda. It star­ted when the White House re­fused to re­lease data on the num­ber of people who en­rolled in the on­line mar­ket­place, an im­port­ant met­ric for de­term­in­ing the ef­fect­ive­ness of the $400 mil­lion-plus site. Ad­min­is­tra­tion of­fi­cials say they don’t have the data, which is either a mark of ex­traordin­ary in­com­pet­ence or a lie.

The prob­lem was com­poun­ded when mil­lions of self-in­sured Amer­ic­ans re­ceived no­tices that their health care policies were be­ing can­celed. For years, Obama pledged that “if you like your health care plan, you’ll be able to keep your health care plan. Peri­od.”  Ac­cord­ing to The Wall Street Journ­al, Obama’s ad­visers knew the pres­id­ent was mak­ing a prom­ise he couldn’t keep, and de­bated wheth­er to have the pres­id­ent “ex­plain the nu­ances of the suc­cinct line in his stump speeches.” In oth­er words, they de­bated wheth­er to tell the full truth and de­cided against it. They know­ingly told a false­hood, which is by defin­i­tion a lie.

Rather than ac­know­ledge the de­cep­tion, the White House has launched a pub­lic-re­la­tions ef­fort to mit­ig­ate it. The most brazen ex­ample is the White House’s use of Twit­ter in an at­tempt to dis­cred­it an NBC story that ac­cur­ately de­scribed the White House’s de­cep­tion. “NBC ‘scoop’ cites nor­mal turnover in the in­div in­sur­ance mar­ket,” White House spokes­man Josh Earn­est tweeted to his 9,500 fol­low­ers on Twit­ter, ac­cord­ing to a Re­u­ters story on the op­er­a­tion.

3) Cre­ate an ef­fi­cient health in­sur­ance bur­eau­cracy. Ac­cord­ing to The Post, the de­cision to put ACA im­ple­ment­a­tion in the hands of the Cen­ters for Medi­care and Medi­caid Ser­vices was fate­ful. Polit­ics played a role. Ad­min­is­tra­tion of­fi­cials thought it would pro­tect the pro­ject from House Re­pub­lic­ans who are try­ing to un­der­mine the law. Money was an­oth­er reas­on. The ACA did not in­clude fund­ing for the de­vel­op­ment of a fed­er­al ex­change, and the White House knew Re­pub­lic­ans would block any at­tempts to get it. The res­ult was a dis­astrously frag­men­ted pro­cess. As a source told The Post, “There wasn’t a per­son who said, ‘My job is the seam­less im­ple­ment­a­tion of the Af­ford­able Care Act.’ “

The White House and its al­lies blame Re­pub­lic­ans for the lack of money and op­tions. It’s an un­der­stand­able re­ac­tion. The GOP-con­trolled House wants to gut the law.

But it’s no ex­cuse. Obama pushed a par­tis­an law through a Demo­crat­ic-con­trolled Con­gress and now bears the re­spons­ib­il­ity for im­ple­ment­ing it. If Obama fails, his­tory will judge the chief ex­ec­ut­ive more harshly than one cham­ber of the le­gis­lat­ive branch. More im­port­ant, mis­man­age­ment of ACA would give a gen­er­a­tion of Amer­ic­ans reas­on to ques­tion the Demo­crat­ic Party’s core ar­gu­ment that gov­ern­ment can do good things.

4) New lead­er­ship is needed. The Post re­ports that Obama fre­quently tried to keep his team on task. Hours after the bill passed, the pres­id­ent told cel­eb­rat­ing aides that the hard work of im­ple­ment­a­tion be­gins in the morn­ing. Dur­ing reg­u­lar staff meet­ings to mon­it­or pro­gress, he in­vari­ably turned at­ten­tion to the web­site. If it doesn’t work, Obama said, “noth­ing else mat­ters.” In one meet­ing, he told seni­or ad­visers that im­ple­ment­ing ACA was the most im­port­ant job of his pres­id­ency. “We’ve got to do it right,” Obama said.

Those an­ec­dotes seem to be­lie the im­pres­sion that Obama was dis­en­gaged. Even so, the pres­id­ent needs to do some soul-search­ing. What did I miss, and why? What was kept from me, and why? Who failed to do their jobs right? Who failed to tell me the job wasn’t get­ting done right? Do I have the right people on the job?

Be­cause as long as the pres­id­ent sticks with the team that failed the coun­try and lied, it’s fair to as­sume that he hasn’t learned the most ba­sic les­sons from the launch.

{{ BIZOBJ (video: 4532) }}

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
These (Supposed) Iowa and NH Escorts Tell All
4 hours ago
NATIONAL JOURNAL AFTER DARK

Before we get to the specifics of this exposé about escorts working the Iowa and New Hampshire primary crowds, let’s get three things out of the way: 1.) It’s from Cosmopolitan; 2.) most of the women quoted use fake (if colorful) names; and 3.) again, it’s from Cosmopolitan. That said, here’s what we learned:

  • Business was booming: one escort who says she typically gets two inquiries a weekend got 15 requests in the pre-primary weekend.
  • Their primary season clientele is a bit older than normal—”40s through mid-60s, compared with mostly twentysomething regulars” and “they’ve clearly done this before.”
  • They seemed more nervous than other clients, because “the stakes are higher when you’re working for a possible future president” but “all practiced impeccable manners.”
  • One escort “typically enjoy[s] the company of Democrats more, just because I feel like our views line up a lot more.”
Source:
STATE VS. FEDERAL
Restoring Some Sanity to Encryption
4 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

No matter where you stand on mandating companies to include a backdoor in encryption technologies, it doesn’t make sense to allow that decision to be made on a state level. “The problem with state-level legislation of this nature is that it manages to be both wildly impractical and entirely unenforceable,” writes Brian Barrett at Wired. There is a solution to this problem. “California Congressman Ted Lieu has introduced the ‘Ensuring National Constitutional Rights for Your Private Telecommunications Act of 2016,’ which we’ll call ENCRYPT. It’s a short, straightforward bill with a simple aim: to preempt states from attempting to implement their own anti-encryption policies at a state level.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
What the Current Crop of Candidates Could Learn from JFK
4 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Hillary Is Running Against the Bill of 1992
4 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

The New Covenant. The Third Way. The Democratic Leadership Council style. Call it what you will, but whatever centrist triangulation Bill Clinton embraced in 1992, Hillary Clinton wants no part of it in 2016. Writing for Bloomberg, Sasha Issenberg and Margaret Talev explore how Hillary’s campaign has “diverged pointedly” from what made Bill so successful: “For Hillary to survive, Clintonism had to die.” Bill’s positions in 1992—from capital punishment to free trade—“represented a carefully calibrated diversion from the liberal orthodoxy of the previous decade.” But in New Hampshire, Hillary “worked to juggle nostalgia for past Clinton primary campaigns in the state with the fact that the Bill of 1992 or the Hillary of 2008 would likely be a marginal figure within today’s Democratic politics.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Trevor Noah Needs to Find His Voice. And Fast.
5 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

At first, “it was pleasant” to see Trevor Noah “smiling away and deeply dimpling in the Stewart seat, the seat that had lately grown gray hairs,” writes The Atlantic‘s James Parker in assessing the new host of the once-indispensable Daily Show. But where Jon Stewart was a heavyweight, Noah is “a very able lightweight, [who] needs time too. But he won’t get any. As a culture, we’re not about to nurture this talent, to give it room to grow. Our patience was exhausted long ago, by some other guy. We’re going to pass judgment and move on. There’s a reason Simon Cowell is so rich. Impress us today or get thee hence. So it comes to this: It’s now or never, Trevor.”

Source:
×