Health Care

America Is Running Out of Doctors

Who will treat the millions of newly insured citizens next year?

National Journal
Add to Briefcase
Marina Koren
Nov. 4, 2013, 11 a.m.

This fall, mil­lions of un­in­sured Amer­ic­ans seek­ing health in­sur­ance, many for the first time, over­whelmed the un­pre­pared fed­er­al web­site, still un­der re­pair, built to give it to them. Next year, the same people, all head­ing to hos­pit­als and phys­i­cians’ of­fices ready to make use of their new cov­er­age, could crash something more tan­gible: the U.S. health care sys­tem it­self.

Amer­ica is run­ning out of doc­tors, and next year’s in­flux of pa­tients will strain the cur­rent sup­ply. The na­tion will be 91,500 phys­i­cians short by 2020, ac­cord­ing to the As­so­ci­ation of Amer­ic­an Med­ic­al Col­leges. By 2025, that num­ber is ex­pec­ted to swell to more than 130,600.

Next year, the de­mand will be highest for primary-care phys­i­cians, such as gen­er­al in­tern­ists, fam­ily doc­tors, and pe­di­at­ri­cians — the kinds of doc­tors many people go to first for none­mer­gency med­ic­al at­ten­tion be­fore see­ing spe­cial­ists. Last winter, an An­nals of Fam­ily Medi­cine study pre­dicted the coun­try will need 52,000 more primary-care phys­i­cians by 2025.

The warn­ings aren’t any­thing new. But they carry more weight now that the health care in­dustry must soon meet the needs of mil­lions of newly in­sured cit­izens. Not enough doc­tors could mean longer wait times in more-crowded rooms, and some prac­tices may stop ac­cept­ing new pa­tients al­to­geth­er. In Ju­ly, half of primary-care prac­tices re­main closed to new pa­tients in Mas­sachu­setts, sev­en years after the state en­acted Obama­care-style health re­form. For pa­tients at prac­tices grow­ing their cus­tom­er base, wait­ing times for ap­point­ments with primary-care phys­i­cians re­main high. How would that look on a na­tion­al scale?

A lar­ger num­ber of people seek­ing med­ic­al at­ten­tion isn’t the only bur­den for Amer­ica’s doc­tor short­age. Baby boomers are get­ting older and gain­ing new ail­ments, which trans­lates in­to more doc­tor vis­its. Also aging are those prac­ti­cing medi­cine them­selves, who are near­ing re­tire­ment age. Amer­ic­ans, in­sured and un­in­sured alike, are sick­er than ever be­fore. More than one in five middle-aged adults have more than one chron­ic health con­di­tion, such as hy­per­ten­sion and dia­betes, worse than a dec­ade ago.

So, what can we do? Mint new doc­tors, for one. That pro­spect, un­til re­cently, looked pretty bleak. But this fall, the U.S. saw a re­cord num­ber of stu­dents ap­ply­ing for and en­rolling in the coun­try’s med­ic­al schools, ac­cord­ing to the AAMC. The num­ber of ap­plic­ants grew by 6.1 per­cent, to 48,014, from the pre­vi­ous fall, break­ing a pre­vi­ous high in 1996. The num­ber of stu­dents who en­rolled sur­passed 20,000 for the first time, a 2.8 per­cent in­crease since 2012.

More med-school stu­dents doesn’t ne­ces­sar­ily mean more doc­tors, however. AAMC points out that the num­ber of res­id­ences, cru­cial stages of med­ic­al train­ing, re­main un­changed, thanks to a gov­ern­ment-im­posed cap. The or­gan­iz­a­tion has pushed Con­gress to change the law, pre­dict­ing that there won’t be enough res­id­en­cies for many hope­ful doc­tors by 2015.

For oth­ers, however, mak­ing new doc­tors isn’t the only an­swer. An­oth­er solu­tion in­volves broad­en­ing the defin­i­tion of primary care by al­low­ing oth­er health care pro­fes­sion­als to do more for pa­tients — and even re­place doc­tors in some clin­ic­al set­tings.

Ex­pand­ing med­ic­al homes and health cen­ters where nurse prac­ti­tion­ers and phys­i­cian as­sist­ants are in charge could cut the primary-care phys­i­cian short­age in half by 2025, ac­cord­ing to a study by RAND Cor­por­a­tion, a non­par­tis­an policy re­search group, pub­lished Monday in the journ­al Health Af­fairs.

Nurse-man­aged care could be cheap­er than phys­i­cian-ad­min­istered treat­ment, too, ac­cord­ing to new re­search from the Uni­versity of Cali­for­nia (San Fran­cisco). In states that re­quire nurse prac­ti­tion­ers to treat pa­tients with the help or su­per­vi­sion of a phys­i­cian, a vis­it to the clin­ic cost $543. In states that al­low nurse prac­ti­tion­ers to prac­tice and pre­scribe on their own, the price tag is $484. Spread­ing the lat­ter meth­od to the rest of the coun­try would save the coun­try hun­dreds of mil­lions of dol­lars in health care costs, the re­search­ers say.

Widen­ing the scope of prac­tice for people work­ing in the med­ic­al field, however, re­quires le­gis­la­tion. It would also take a cul­tur­al ree­valu­ation of what health care pro­fes­sion­als look like to the gen­er­al pub­lic. But white coat or not, the coun­try could use more of them in the com­ing years.


Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.