Outside Influences

Questionable Moves at USDA

Why does the department want to get two of its key agencies out of Washington?

Agriculture Secretary Sonny Perdue at a roundtable discussion at Landus Cooperative on Aug. 30 in Ames, Iowa
AP Photo/Charlie Neibergall
Sept. 4, 2018, 8 p.m.

When the House and Senate farm-bill conference committee meets Wednesday, there are some things they should discuss but probably won’t: the Trump administration’s decisions to place the Agriculture Department’s economic research functions directly under the secretary and to move most of the employees of the Economic Research Service and the National Institute for Food and Agriculture out of Washington.

Agriculture Secretary Sonny Perdue announced last month that he has placed the Office of the Chief Economist directly under him, and that he plans to “align” the Economic Research Service with the chief economist and to relocate most of the 600-plus employees of ERS and NIFA, which provides money to land-grant universities and other institutions for a wide range of agricultural research. He has already invited communities to tell the USDA by Sept. 14 why they should be the new home for the two divisions that have always been located in Washington.

Perdue’s argument is that he plans to move the agencies so that the researchers will be closer to the farmers and others who benefit from their work. He also said it has become harder to recruit employees from the land-grant universities that graduate most agricultural specialists, because the cost of living in the Washington area is so high.

National organizations and leaders who have a stake in the USDA’s leadership have denounced the plans.

The first and most outspoken opponent is Sonny Ramaswamy, who was director of NIFA for six years until May when his term was up.

On his Facebook page, Ramaswamy wrote, “Is this dumb and shortsighted or what? The National Institute of Food and Agriculture, which supports the most successful and envied research and extension enterprise in the world, is being proposed to be basically broken up.”

In an interview, Ramaswamy said, “I believe the justification to move NIFA fails on all three reasons cited: staff recruitment and retention; bringing NIFA closer to stakeholders; and cost savings.”

Ramaswamy said he had no trouble recruiting staff, but that the Trump administration often declined to let him replace key researchers.

Margaret Zeigler, executive director of the Global Harvest Initiative, a coalition of some of the biggest agribusiness companies, said the administration should keep ERS and NIFA in the Washington area because researchers are attracted to “considerable data resources and a range of related government institutions such as the National Science Foundation, the USDA Agricultural Research Service, the USDA Food and Nutrition Service, and other branches of USDA,” which will remain in Washington. Keeping ERS and NIFA in the Washington area “can harness the research synergies of all these institutions, reducing overlap and eliminating gaps in the important sector of food and agriculture research,” Zeigler said.

The Association of Public and Land-grant Universities said that NIFA, “the premier agricultural science entity in the world,” shouldn’t be moved out of the nation’s capital without further consideration.

If NIFA is located in a city where there is a “spectacular” land-grant university and NIFA makes grants to that university, then the other institutions are going to say, “What am I? Chopped liver?" Ramaswamy said.

University officials already come to Washington to visit various federal agencies, and requiring them to go to another city would add to their costs, he said.

Susan Offutt, a former ERS administrator, wrote in The Hill that placing ERS under a chief economist working for the secretary “jeopardizes the independence, credibility, and objectivity” of the agency. Moving it makes no sense, she added, "because ERS “is not a ‘farmer-facing’ agency, but rather supports congressional and administration policy officials as well as the program agencies of USDA that deliver key farm, environmental, and food services.”

The plan has led to wild speculation about the Trump administration’s real motives. One is that it would benefit a member of Congress. North Dakota Republican Rep. Kevin Cramer, who is trying to unseat Sen. Heidi Heitkamp, a Democrat, has already proposed that Fargo, North Dakota, home of North Dakota State University, would be a fine home for ERS and NIFA.

But the plan could also be more insidious. Perdue has said that the USDA will pay relocation costs for employees, but so many economists and researchers won’t want to make the move that it looks like a purge of progressive researchers. Perdue already demoted Mary Bohman, the ERS administrator, to associate administrator of the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service and appointed a man as acting ERS administrator. Could it be that the Trump administration wants to hire a new generation of white, male, heterosexual land-grant university graduates who are more likely to be interested in genetic modification, for example, than in climate change, obesity, or other topics of emerging interest?

Farm-bill conferees could put a provision in the conference report to forbid politicizing the economics function at the USDA and moving its renowned research functions. They should consider it.

What We're Following See More »
SCOTUS Limits State and Local Governments' Ability to Levy Fines
1 hours ago

"The U.S. Supreme Court curbed the power of cities and states to levy fines and seize property, siding with a man trying to keep his Land Rover after he pleaded guilty to selling drugs. The unanimous ruling marks the first time the court has said that states and cities are bound by the Constitution’s ban on excessive fines, part of the Eighth Amendment."

Putin Threatens Arms Race
2 hours ago

"Moscow will match any U.S. move to deploy new nuclear missiles closer to Russia by stationing its own missiles closer to the United States or by deploying faster missiles or both, President Vladimir Putin said on Wednesday. Putin said Russia was not seeking confrontation and would not take the first step to deploy missiles in response to Washington’s decision this month to quit a landmark Cold War-era arms control treaty."

MAY 26-28
Trump to Visit Japan
2 hours ago
Trump Signs Border Deal
4 days ago

"President Trump signed a sweeping spending bill Friday afternoon, averting another partial government shutdown. The action came after Trump had declared a national emergency in a move designed to circumvent Congress and build additional barriers at the southern border, where he said the United States faces 'an invasion of our country.'"

Trump Declares National Emergency
5 days ago

"President Donald Trump on Friday declared a state of emergency on the southern border and immediately direct $8 billion to construct or repair as many as 234 miles of a border barrier. The move — which is sure to invite vigorous legal challenges from activists and government officials — comes after Trump failed to get the $5.7 billion he was seeking from lawmakers. Instead, Trump agreed to sign a deal that included just $1.375 for border security."


Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.