Obama’s New and Improved Health Care Pledge

Version 2.0 of “If you like what you have” is far more accurate.

US President Barack Obama speaks about the healthcare reform laws, known as Obamacare, at an Organizing for Action event in Washington, DC, November 4, 2013.  
National Journal
Sam Baker
Nov. 5, 2013, 7:39 a.m.

Pres­id­ent Obama’s new ex­plan­a­tion for can­celed in­sur­ance plans isn’t as catchy as his old “If you like what you have, you can keep it” line — but it’s a lot more ac­cur­ate.

Ad­dress­ing sup­port­ers Monday night, Obama ad­ded in the nu­ance that was miss­ing from his fa­mil­i­ar, un­qual­i­fied pledge that people could keep their in­sur­ance plans.

“Now, if you have or had one of these plans be­fore the Af­ford­able Care Act came in­to law and you really like that plan, what we said was you could keep it if it hasn’t changed since the law was passed,” Obama said at an Or­gan­iz­ing for Ac­tion event.

That’s not, in fact, what he’s been say­ing over the years. If it was, the cur­rent blowup over can­cel­la­tion no­tices wouldn’t be as big a deal. Obama’s new line is a pretty ac­cur­ate de­scrip­tion of what’s go­ing on.

Obama ac­know­ledged Monday night that the law in­ten­ded to move people in­to more com­pre­hens­ive policies than they likely had pre-re­form.

“if we had al­lowed these old plans to be down­graded or sold to new en­rollees once the law had already passed, then we would have broken an even more im­port­ant prom­ise — mak­ing sure that Amer­ic­ans gain ac­cess to health care that doesn’t leave them one ill­ness away from fin­an­cial ru­in,” he said.

What’s really hap­pen­ing to health-care plans has got­ten lost in the back-and-forth over Obama’s “if you like what you have” prom­ise — a pledge that pretty clearly un­der­stated the scope of changes the Af­ford­able Care Act makes.

Re­pub­lic­ans are im­ply­ing that huge num­bers of people will lose their plans and that all of them will be forced to pay more for a new policy through Obama­care. Demo­crats, mean­while, say the plans be­ing can­celed now are lousy and that no one would ac­tu­ally like their can­celed policy if they truly un­der­stood it.

There’s some truth in both claims.

The Af­ford­able Care Act im­poses new reg­u­la­tions on in­sur­ance plans sold through the in­di­vidu­al mar­ket (people who buy in­sur­ance on their own, rather than get­ting it through an em­ploy­er). Plans that were already in ex­ist­ence when the law passed on March 23, 2010 were “grand­fathered,” mean­ing they didn’t have to com­ply with cer­tain re­quire­ments.

This is why Demo­crats ar­gue that con­sumers whose plans are be­ing can­celed will get an “up­grade” by pur­chas­ing a new plan.

Grand­fathered plans, for ex­ample, don’t have to cov­er people with preex­ist­ing con­di­tions — one of the most pop­u­lar ele­ments of Obama­care. They also don’t have to cov­er pre­vent­ive care without char­ging a co-pay, as non-grand­fathered plans do. And they can still im­pose an­nu­al caps on the be­ne­fits they’ll pay out. Those caps are il­leg­al for all non-grand­fathered plans.

Grand­fathered plans also don’t have to cov­er the 10 cat­egor­ies of “es­sen­tial health be­ne­fits” that new policies must in­clude. The ad­min­is­tra­tion left it up to the states to fill in spe­cif­ic re­quire­ments, but broadly, “es­sen­tial” be­ne­fits in­clude pre­scrip­tion drugs, emer­gency-room care, re­hab­il­it­a­tion, and ma­ter­nity care.

Grand­fath­er­ing was seen as a way to pre­serve Obama’s pledge. But to keep the plan you had in 2010, it has to be truly the same. HHS set tight re­stric­tions on the changes plans could make without los­ing their “grand­fathered” status. Those plans were leg­ally al­lowed to con­tin­ue, but it didn’t make fin­an­cial sense for in­sur­ance com­pan­ies to keep of­fer­ing them.

HHS pre­dicted in 2010 that as many as two-thirds of ex­ist­ing in­di­vidu­al policies would not be grand­fathered. Once they lost that status, in­surers could either ad­just those policies to meet the health care law’s re­quire­ments, or can­cel their ex­ist­ing plans and cre­ate new ones that com­plied with the law.

Be­cause most in­di­vidu­al policies only last for one year in the first place, most car­ri­ers chose to can­cel those policies rather than change them. And that’s why so many con­sumers have got­ten can­cel­la­tion no­tices.

Some of them — es­pe­cially young, healthy pa­tients — will have to pay more for a new policy.

Oth­ers, in­clud­ing people with ex­pens­ive preex­ist­ing con­di­tions, might get a bet­ter deal through the law’s ex­changes, once those mar­ket­places be­come fully ac­cess­ible. Plans there must cov­er es­sen­tial be­ne­fits, and low-in­come con­sumers will get tax sub­sidies to help cov­er their premi­ums.

“We should en­cour­age any Amer­ic­an who gets one of these let­ters to shop around in the new mar­ket­place,” Obama said. “Now, I re­cog­nize that while the web­site isn’t work­ing as fast as it needs to, that makes it tough­er, and that makes it scar­i­er for folks.”

{{ BIZOBJ (video: 4545) }}

What We're Following See More »
How Much Did the IRS Overpay in Earned Income Tax Credit Benefits?
1 hours ago

An estimated $15.6 billion, "according to a Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration report."

McAuliffe Under Investigation for Fundraising
2 hours ago

Virginia Gov. Terry McAuliffe (D) “is the subject of an ongoing investigation by the FBI and … the Justice Department” for potentially improper contributions to his 2013 campaign, including while he was a Clinton Global Initiative board member. ... Among the McAuliffe donations that drew the interest of the investigators was $120,000 from” former Chinese legislator Wang Wenliang. “U.S. election law prohibits foreign nationals from donating to … elections. … But Wang holds U.S. permanent resident status.”

Trump Takes Aim at Bill Clinton
2 hours ago

"Donald Trump is reviving some of the ugliest political chapters of the 1990s with escalating personal attacks on Bill Clinton's character, part of a concerted effort to smother Hillary Clinton 's campaign message with the weight of decades of controversy. Trump's latest shot came Monday when he released an incendiary Instagram video that includes the voices of two women who accused the former president of sexual assault, underscoring the presumptive Republican nominee's willingness to go far beyond political norms in his critique of his likely Democratic rival. ...In one recent interview, Trump said another topic of potential concern is the suicide of former White House aide Vincent Foster, which remains the focus of intense and far-fetched conspiracy theories on the Internet."

Head of Security for TSA Has Been Reassigned
2 hours ago

"The head of security for the Transportation Security Administration, Kelly Hoggan, has been removed from his position after a hearing about the agency's management, the House Oversight Committee says." Deputy assistant administrator Darby LaJoye will take over for Hoggan on a temporary basis.

Transportation Sec. Names Special Adviser for Metro System
4 hours ago

"Transportation Secretary Anthony Foxx has appointed a veteran legal insider with strong personal ties to the Obama administration to serve as his special adviser focused exclusively on fixing the Washington region’s troubled Metro system. Kathryn Thomson, who was expected to leave her job as the Department of Transportation’s top lawyer, instead will stay on as Foxx’s special adviser on Metro oversight." She'll start this week.