Top Court Hears Case of Jilted Wife Charged Under Chemical-Arms Law

Global Security Newswire Staff
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Global Security Newswire Staff
Nov. 5, 2013, 11:02 a.m.

The U.S. Su­preme Court on Tues­day ap­peared sym­path­et­ic to a mi­cro­bi­o­lo­gist’s ar­gu­ment that she was un­fairly pro­sec­uted un­der a fed­er­al law that im­ple­ments the Chem­ic­al Weapons Con­ven­tion after she tried to pois­on a ro­mantic rival, ac­cord­ing to re­ports.

The na­tion’s top justices weighed the ap­peal of 42-year old Car­ol Ann Bond, who in 2008 pled guilty to try­ing to pois­on her hus­band’s preg­nant lov­er, Myrlina Haynes, with a chem­ic­al com­pound. Bond was charged in fed­er­al court with vi­ol­at­ing the 1998 Chem­ic­al Weapons Con­ven­tion Im­ple­ment­a­tion Act, the law the im­ple­men­ted the 1997 Chem­ic­al Weapons Con­ven­tion in the United States. She was sen­tenced to six years in pris­on and fought that con­vic­tion, ar­guing fed­er­al pro­sec­utors in­fringed upon state au­thor­ity by fil­ing charges against her un­der a law cre­ated to de­ter the use of chem­ic­al weapons by rogue na­tions and ter­ror­ists.

Most of the justices ap­peared “down­right angry” with the fed­er­al gov­ern­ment’s use of an in­ter­na­tion­al treaty to pro­sec­ute a wo­man in a do­mest­ic spat, USA Today re­por­ted. They ques­tioned if the Chem­ic­al Weapons Con­ven­tion and the law Con­gress passed im­ple­ment­ing it were in­ten­ded to reach to such do­mest­ic crimes or re­main only ap­plic­able to war­time mat­ters. At its core, the case is about wheth­er Con­gress can use its power to im­ple­ment treat­ies on loc­al mat­ters not nor­mally ap­plic­able to fed­er­al law, ac­cord­ing to Bloomberg.

It “seems un­ima­gin­able that you would bring this pro­sec­u­tion,” Justice An­thony Kennedy re­portedly told U.S. So­li­cit­or Gen­er­al Don­ald Ver­rilli, ac­cord­ing to the As­so­ci­ated Press.

Bond’s at­tor­ney, former U.S. so­li­cit­or gen­er­al Paul Clem­ent, re­ferred to his cli­ent’s crime con­sisted of “garden-vari­ety as­saults with chem­ic­als.”

Ver­rilli, though, ar­gued on be­half of Pres­id­ent Obama’s ad­min­is­tra­tion that if its treaty power were altered, U.S. ini­ti­at­ives re­lated to chem­ic­al weapons and nuc­le­ar non­pro­lif­er­a­tion could be hampered.

“There needs to be a com­pre­hens­ive ban,” Ver­rilli re­portedly ar­gued be­fore the high court. “You can’t be draw­ing these types of lines.”

Justice Elena Kagan, mean­while, main­tained that the Chem­ic­al Weapons Con­ven­tion and con­gres­sion­al im­ple­ment­a­tion of the treaty were sound and there­fore para­mount, USA Today re­por­ted. If they were not, judges would “take the place of treaty-makers,” she re­portedly said.

What We're Following See More »
TWO MONTHS AFTER REFUSING AT CONVENTION
Cruz to Back Trump
1 days ago
THE LATEST
WHO TO BELIEVE?
Two Polls for Clinton, One for Trump
1 days ago
THE LATEST

With three days until the first debate, the polls are coming fast and furious. The latest round:

  • An Associated Press/Gfk poll of registered voters found very few voters committed, with Clin­ton lead­ing Trump, 37% to 29%, and Gary John­son at 7%.
  • A Mc­Clatchy-Mar­ist poll gave Clin­ton a six-point edge, 45% to 39%, in a four-way bal­lot test. Johnson pulls 10% support, with Jill Stein at 4%.
  • Rasmussen, which has drawn criticism for continually showing Donald Trump doing much better than he does in other polls, is at it again. A new survey gives Trump a five-point lead, 44%-39%.
NO SURPRISE
Trump Eschewing Briefing Materials in Debate Prep
1 days ago
THE DETAILS

In contrast to Hillary Clinton's meticulous debate practice sessions, Donald Trump "is largely shun­ning tra­di­tion­al de­bate pre­par­a­tions, but has been watch­ing video of…Clin­ton’s best and worst de­bate mo­ments, look­ing for her vul­ner­ab­il­it­ies.” Trump “has paid only curs­ory at­ten­tion to brief­ing ma­ter­i­als. He has re­fused to use lecterns in mock de­bate ses­sions des­pite the ur­ging of his ad­visers. He prefers spit­balling ideas with his team rather than hon­ing them in­to crisp, two-minute an­swers.”

Source:
TRUMP NO HABLA ESPANOL
Trump Makes No Outreach to Spanish Speakers
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Donald Trump "is on the precipice of becoming the only major-party presidential candidate this century not to reach out to millions of American voters whose dominant, first or just preferred language is Spanish. Trump has not only failed to buy any Spanish-language television or radio ads, he so far has avoided even offering a translation of his website into Spanish, breaking with two decades of bipartisan tradition."

Source:
$1.16 MILLION
Clintons Buy the House Next Door in Chappaqua
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Bill and Hillary Clinton have purchased the home next door to their primary residence in tony Chappaqua, New York, for $1.16 million. "By purchasing the new home, the Clinton's now own the entire cul-de-sac at the end of the road in the leafy New York suburb. The purchase makes it easier for the United States Secret Service to protect the former president and possible future commander in chief."

Source:
×