Colorado’s Elections Were Fracked

The results of several anti-fracking measures that went before voters Tuesday were mixed.

<p>Voters in four Colorado towns went to the polls Tuesday to decide on anti-fracking measures, which could influence the conversation nationwide.</p>
National Journal
Amy Harder
Nov. 6, 2013, 3:09 a.m.

FORT COLLINS, Colo. — For­get weed and se­ces­sion, Col­or­ado’s elec­tions were fracked.

On Tues­day, voters in three Col­or­ado cit­ies, in­clud­ing this col­lege town about an hour north of Den­ver and nearby La­fay­ette and Boulder, passed ini­ti­at­ives against frack­ing, a drilling tech­nique key to ex­tract­ing oil and nat­ur­al gas around the coun­try but con­tro­ver­sial for its en­vir­on­ment­al risks. A sim­il­ar meas­ure in the town of Broom­field failed by an ex­tremely nar­row mar­gin, and two cit­ies in Ohio, Bowl­ing Green and Young­stown, also de­feated anti-frack­ing ini­ti­at­ives.

The ef­forts were among sev­er­al high-pro­file ini­ti­at­ives on the bal­lot in Col­or­ado, in­clud­ing one in which 11 north­ern counties sought to se­cede from the state (five voted to sup­port the meas­ure) and an­oth­er that ap­proved a new tax on marijuana, which was leg­al­ized last year. All were over­shad­owed by high-pro­file gubernat­ori­al races in New Jer­sey and Vir­gin­ia, but the frack­ing votes could in­flu­ence the con­ver­sa­tion tak­ing place na­tion­wide over the con­tro­ver­sial drilling tech­nique.

Back­ers of the anti-frack­ing bal­lot ini­ti­at­ives in Col­or­ado, which to vary­ing de­grees sought to ban or tem­por­ar­ily delay frack­ing, de­clared vic­tory Tues­day night and said it por­tends well for oth­er anti-frack­ing ef­forts around the coun­try. Though, thanks to Broom­field, they could not de­clare a sweep.

“I think this will raise aware­ness,” said Demo­crat­ic state Rep. Joann Gin­al, who rep­res­ents Fort Collins, at a vic­tory party for the anti-frack­ing cam­paign Tues­day night. “I know that New York and Pennsylvania and Ohio and many oth­er states have been try­ing to raise aware­ness. I think this will res­ult in more aware­ness.”

Col­or­ado has al­ways been a large oil and gas pro­du­cer, and thanks to frack­ing and ho­ri­zont­al drilling, com­pan­ies here are ramp­ing up oil pro­duc­tion, es­pe­cially in this area on the Front Range, just east of the Rocky Moun­tains and north of Den­ver. This has promp­ted a po­lar­iz­ing de­bate over wheth­er and how much to al­low frack­ing, which has pit­ted Den­ver’s north­ern sub­urb­an voters against the state’s Demo­crat­ic gov­ernor, John Hick­en­loop­er, who has fully sup­por­ted ro­bust oil and gas de­vel­op­ment and main­tained frack­ing can be done safely.

He is not the only one who thinks so.

“There’s noth­ing in­her­ently dan­ger­ous in frack­ing that sound en­gin­eer­ing prac­tices can’t ac­com­plish,” En­vir­on­ment­al Pro­tec­tion Agency Ad­min­is­trat­or Gina Mc­Carthy said this week in an in­ter­view with the Bo­ston Globe. In­deed, Pres­id­ent Obama and his ad­min­is­tra­tion have been con­sist­ently bullish on nat­ur­al gas — and spe­cific­ally frack­ing — which ex­tracts both oil and gas.

Non­ethe­less, the res­id­ents of Fort Collins and its neigh­bors main­tain they don’t want frack­ing un­til they can en­sure it is be­ing done safely. Com­pan­ies have been frack­ing for dec­ades, but not so much in urb­an areas. That has changed in the past few years, as ho­ri­zont­al drilling has en­abled com­pan­ies to reach new form­a­tions miles un­der­ground.

Kelly Gid­dens, who dir­ects the Cit­izens for a Healthy Fort Collins cam­paign that backed the five-year morator­i­um on frack­ing, said the city should wait un­til a state health-agency study is com­plete in mid-2016 be­fore de­cid­ing.

“Our fo­cus has been on how can they solve prob­lems if they don’t know what they are?” Gid­dens said Tues­day night as the res­ults were com­ing in. “We’re not look­ing at real data and the real health ef­fects they could be caus­ing.”

What hap­pens now is un­clear. An­oth­er nearby Col­or­ado city, Long­mont, already im­posed a frack­ing ban and is now fa­cing law­suits by Hick­en­loop­er and the Col­or­ado Oil and Gas As­so­ci­ation. The reas­ons for each suit are dif­fer­ent (Hick­en­loop­er’s ad­min­is­tra­tion is wor­ried about the bal­ance between state and loc­al rights), but the res­ult for Long­mont is the same: a pro­trac­ted leg­al mess.

“It’s not that I don’t be­lieve in frack­ing, but we’re just go­ing to get sued by the state,” said Luke Cal­len, a mu­si­cian and bar-go­er who happened to be at the Gid­dens’s vic­tory party Tues­day night in Fort Collins. He said the vote will amount to ba­sic­ally “a ges­ture: ‘Here’s what we all feel.’ “

Gid­dens is well aware of Long­mont’s pre­dic­a­ment, but she points out that Long­mont im­posed a per­man­ent ban, where­as Fort Collins’ is a tem­por­ary morator­i­um.

“We feel this is something that’s leg­ally de­fens­ible,” Gid­dens said. “It’s about pro­tect­ing the health and rights of our com­munity, so it’s something that should stand up in court.”

Gid­dens and every­one else liv­ing on the Front Range will likely get the chance to find out. Col­or­ado’s frack­ing fight really has just be­gun.

{{ BIZOBJ (video: 4389) }}

What We're Following See More »
What the Current Crop of Candidates Could Learn from JFK
1 days ago

Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”

Maher Weighs in on Bernie, Trump and Palin
1 days ago

“We haven’t seen a true leftist since FDR, so many millions are coming out of the woodwork to vote for Bernie Sanders; he is the Occupy movement now come to life in the political arena.” So says Bill Maher in his Hollywood Reporter cover story (more a stream-of-consciousness riff than an essay, actually). Conservative states may never vote for a socialist in the general election, but “this stuff has never been on the table, and these voters have never been activated.” Maher saves most of his bile for Donald Trump and Sarah Palin, writing that by nominating Palin as vice president “John McCain is the one who opened the Book of the Dead and let the monsters out.” And Trump is picking up where Palin left off.