7 Ways Clinton and Christie Could Bungle 2016

She’s the status quo, he’s a bully, and a dark horse could emerge like Obama did for 2008.

National Journal
Ron Fournier
Nov. 6, 2013, 4:20 a.m.

It’s easy to spin a post­mortem ana­lys­is of Tues­day’s elec­tions as a pre­curs­or to a 2016 pres­id­en­tial cam­paign pit­ting Re­pub­lic­an Chris Christie against Demo­crat Hil­lary Rod­ham Clin­ton. Christie won reelec­tion as gov­ernor of New Jer­sey in a land­slide, at­tract­ing minor­ity and wo­men voters in num­bers un­reach­able for most Re­pub­lic­ans. Clin­ton ally Terry McAul­iffe won the Vir­gin­ia gubernat­ori­al elec­tion with a staff stocked from her or­bit.

There is even data: Exit polls show Clin­ton nar­rowly beat­ing Christie in New Jer­sey

It’s hard to res­ist the ap­peal of con­ven­tion­al wis­dom — but in this case (ac­tu­ally, in most cases) you should. Here are sev­en reas­ons to re­main open to any­thing oth­er than a Clin­ton-Christie con­test.

Clin­ton is the status quo. Yes, she would be the first fe­male pres­id­ent. And, since her days in Arkan­sas, the former first lady and sec­ret­ary of State has been a for­ward-thinker on is­sues that mat­ter to people buf­feted by the cur­rents of so­cial and eco­nom­ic change. But the Clin­ton fam­ily is a polit­ic­al in­sti­tu­tion at a time when voters are look­ing to dis­rupt and re­build in­sti­tu­tions. A gen­er­a­tion after she helped her hus­band win the pres­id­ency as an “agent of change,” re­claim­ing that mantle will be tricky.

Christie is a Re­pub­lic­an. That means he can’t be pres­id­ent without win­ning the GOP nom­in­a­tion, which re­quires fealty to a no-com­prom­ise brand of con­ser­vat­ism that mod­er­ate voters ab­hor. As Jonath­an Chait wrote, Christie sup­ports gun con­trol and im­mig­ra­tion re­form, and agrees with the over­whelm­ing weight of sci­entif­ic evid­ence on cli­mate change. The tea party won’t like him. If he pulls a John Mc­Cain and lurches right for the nom­in­a­tion (as the Ari­zona sen­at­or did in 2008), Christie likely would suf­fer a sim­il­ar fate.

Clin­ton is un­tested. It seems odd to write those words about a wo­man I watched over­come sex­ism and skep­ti­cism in Arkan­sas and scan­dal in Wash­ing­ton to be­come a U.S. sen­at­or and sec­ret­ary of State. But it’s a fact that Clin­ton has run just one ser­i­ously con­tested cam­paign, the 2008 Demo­crat­ic nom­in­a­tion fight against Barack Obama. It was hers to lose, and she lost it. (She won her Sen­ate seat in a Demo­crat­ic state, New York, and against a weak GOP foe, Rick Lazio.)

Christie has skel­et­ons in his closet. Mark Halper­in and John Heile­mann re­port in their book Double Down that Mitt Rom­ney passed over Christie for the 2012 vice pres­id­en­tial nom­in­a­tion after a back­ground check raised red flags. Among them: a 2010 Justice De­part­ment in­spect­or gen­er­al’s in­vest­ig­a­tion of Christie’s spend­ing prac­tices in his job be­fore he was gov­ernor, his ac­tions as a lob­by­ist, and his de­cisions to steer gov­ern­ment con­tract­ors to polit­ic­al al­lies.

Clin­ton is out of prac­tice.  Her last polit­ic­al cam­paign was five years ago. Her last vic­tory was sev­en years ago. The ques­tion is wheth­er Clin­ton’s re­tail cam­paign skills have im­proved or de­clined with time. For 25 years now, I have marveled at the dis­tance between her pub­lic ca­ri­ca­ture (cold, angry, and ma­nip­u­lat­ive) and her private per­sona (warm, funny, and en­ga­ging — more so even than her fam­ously charm­ing hus­band). It’s pos­sible that the 2008 de­feat as well as her time out of the arena taught Clin­ton to break out of her hard shell.

Christie is a bully. In an era of de­cep­tion, Christie’s blunt style is an enorm­ous as­set. But it could also be a li­ab­il­ity if voters start in­ter­pret­ing his pas­sion as lack of tol­er­ance, dis­cip­line, and sta­bil­ity. How well will he wear on voters?

Re­mem­ber 2005. The elec­tion is three years away. It might as well be three dec­ades away giv­en the speed of mod­ern cul­ture. In 2005, three years be­fore the Obama-Mc­Cain gen­er­al elec­tion, USA Today pub­lished the res­ult of a poll show­ing New York May­or Rudy Gi­uliani as the front-run­ner for the 2008 GOP nom­in­a­tion.

Among Demo­crats, Clin­ton lapped the pack with 40 per­cent sup­port. She led both Sens. John Kerry and John Ed­wards, the 2004 tick­et. Obama was not even men­tioned. That raises the ques­tion: Who is the 2016 dark horse?

COR­REC­TION: The ori­gin­al story in­cor­rectly stated how long it had been since Clin­ton’s last elec­tion vic­tory. The year was 2006.

MOST READ
What We're Following See More »
1.5 MILLION MORE TUNED IN FOR TRUMP
More People Watched Trump’s Acceptance Speech
1 days ago
THE DETAILS

Hillary Clinton hopes that television ratings for the candidates' acceptance speeches at their respective conventions aren't foreshadowing of similar results at the polls in November. Preliminary results from the networks and cable channels show that 34.9 million people tuned in for Donald Trump's acceptance speech while 33.3 million watched Clinton accept the Democratic nomination. However, it is still possible that the numbers are closer than these ratings suggest: the numbers don't include ratings from PBS or CSPAN, which tend to attract more Democratic viewers.

Source:
×