7 Ways Clinton and Christie Could Bungle 2016

She’s the status quo, he’s a bully, and a dark horse could emerge like Obama did for 2008.

National Journal
Ron Fournier
Add to Briefcase
Ron Fournier
Nov. 6, 2013, 4:20 a.m.

It’s easy to spin a post­mortem ana­lys­is of Tues­day’s elec­tions as a pre­curs­or to a 2016 pres­id­en­tial cam­paign pit­ting Re­pub­lic­an Chris Christie against Demo­crat Hil­lary Rod­ham Clin­ton. Christie won reelec­tion as gov­ernor of New Jer­sey in a land­slide, at­tract­ing minor­ity and wo­men voters in num­bers un­reach­able for most Re­pub­lic­ans. Clin­ton ally Terry McAul­iffe won the Vir­gin­ia gubernat­ori­al elec­tion with a staff stocked from her or­bit.

There is even data: Exit polls show Clin­ton nar­rowly beat­ing Christie in New Jer­sey

It’s hard to res­ist the ap­peal of con­ven­tion­al wis­dom — but in this case (ac­tu­ally, in most cases) you should. Here are sev­en reas­ons to re­main open to any­thing oth­er than a Clin­ton-Christie con­test.

Clin­ton is the status quo. Yes, she would be the first fe­male pres­id­ent. And, since her days in Arkan­sas, the former first lady and sec­ret­ary of State has been a for­ward-thinker on is­sues that mat­ter to people buf­feted by the cur­rents of so­cial and eco­nom­ic change. But the Clin­ton fam­ily is a polit­ic­al in­sti­tu­tion at a time when voters are look­ing to dis­rupt and re­build in­sti­tu­tions. A gen­er­a­tion after she helped her hus­band win the pres­id­ency as an “agent of change,” re­claim­ing that mantle will be tricky.

Christie is a Re­pub­lic­an. That means he can’t be pres­id­ent without win­ning the GOP nom­in­a­tion, which re­quires fealty to a no-com­prom­ise brand of con­ser­vat­ism that mod­er­ate voters ab­hor. As Jonath­an Chait wrote, Christie sup­ports gun con­trol and im­mig­ra­tion re­form, and agrees with the over­whelm­ing weight of sci­entif­ic evid­ence on cli­mate change. The tea party won’t like him. If he pulls a John Mc­Cain and lurches right for the nom­in­a­tion (as the Ari­zona sen­at­or did in 2008), Christie likely would suf­fer a sim­il­ar fate.

Clin­ton is un­tested. It seems odd to write those words about a wo­man I watched over­come sex­ism and skep­ti­cism in Arkan­sas and scan­dal in Wash­ing­ton to be­come a U.S. sen­at­or and sec­ret­ary of State. But it’s a fact that Clin­ton has run just one ser­i­ously con­tested cam­paign, the 2008 Demo­crat­ic nom­in­a­tion fight against Barack Obama. It was hers to lose, and she lost it. (She won her Sen­ate seat in a Demo­crat­ic state, New York, and against a weak GOP foe, Rick Lazio.)

Christie has skel­et­ons in his closet. Mark Halper­in and John Heile­mann re­port in their book Double Down that Mitt Rom­ney passed over Christie for the 2012 vice pres­id­en­tial nom­in­a­tion after a back­ground check raised red flags. Among them: a 2010 Justice De­part­ment in­spect­or gen­er­al’s in­vest­ig­a­tion of Christie’s spend­ing prac­tices in his job be­fore he was gov­ernor, his ac­tions as a lob­by­ist, and his de­cisions to steer gov­ern­ment con­tract­ors to polit­ic­al al­lies.

Clin­ton is out of prac­tice.  Her last polit­ic­al cam­paign was five years ago. Her last vic­tory was sev­en years ago. The ques­tion is wheth­er Clin­ton’s re­tail cam­paign skills have im­proved or de­clined with time. For 25 years now, I have marveled at the dis­tance between her pub­lic ca­ri­ca­ture (cold, angry, and ma­nip­u­lat­ive) and her private per­sona (warm, funny, and en­ga­ging — more so even than her fam­ously charm­ing hus­band). It’s pos­sible that the 2008 de­feat as well as her time out of the arena taught Clin­ton to break out of her hard shell.

Christie is a bully. In an era of de­cep­tion, Christie’s blunt style is an enorm­ous as­set. But it could also be a li­ab­il­ity if voters start in­ter­pret­ing his pas­sion as lack of tol­er­ance, dis­cip­line, and sta­bil­ity. How well will he wear on voters?

Re­mem­ber 2005. The elec­tion is three years away. It might as well be three dec­ades away giv­en the speed of mod­ern cul­ture. In 2005, three years be­fore the Obama-Mc­Cain gen­er­al elec­tion, USA Today pub­lished the res­ult of a poll show­ing New York May­or Rudy Gi­uliani as the front-run­ner for the 2008 GOP nom­in­a­tion.

Among Demo­crats, Clin­ton lapped the pack with 40 per­cent sup­port. She led both Sens. John Kerry and John Ed­wards, the 2004 tick­et. Obama was not even men­tioned. That raises the ques­tion: Who is the 2016 dark horse?

COR­REC­TION: The ori­gin­al story in­cor­rectly stated how long it had been since Clin­ton’s last elec­tion vic­tory. The year was 2006.

What We're Following See More »
A CANDIDATE TO BE ‘PROUD’ OF
Chicago Tribune Endorses Gary Johnson
22 minutes ago
THE LATEST

No matter that his recall of foreign leaders leaves something to be desired, Gary Johnson is the choice of the Chicago Tribune's editorial board. The editors argue that Donald Trump couldn't do the job of president, while hitting Hillary Clinton for "her intent to greatly increase federal spending and taxation, and serious questions about honesty and trust." Which leaves them with Johnson. "Every American who casts a vote for him is standing for principles," they write, "and can be proud of that vote. Yes, proud of a candidate in 2016."

FUNERAL FOR ISRAELI LEADER
Obama Compares Peres to ‘Giants of the 20th Century’
40 minutes ago
THE DETAILS

Speaking at the funeral of former Israeli Prime Minister Shimon Peres, President Obama "compared Peres to 'other giants of the 20th century' such as Nelson Mandela and Queen Elizabeth who 'find no need to posture or traffic in what's popular in the moment.'" Among the 6,000 mourners at the service was Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas. Obama called Abbas's presence a sign of the "unfinished business of peace" in the region.

Source:
THE QUESTION
How Many New Voters Does the Clinton Campaign Aim to Register?
48 minutes ago
THE ANSWER

Three million—a number that lays "bare the significant gap between Donald Trump’s bare-bones operation and the field program that Clinton and her hundreds of aides have been building for some 17 months."

Source:
“STANDING FOR PRINCIPLES”
Chicago Tribune Endorses Johnson
1 hours ago
THE LATEST

In a somewhat shocking move, the Chicago Tribune has endorsed Libertarian candidate Gary Johnson for president, saying a vote for him is one that voters "can be proud of." The editorial barely touches on Donald Trump, who the paper has time and again called "unfit to be president," before offering a variety of reasons for why it can't endorse Hillary Clinton. Johnson has been in the news this week for being unable to name a single world leader who he admires, after earlier this month being unable to identify "Aleppo," a major Syrian city in the middle of the country's ongoing war.

Source:
NEVER TRUMP
USA Today Weighs in on Presidential Race for First Time Ever
14 hours ago
THE DETAILS

"By all means vote, just not for Donald Trump." That's the message from USA Today editors, who are making the first recommendation on a presidential race in the paper's 34-year history. It's not exactly an endorsement; they make clear that the editorial board "does not have a consensus for a Clinton endorsement." But they state flatly that Donald Trump is, by "unanimous consensus of the editorial board, unfit for the presidency."

Source:
×